On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
> I've pushed a new iso to fix this:
I tried the new image.
First issue is not totally resolved. I saw Pinyin, Bopomofo and
Chewing now. They are phone-based Chinese input methods. You should
also at least include three most popular stroke-based
Hey,
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> The live image is downloaded from:
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/misc/promo-usb/GNOME-3.6.0.iso
I've pushed a new iso to fix this:
> Firstly, according to "rpm -qa | grep ibus" and Input Sources tab,
>
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> The live image is downloaded from:
> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/misc/promo-usb/GNOME-3.6.0.iso
Hey, thanks for testing this, and providing feedback !
> Firstly, according to "rpm -qa | grep ibus" and Input Sources
The live image is downloaded from:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/misc/promo-usb/GNOME-3.6.0.iso
Firstly, according to "rpm -qa | grep ibus" and Input Sources tab,
there is no Chinese input sources but there is Japanese (ibus-anthy)
and Korean (ibus-hangul) input sources. Why is that?
On 06/22/2012 05:40 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
Hey, again,
I forgot to announce I put up one for 3.5.2:
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.2-LiveUSB.iso
First of all, this is great for QA of development versions. Already
filed a couple of bugs that I would have seen first after w
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hey, again,
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
> > I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here:
> >
> > http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso
>
Hey, again,
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
> I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here:
>
> http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso
I forgot to announce I put up one for 3.5.2:
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/test
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here:
>
> http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso
>
>
Woot! Well played sir, well played. Thank you for this gift. :)
Now
Hey Ray,
Ray Strode wrote:
...
> I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here:
>
> http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso
...
> It's a little hacked together, at the moment. I'd like to get the
> process I used more refined
Hey,
I put together a live image with a jhbuild built in it here:
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/gnome/misc/testing/GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso
You can write the image to a usb stick with this command:
sudo dd if=GNOME-3.5.1-LiveUSB.iso of=/dev/DRIVE bs=8M conv=fsync
(where DRIVE is a usb stick
2011/2/1 Sriram Ramkrishna :
>>
>> Facebook (or whatever social network) is just a way to transmit
>> informations, so feel free to propagate it by any way you feel is
>> right
>>
>> But I'd prefer to keep the feedback part in one location and no try to
>> monitor 10 differents websites.
>>
>
> Wha
> From whom ?
>
>
GNOME Enthusiasts I would label them.
> Facebook (or whatever social network) is just a way to transmit
> informations, so feel free to propagate it by any way you feel is
> right
>
> But I'd prefer to keep the feedback part in one location and no try to
> monitor 10 differents
2011/1/31 Sriram Ramkrishna :
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
>>
>> 2011/1/13 Andreas Nilsson :
>> > On 01/12/2011 07:49 PM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 2010/12/9 Paul Cutler:
>> >>>
>> >>> No one is currently maintaining the rPath images - I've talked to the
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> 2011/1/13 Andreas Nilsson :
> > On 01/12/2011 07:49 PM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> >>
> >> 2010/12/9 Paul Cutler:
> >>>
> >>> No one is currently maintaining the rPath images - I've talked to the
> >>> developers at the last 2 GNOME release
2011/1/13 Andreas Nilsson :
> On 01/12/2011 07:49 PM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
>>
>> 2010/12/9 Paul Cutler:
>>>
>>> No one is currently maintaining the rPath images - I've talked to the
>>> developers at the last 2 GNOME releases and they no longer have the
>>> time.
>>
>> So, it took more time than
On 01/12/2011 07:49 PM, Frederic Crozat wrote:
2010/12/9 Paul Cutler:
No one is currently maintaining the rPath images - I've talked to the
developers at the last 2 GNOME releases and they no longer have the
time.
So, it took more time than expected, but I have a first shot at a
working image :
2011/1/12 Frederic Crozat :
> 2010/12/9 Paul Cutler :
>> No one is currently maintaining the rPath images - I've talked to the
>> developers at the last 2 GNOME releases and they no longer have the
>> time.
>
> So, it took more time than expected, but I have a first shot at a
> working image :
>
>
2010/12/9 Paul Cutler :
> No one is currently maintaining the rPath images - I've talked to the
> developers at the last 2 GNOME releases and they no longer have the
> time.
So, it took more time than expected, but I have a first shot at a
working image :
http://susegallery.com/a/zksD5W/gnome-3
No one is currently maintaining the rPath images - I've talked to the
developers at the last 2 GNOME releases and they no longer have the
time.
Paul
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> I believe someone was maintaining an rpath appliance. The live cds used to
> come from
I believe someone was maintaining an rpath appliance. The live cds used to
come from that some time ago. I rather we only have one solution instead of
multiple. If Frederic is going to do it then I'll back off.
sri
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:20 +0100, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> > * As automated as possible but no more so. We probably at least need
> > some sort of manual QA to make sure that the top download link
> > is for a snapshot that isn't entirely broken.
> >
> > Anybody interested in taking on this p
2010/12/8 Owen Taylor :
> So currently trying out GNOME 3 requires one of two things: either
> installing some operating system under heavy development, or doing a
> day-long jhbuild from source.
>
> At the meeting today we were discussing that we'd like to have another
> option - that if we want t
So currently trying out GNOME 3 requires one of two things: either
installing some operating system under heavy development, or doing a
day-long jhbuild from source.
At the meeting today we were discussing that we'd like to have another
option - that if we want to do QA or user testing on the rele
23 matches
Mail list logo
