Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
Hi Federico, Thing is, most of these annoyances you mention --well known annoyances, everyone has them actually--, are distro-related, not Gnome-related. For example, the video codecs is a legal issue that a distro must decide what to do with it. Gnome can not include these codecs, neither fix O

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:14 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: Hi, Eugenia, > The idea was that this would be a Gnome-sponsored poll and it would attract > people from many sites, not just osnews or this mailing list. The idea would > be to get at least 300,000 people vote (I can get you 50-60,00

Re: New external dependency: iso-codes ?

2005-03-07 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 22:26 +0100, Christian Persch wrote: > There are two ways to get translated language/locale names: > > - If you only want to support a fixed set, you can proceed as with any > other translatable strings. Say, you have "Engligh (United Kingdom)". > You store those 2 separatel

New menu system.

2005-03-07 Thread Scott
How will the new menu system as of 2.10 work? Will I just have to edit one file? Do I need to mess with .desktop/.directory files? How will I reorder entries and such? Thanks, Scott Shawcroft ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gno

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Elijah Newren
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:19:08 +, Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: > >> allow voluntary up front contributions but the user chooses which > >> bounty to attach it to so popular stuff quickly builds up into big > >> bounties > > > > At first sounds good, but t

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Jamie McCracken
Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: allow voluntary up front contributions but the user chooses which bounty to attach it to so popular stuff quickly builds up into big bounties At first sounds good, but there is a problem here: Quickly, a casual user will need to pay more than he would normally pay Appl

gnome-volume-manager branched

2005-03-07 Thread Robert Love
I branched gnome-volume-manager ahead of the 2.10 release. The 2.10 tree is now on the "gnome-2-10" branch. The current version is 1.2.0. The development tree is HEAD. The current version is 1.3.0. Keep on truckin, Robert Love ___ desktop-

gnome-system-tools and system-tools-backends have been branched

2005-03-07 Thread Carlos Garnacho
gnome-2-10 branch is for stable stuff, HEAD for crackpipe deliriums Regards ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
allow voluntary up front contributions but the user chooses which bounty to attach it to so popular stuff quickly builds up into big bounties At first sounds good, but there is a problem here: Quickly, a casual user will need to pay more than he would normally pay Apple or MS to buy their product

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 22:55, Danilo Šegan wrote: > Today at 23:07, Damon Chaplin wrote: > > > PS. I do think discussing how to incorporate user feedback into the > > development cycle is appropriate on this mailing list. How much more > > relevant can you get?? > > And if it has been discussed be

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Jamie McCracken
Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: Well the secret to open source success is that the users and developers are the same people. What really disappoints me is this: When comparing closed source to OSS, people will just say how "open" and "community-friendly" OSS is. When comparing OSS to closed source th

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
Well the secret to open source success is that the users and developers are the same people. What really disappoints me is this: When comparing closed source to OSS, people will just say how "open" and "community-friendly" OSS is. When comparing OSS to closed source though, suddenly everything i

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Danilo Šegan
Today at 23:07, Damon Chaplin wrote: > PS. I do think discussing how to incorporate user feedback into the > development cycle is appropriate on this mailing list. How much more > relevant can you get?? And if it has been discussed before, and a conclusion has been made? No, don't answer this, i

ANNOUNCE: GDM 2.6.0.8 (stable), the "Next Release is 2.8" release

2005-03-07 Thread Brian Cameron
I forgot to update the Subject line in the last post. This release is 2.6.0.8 and not 2.6.0.7. *sigh* Sorry for the double post. OOGA (If you have no clue what gdm is, skip a few paragraphs down first) I've cc:ed the desktop-devel-list on this announcement because I I think it is a good ide

[Fwd: ANNOUNCE: GDM 2.6.0.7 (stable), the "SuperLate(tm)" release]]

2005-03-07 Thread Brian Cameron
OOGA (If you have no clue what gdm is, skip a few paragraphs down first) I've cc:ed the desktop-devel-list on this announcement because I I think it is a good idea to put Interface Change notification in release notes. I also think it is a good idea to announce upcoming interface changes when

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:21:30 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >A feature will be implemented if and only if there is a developer who wants > >to implement it, regardless of the number of votes it's received. > Which is exactly why open source software will never replace commer

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 19:41, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: > >and they don't vote in web polls on osnews > > nobody said anything about this being an osnews project (might get hosted > there, but not being an osnews project). I needed this to be an *official > gnome* project, and send out the news o

Re: New external dependency: iso-codes ?

2005-03-07 Thread Danilo Šegan
Today at 21:15, Christian Persch wrote: > I'd like to add a new external dependency to GNOME Desktop: the > "iso-codes" package. It's available from cvs > [http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-isocodes/] and tarball > [http://people.debian.org/~mckinstry/iso-codes-0.45.tar.gz]. FWIW, you have my

Re: New external dependency: iso-codes ?

