Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Llu, 2005-05-16 at 06:45, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 13:57 -0500, William Lovaton wrote:
Reading your little chat with the kernel guys it seems that there is
little benefit (or none) in reducing VM Size, why is that?
On Mon, 16 May 2005, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
There is a cost if the mapping has just a few random pages filled as you
have to fill in the whole page table heirarchy down to the page in
question.
Isn't it always the case that you have to fill in the page table
hierarchy down to the pages
On Llu, 2005-05-16 at 18:21, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Isn't it always the case that you have to fill in the page table
hierarchy down to the pages that you are actually using, regardless of
the size of the mapping? Why would a mapping of 8K with both pages
