Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

Is desktop-devel-list the wrong place to ask how to use the new categories in doap files? An explanation is needed in https://wiki.gnome.org/Git/FAQ#How_do_I_add_a_description_to_the_git_web_view.3F__What_is_this_.22blah.doap.22.3F. Den 2014-08-28 10:19, Kjell Ahlstedt skrev: When I tried to c

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

When I tried to change libxml++.doap, git refused to push the changes. remote: ERROR: libxml++.doap is not valid: remote:doap:category property should be one of: apps,core,core-apps,deprecated,infrastructure The category in libxml++.doap is still bindings. I don't understand which one of

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 12:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > So I decided to pretend to be an app, to get past the checker, but it > didn't work: I still get the same error no matter what I do. Am I > making > a mistake or is this a bug on your end? Here is my doap: Actually I'm sorry, it's my fa

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 01:33 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > 1. New categories: Core, Core Apps, Apps >Note: Not every module has been put into right category. If you > spot >errors, please let release-t...@gnome.org know. I'm planning to add >some cross checks in the release team scripts t

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

Michael Catanzaro wrote: ... > This is very much a work in progress, but here's a good proposal from > Allan: https://wiki.gnome.org/AllanDay/Modulesets Note that this page is a personal draft, and I'm waiting to hear back from the Release Team about it. Allan ___

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 21:53 +0200, scl wrote: > Hi, > > thank you for your answers. > I've removed now the M4 language item from the Babl > description and also removed the category. Now it > is filed under 'Not part of a suite'. From my recent > experiences I assumed we now have *only* the catego

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

Hi, thank you for your answers. I've removed now the M4 language item from the Babl description and also removed the category. Now it is filed under 'Not part of a suite'. From my recent experiences I assumed we now have *only* the categories Core, Core-Apps, Apps, Deprecated, Infrastructure, don

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 15:09 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > In jhbuild's moduleset definitions it's currently listed in: > https://git.gnome.org/browse/jhbuild/tree/modulesets/gnome-apps-3.14.modules > > andre The problem is that there are modules in gnome-apps, like babl, that are not apps, but ju

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 15:31 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > > Er, so what category does babl belong in? I'm pretty sure it's not > > core, but it's the only plausible choice here. > > I think if you don't mention any category it'll go to the "other" > category. OK, that seems best for babl. s

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 08:03 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 08:05 +0200, scl wrote: > > remote: ERROR: babl.doap is not valid: > > remote:doap:category property should be one of: > > apps,core,core-apps,deprecated,infrastructure > > Er, so what category does babl belon

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 08:03 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 08:05 +0200, scl wrote: > > remote: ERROR: babl.doap is not valid: > > remote:doap:category property should be one of: > > apps,core,core-apps,deprecated,infrastructure > > Er, so what category does babl belon

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 08:05 +0200, scl wrote: > remote: ERROR: babl.doap is not valid: > remote:doap:category property should be one of: > apps,core,core-apps,deprecated,infrastructure Er, so what category does babl belong in? I'm pretty sure it's not core, but it's the only plausible choice

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 11:14 +0200, scl wrote: > Indeed. > I wanted to be precise and listed 'Shell Command Language' and 'M4'. > Now that I see how the Owner row breaks the layout, I'm hesitating > whether we want to list them, because presumably every GNOME project > uses the Autotools which inclu

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

Hi, does anybody of the GNOME dev feel called upon my questions? How are contributors supposed to follow the new way if nobody of the devs bothers to even give an answer? :-/ Thank you in advance Sven ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On 3.8.2014 at 10:45 AM Carlos Soriano Sánchez wrote: Hi, Thanks a lot for this, now we can point newcommers to git.gnome.org to take a look on apps in some specific programming language. I spotted an error though, trying to order the column Owner breaks the style and it

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

Hi, Thanks a lot for this, now we can point newcommers to git.gnome.org to take a look on apps in some specific programming language. I spotted an error though, trying to order the column Owner breaks the style and it doesn't order, so we can see programs in the same programming language consecutiv

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On 3.8.2014 at 10:32 AM Olav Vitters wrote: On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 08:05:21AM +0200, scl wrote: What am I doing wrong? Needs the git hook to be fixed? Right, instead of testing that it gives an error, I should also have tested that it works as intended. I fixed about 3 bugs now, please try

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 08:05:21AM +0200, scl wrote: > What am I doing wrong? Needs the git hook to be fixed? Right, instead of testing that it gives an error, I should also have tested that it works as intended. I fixed about 3 bugs now, please try again. :-P -- Regards, Olav __

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

Hi Olav On 2014-08-03 01:33, Olav Vitters wrote: Aside from above I also slightly changed the wiki.gnome.org header (e.g. shows RecentChanges+Schedule again). The Schedule is IMO quite important. Excellent, I had been missing that since the redesign! (Of course, thanks for all the DOAP chang

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

On 3.8.2014 at 1:33 AM Olav Vitters wrote: 1. New categories: Core, Core Apps, Apps There is something wrong when pushing: When I have the line http://api.gnome.org/doap-extensions#core"; /> in my DOAP file and push, I get the error remote: ERROR: babl.doap is not valid: remote:doap:c

Re: git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

Hi, thank you for your efforts. I just tried to update some DOAP files (and thought it's a quick job), but came across some questions: On 3.8.2014 at 1:33 AM Olav Vitters wrote: [ Please reply to desktop-devel-list@gnome.org ] André Klapper suggested we should make more use of the doap file

git.gnome.org changes and new doap file requirements

[ Please reply to desktop-devel-list@gnome.org ] André Klapper suggested we should make more use of the doap files. As a result of that together with GUADEC, the following changes have been made on git.gnome.org: 1. New categories: Core, Core Apps, Apps Note: Not every module has been put int