2005-03-07 Thread Danilo Šegan
Hi Simos, Today at 22:01, Simos Xenitellis wrote: > It looks more canonical to me to make the dependancy to the Translation > Project. You got it a bit mixed up :) Translation Project (TP) is basically for other programs what GTP is for Gnome: a translation project. You cannot "add a dependenc

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Rob Adams
Well the secret to open source success is that the users and developers are the same people. Projects where developers aren't users tend to wallow in decay and misery. This is why, for example, there isn't much in the way of open source children's software, or open source tax preparation software

Re: New external dependency: iso-codes ?

2005-03-07 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, Le lundi 07 mars 2005 Ã 20:44 +, Bastien Nocera a Ãcrit : > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 21:15 +0100, Christian Persch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to add a new external dependency to GNOME Desktop: the > > "iso-codes" package. It's available from cvs > > [http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pk

Re: New external dependency: iso-codes ?

2005-03-07 Thread Fernando Herrera
El lun, 07-03-2005 a las 20:44 +, Bastien Nocera escribiÃ: > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 21:15 +0100, Christian Persch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to add a new external dependency to GNOME Desktop: the > > "iso-codes" package. It's available from cvs > > [http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-is

Re: New external dependency: iso-codes ?

2005-03-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 21:15 +0100, Christian Persch wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to add a new external dependency to GNOME Desktop: the > "iso-codes" package. It's available from cvs > [http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-isocodes/] and tarball > [http://people.debian.org/~mckinstry/iso-codes-0.45.

New external dependency: iso-codes ?

2005-03-07 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, I'd like to add a new external dependency to GNOME Desktop: the "iso-codes" package. It's available from cvs [http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-isocodes/] and tarball [http://people.debian.org/~mckinstry/iso-codes-0.45.tar.gz]. Using this package will remove the duplicated translations of

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Mystilleef
Stabilizing software is a more worthwhile endeavor than attending feature requests, some of which are unreasonable. Sometimes, users think they know what's best for them, when they don't. By their very nature, features and/or enhancements take a back seat to bugs that make software unstable or unre

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Luis Villa
I would point out that if you want to discuss actual market research (/not/ online polling) then the discussion could be continued on marketing-list. /no/ part of the discussion is d-d-l appropriate. Luis On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:55:24 -0700, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 07 Ma

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Elijah Newren
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:41:56 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >and they don't vote in web polls on osnews > > nobody said anything about this being an osnews project (might get hosted > there, but not being an osnews project). I needed this to be an *official

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
and they don't vote in web polls on osnews nobody said anything about this being an osnews project (might get hosted there, but not being an osnews project). I needed this to be an *official gnome* project, and send out the news on the announcement mailing lists too (and then have news sites lin

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Shaun McCance
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:14 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: >>I've seen hundreds of web polls > >The idea was that this would be a Gnome-sponsored poll and it would attract >people from many sites, not just osnews or this mailing list. The idea would >be to get at least 300,000 people vote (I ca

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:24 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: > >unless you happened to be one of the top 100 customers and had a personal > >Microsoft rep? > > On whether MSFT or AAPL will implement most feature requests in 1 year, I > wouldn't bet on it (yet, they do know what kind of features

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
That poll still only asks those, who read mls, /., osnews or whatever, which just don't represent the "average" user. It's way better than taking no opinion whatsoever. 300,000 people, is still, three hundrend thousand people. I'd be interested in how exactly you determined that. You don't need p

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Markus Bertheau
Ð ÐÐÐ, 2005-03-07 Ñ 11:14 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru ÐÐÑÐ: > >I've seen hundreds of web polls > > The idea was that this would be a Gnome-sponsored poll and it would attract > people from many sites, not just osnews or this mailing list. The idea would > be to get at least 300,000 people vote (I

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
unless you happened to be one of the top 100 customers and had a personal Microsoft rep? On whether MSFT or AAPL will implement most feature requests in 1 year, I wouldn't bet on it (yet, they do know what kind of features are needed, because they do market research, unlike Gnome). But since one

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Ross Burton
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 10:21 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: > Without market research to find out what "people want" you are codemning > your software to be "the software of its developers" instead of the > "software of the people". It is a short-sighted view on the evolution of the > project.

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
I've seen hundreds of web polls The idea was that this would be a Gnome-sponsored poll and it would attract people from many sites, not just osnews or this mailing list. The idea would be to get at least 300,000 people vote (I can get you 50-60,000 voters out of the 250,000 daily osnews readers,

Epiphany and Epiphany Extensions branched

2005-03-07 Thread Christian Persch
Hi, Epiphany Epiphany Extensions have branched for GNOME 2.10. The branch is called "gnome-2-10". @gnome-i18n: Since modules not in desktop can only have one branch listed on the translationstatus page, please stay with HEAD for Epiphany Extensions. However, translators should also update the gno

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Havoc Pennington
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:36 -0600, Matt T. Proud wrote: > I do not want to belabor this issue and make any more of you angry, but > I do think that what you have posed here is still less-than-ideal, for I > have, on countless occasions, submitted and seen other people's patches > go neglected for e

