> On 7/22/05, Sri Ramkrishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seems like the Ubuntu folks are coming up with the solutions anyways.
>
> I (and I expect others) would certainly be displeased if we became
> dependent on a proprietary tool to manage our bugs or release process. As
> long as it isn't
> Mark Shuttleworth, during his keynote at GUADEC, gave an awesome demo of
> Ubuntu's meta-bug tracker: they maintain pointers for the same bug across
> the different bug trackers of different distros, and thus they magically
> know when any of them manages to fix the bug. Everyone would save a
On 7/27/05, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:25 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
>
> > Also broken:
> > * gnome-vfs, since this commit:
> > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-vfs/ChangeLog?rev=1.2231&view=markup
>
> Should be fixed now. Sorry.
No problem, thanks for fi
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:25 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> Also broken:
> * gnome-vfs, since this commit:
> http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-vfs/ChangeLog?rev=1.2231&view=markup
Should be fixed now. Sorry.
--tml
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
de
Luis Villa wrote:
I'm guessing gnome-power-manager[1] and gnome-screensaver fall into the
2.14 time-frame.
And fast-user-switcher. I'd personally *love* to see that whole pile
land in 2.14.
My hope is that we can get a nice DBus interface to GDM going by then.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_b
Mark, thanks for these comments, they're definitely useful.
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 17:16 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> For various reasons I'm not entirely sure it makes sense to use D-BUS
> notification:
>
> - We're not actually interested in using the D-BUS service acquired by
>
On 7/27/05, Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 17:49 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > Punted to 2.13/2.14
> > * eggcups: this was pushed very late, and partially as a result there
> > * productivity/office suite: the discussions about where this would
>
> I'm guessing gn
On 7/27/05, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some things are sort of broken, and because I've been using the
> tinderbox box as a liveCD build machine they haven't been caught.
> Apologies if this ruins your plans to stay instead and play with HEAD
> all day. :) Culprits so far:
>
> * ORBit
Hi,
The session services stuff uses D-BUS activation in order to start the
desktop at login. It works something like:
- We request the service be started using StartServiceByName using
its D-BUS service name
- D-BUS launches the program and at some point the program acquires
o
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 12:18 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Seems like Metacity ought to have that placement algorithm built in so
> nautilus and any other span-multiple-xinerama windows can just work
> (after all, Metacity is the one that chooses "center on parent"
> already anyway, and appears to a
Hi all,
I dont know if this is possible, but I wan't to change
an environment variable in a gnome session, so the change
became visible to gnome without having to restart the
gnome session. Is this possible?
Thanks all
--
Fabio Rafael (f2r)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed m
Some things are sort of broken, and because I've been using the
tinderbox box as a liveCD build machine they haven't been caught.
Apologies if this ruins your plans to stay instead and play with HEAD
all day. :) Culprits so far:
* ORBit2
* gnome-applets xkb stuff
The direct committers have been n
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:02 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
>The patch is dead simple [1]. However, its acceptance into gnome-session
> may not be that 'simple'. I remember long debates going on here before,
> sorry
> couldn't find the thread. It was rather inconclusive then.
I thought the pr
Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 17:33 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
[1] In JDS, we simply set a atom by the name of "GNOME_SM_DESKTOP"
on the root window for legacy apps to ping that the session is GNOME.
Though this is not as sophiscated as you suggested, but we do document thi
14 matches
Mail list logo
