Re: dbus building pains

2006-07-24 Thread Don Scorgie
Hi, I managed to get jhbuild working (or at least managed to compile most of the modules) last night / today. I got around the problem described by (IIRC) rebuilding dbus (the original package) with --localstatedir=/var as a configure flag. This almost certainly breaks a lot of things and one

what happened to the build discussion?[was Re: dbus building pains]

2006-07-24 Thread Luis Villa
Tangential to this, there was an awesome BOF at GUADEC about continuous build integration, which hopefully would avoid problems like this. Has there been any news on that front that I missed? :) Thanks- Luis On 7/24/06, Jason D. Clinton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After bludgeoning jhbuild to get

Re: dbus building pains

2006-07-24 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 16:07 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote: The system bus (=0.90) needs to be running and accessible by the build. We need to remove this dependency in the future. The quick fix is to build outside of jhbuild and copy the dbus-bus-introspect.xml into the tools directory

Re: what happened to the build discussion?[was Re: dbus building pains]

2006-07-24 Thread Frederic Peters
Luis Villa wrote: Tangential to this, there was an awesome BOF at GUADEC about continuous build integration, which hopefully would avoid problems like this. Has there been any news on that front that I missed? :) Things I know: Thomas looked at issues with coverage support in GCC 4 and got it

Re: what happened to the build discussion?[was Re: dbus building pains]

2006-07-24 Thread Luis Villa
On 7/24/06, Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luis Villa wrote: Tangential to this, there was an awesome BOF at GUADEC about continuous build integration, which hopefully would avoid problems like this. Has there been any news on that front that I missed? :) Things I know: Thomas