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Havoc Pennington
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 10:21 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: > > Havoc, about users writing docs and analysis when they want a particular > feature: *I am* going to write such an analysis for each one of my 20 > feature requests and then file them on bugzilla. Then, I will sit back and > watch

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Jamie McCracken
Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: A feature will be implemented if and only if there is a developer who wants to implement it, regardless of the number of votes it's received. Which is exactly why open source software will never replace commercial software or Microsoft. The answer or solution to the p

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
It works fantastically and it becomes better with every release I can say the exact same about Windows XP. But not everyone feels the same. Eugenia ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/des

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Elijah Newren
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:21:30 -0800, Eugenia Loli-Queru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lastly, I realize that Gnome is not a democracy. It is still governed by its > developers and I am perfectly ok with that. But that's not a reason to shut > off the users out of the procedure and only "use" them fo

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Jens Bech Madsen
Pardon the possibly off-topic posting, but: man, 07 03 2005 kl. 10:21 -0800, skrev Eugenia Loli-Queru: > Lastly, I realize that Gnome is not a democracy. It is still governed by its > developers and I am perfectly ok with that. But that's not a reason to shut > off the users out of the procedure

Re: gdm2 string freeze breakage

2005-03-07 Thread Brian Cameron
Christian: There has recently been an unannounced string freeze breakage in the string frozen gdm2 HEAD branch. There are two affected messages. First of all, it is this added message: #: gui/gdmlanguages.c:83 msgid "A-M|Chinese (HongKong)" That addition broke string freeze. As much

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
Rob, I don't know if you are representing the Gnome Project with your reply, but if you are (you are a Gnome developer anyway so I take it you have reasons to write what you wrote), here's my response to you, Havoc and the Gnome Project: A feature will be implemented if and only if there is a

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Elijah Newren
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:36:55 -0600, Matt T. Proud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do not want to belabor this issue and make any more of you angry, but > I do think that what you have posed here is still less-than-ideal, for I > have, on countless occasions, submitted and seen other people's patches

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Markus Bertheau
Ð ÐÑÑ, 2005-03-08 Ñ 03:15 +1100, Jeff Waugh ÐÐÑÐ: > (I really can't understand anyone asking to do less work *and* get special > treatment for their feature requests. Mind boggling.) That's just natural. It maybe doesn't appear fair, but it's natural. -- Markus Bertheau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> si

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Matt T. Proud
I do not want to belabor this issue and make any more of you angry, but I do think that what you have posed here is still less-than-ideal, for I have, on countless occasions, submitted and seen other people's patches go neglected for eons in bugzilla. It is very discouraging. Whose fault is it?

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Havoc Pennington
Voting is bad because most of the developers would actively ignore it, and flame anyone who suggested they should pay attention to it. Thus it's only going to get everyone (users and developers) thoroughly pissed off. If users want a feature and it's already in bugzilla, then the only useful thing

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Rob Adams
Bugzilla supports voting out of the box; we've previously discussed this and decided it wasn't in our best interests. A feature will be implemented if and only if there is a developer who wants to implement it, regardless of the number of votes it's received. -Rob On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 08:11 -08

gnome-utils branched

2005-03-07 Thread Vincent Noel
Hey all, gnome-utils has been branched for gnome 2.10. Stable releases should use the gnome-2-10 branch, while mind-blowing improvements will happen on HEAD. Cheers Vincent ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome

GnomeMeeting branched

2005-03-07 Thread Damien Sandras
I have branched GnomeMeeting. The stable branch, based on GnomeMeeting 1.2.1, is gnome-2-10 and the development branch is HEAD. The current "opal" branch containing GnomeMeeting 2.00 code will be merged in HEAD later this week. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeti

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Using a wiki would be a great way to give these feature requests added > exposure, not to mention to create a central place where users and > interested public could look and find what is--or at least could be--in > store for the next release. Ideally, the wiki will continue to be a sanctuary

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Eugenia Loli-Queru
Contact them directly (if they let you) Well, we need to contact them first to let us know if they allow us to contact them. :-D Anyways, I have an idea. What about if I write a php engine that lists the 50 or 100 more wanted feature requests as found in bugzilla (should take me 1-2 days to go

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Luis Villa
Nonononono. We are /not/ going to confuse developers even further and make them go to even /more/ different sources of information for feature requests for them. Contact them directly (if they let you) or file it in bugzilla. Luis On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:40:49 -0600, Matt T. Proud <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: roadmap status update/update request

2005-03-07 Thread Matt T. Proud
Using a wiki would be a great way to give these feature requests added exposure, not to mention to create a central place where users and interested public could look and find what is--or at least could be--in store for the next release. Were such a direction to be followed, would it be placed on

gnome-themes branched for 2.10

2005-03-07 Thread Calum Benson
gnome-themes is now branched for 2.10. Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Java Desktop System Group http://ie.sun.com +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Su

gnome-games branched

2005-03-07 Thread Callum McKenzie
I have branched gnome-games. The stable branch is gnome-2-10 and the development branch is HEAD. ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list