For those who follow the AuricApplet idea on live.gnome.org, those who
downloaded previous versions of my deskbar, or simply those who are
nostalgic for how epiphany used to be able to search from the address
bar, I announce the Deskbar Applet version 0.4. It's been a few months
coming.
It's
Hi,
Well, missing ku.po translation file breaks the building of gedit.
Making all in po
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/claudio/cvs/gnome2/gedit/po'
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `ku.po', needed by `ku.gmo'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/claudio/cvs/gnome2/gedit/po'
make[1]:
Il giorno dom, 11/09/2005 alle 16.57 +0200, Claudio Saavedra ha scritto:
Hi,
Well, missing ku.po translation file breaks the building of gedit.
It looks like Erdal forgot to cvs add the file, I temporarely removed ku
from configure.in.
ciao
___
It doesn't exist. I think a metacity-list would be really really
useful. Pretty please? :)
--
mvh Björn
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Rodney Dawes wrote:
What happens if the version number is already greater than that of
Gnome?
Doesn't happen too often. Only applications sofar are gcalctool (5.6.19)
and dasher (3.2.18). An option might be to rename the packages to for
instance gnome-calculator and gnome-dasher and then
Hi all,
This may sound a rather simplistic question, and I fully acknowledge
that there may not actually be an answer, but has there been any
targetted timeframes for when Topaz hacking will begin?
I realise that Topaz is currently in the ideas stage, but how will the
finalised ideas and
The keyword part is the worse feature in Firefox, and looks like the
worse in Deskbar as well. In Epiphany, IMDB would just be another choice
in the drop-down menu (it looks like there's only searching the web via
google in there most of the time).
Obviously, the Epiphany developers have
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 21:08 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
It doesn't exist. I think a metacity-list would be really really
useful. Pretty please? :)
Useful for what? ;-) ... all the doing work kind of discussions seem
to be adequately handled by bugzilla. And I can certainly imagine a lot
of
On 9/11/05, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't exist. I think a metacity-list would be really really
useful. Pretty please? :)
As Havoc, said, I think the big question is finding out what problems
this would address or what new advantages it would bring. I believe
there may be
On 9/11/05, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there are topics that really need a list, they are on topic for
desktop-devel-list, usability list, and other gnome lists. I don't think
we need a metacity list until the metacity-specific content becomes a
significant amount of traffic
10 matches
Mail list logo
