G2.12 with jhbuild

2005-06-13 Thread Cédric Marcone
hal doesn't build in jhbuild beacuse dbus didn't install dbus-gtype-specialized.h in $prefix/include/dbus-1.0/dbus I don't have any install-fu magic, so no patch : sorry ;) regs, -- cedric ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Re: G2.12 with jhbuild

2005-06-13 Thread Luis Villa
On 6/13/05, Cédric Marcone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hal doesn't build in jhbuild beacuse dbus didn't install dbus-gtype-specialized.h in $prefix/include/dbus-1.0/dbus I don't have any install-fu magic, so no patch : sorry ;) Yeah, a commit from Colin Walters (applying a patch from Ross

Re: G2.12 with jhbuild

2005-06-13 Thread Ross Burton
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 07:16 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: On 6/13/05, Cdric Marcone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hal doesn't build in jhbuild beacuse dbus didn't install dbus-gtype-specialized.h in $prefix/include/dbus-1.0/dbus I don't have any install-fu magic, so no patch : sorry ;) Yeah, a

Re: GNOME 2.11/2.12 targeting GTK+ 2.8 (ie cairo based)

2005-06-13 Thread Morten Welinder
For non-local servers without Render, Cairo will allow us to eliminate the round-trips... a huge win. Show me the money! Back in the real world, new code goes in and someone files a performance bug. Then you, Owen, seem to take that as a personal insult and close it as NOTABUG or WONTFIX.

Re: G2.12 with jhbuild

2005-06-13 Thread Colin Walters
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 12:42 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: Hackish patch to fix this attached. Expect something similar and some other patches which slipped through the cracks to be committed later today I added a fix for this, not quite that patch but similar. signature.asc Description: This

Re: G2.12 with jhbuild

2005-06-13 Thread Luis Villa
And the tinderbox succeeds now (at least, hal does :). Thanks... Luis On 6/13/05, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 12:42 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: Hackish patch to fix this attached. Expect something similar and some other patches which slipped through the

Re: G2.12 with jhbuild

2005-06-13 Thread Cédric Marcone
eog from CVS doesn't build with jhbuild : configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 = 2.6.0 gdk-pixbuf-2.0 = 2.4.0 gnome-vfs-2.0 = 2.5.91 libgnomeui-2.0 = 2.5.92 libglade-2.0 = 2.3.6 libart-2.0 = 2.3.16 libexif = 0.5.12 libexif = 0.5.12) were not met. The only thing that was not built

Re: G2.12 with jhbuild

2005-06-13 Thread Cédric Marcone
Le lundi 13 juin 2005 19:48 +0200, Cdric Marcone a crit : eog from CVS doesn't build with jhbuild : configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 = 2.6.0 gdk-pixbuf-2.0 = 2.4.0 gnome-vfs-2.0 = 2.5.91 libgnomeui-2.0 = 2.5.92 libglade-2.0 = 2.3.6 libart-2.0 = 2.3.16 libexif = 0.5.12

Re: G2.12 with jhbuild

2005-06-13 Thread James Henstridge
Cdric Marcone wrote: Le lundi 13 juin 2005 19:48 +0200, Cdric Marcone a crit : eog from CVS doesn't build with jhbuild : configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 = 2.6.0 gdk-pixbuf-2.0 = 2.4.0 gnome-vfs-2.0 = 2.5.91 libgnomeui-2.0 = 2.5.92 libglade-2.0 = 2.3.6 libart-2.0 =

Re: building GNOME 2.11 on x86_64 using jhbuild

2005-06-13 Thread Pat Suwalski
Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote: Hi, In the last couple of days i've built gnome-2.11 using jhbuild about 10 times so far. It builds fine (uncovered some gcc4-related bugs, filed them and they're fixed; apply a hal patch to n-c-b etc.). This is on a Fedora system, with up-to-date packages from

Re: building GNOME 2.11 on x86_64 using jhbuild

2005-06-13 Thread Pat Suwalski
Pat Suwalski wrote: I was hoping to test your theory this evening, but I can't get very far in the build, which dies at gtk because of: ./.libs/libgtk-x11-2.0.so: undefined reference to `g_utf8_collate_key_for_filename' On further thought, this must be because it's trying to link against