Re: Eel and Nautilus branched

2005-10-04 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 15:37 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote: Am Montag, den 03.10.2005, 09:28 -0400 schrieb Luis Villa: On 10/3/05, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eel and Nautilus has been branched for 2.13. 2.12.x work go in the gnome-2-12 branch. Any interesting plans

Sound Juicer branched

2005-10-04 Thread Ross Burton
Sound Juicer has branched for development, stable branch is gnome-2-12 as expected. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.burtonini.com./

Re: Sound Juicer branched

2005-10-04 Thread Luis Villa
Any plans for 2.13? [Yes, I'm going to ask this every time I see one of these :) Luis On 10/4/05, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sound Juicer has branched for development, stable branch is gnome-2-12 as expected. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL

Re: GNOME-Applets Branched

2005-10-04 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Luis Villa In the future, you have updated: http://live.gnome.org/RoadMap to indicate what wonderful new features applets will have in 2.13. Luis (insert air guitar here) EXCELLENT! - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2006: Dunedin, New Zealand http://linux.conf.au/

Re: GNOME-Applets Branched

2005-10-04 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Luis Villa but your mail client probably looked at my Mail-Followup-To header and complied. :-) gmail displays that to the user as reply-to, which is damned irritating. EVIDENCE OF EVIL! - Jeff -- EuroOSCON: October 17th-20thhttp://conferences.oreillynet.com/eurooscon/

MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
Hi I have had this patch around for some time, and seems to work pretty well, so sending for comments and/or approval. It just makes gnome-session display the /etc/motd file on startup, using libnotify if available, or an ugly dialog if not. The 2 new files are to be placed in

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hi Rodrigo, On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 17:40 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: Hi I have had this patch around for some time, and seems to work pretty well, so sending for comments and/or approval. It just makes gnome-session display the /etc/motd file on startup, using libnotify if available, or an

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Mark McLoughlin I the first thing worth discussing is why?. Why is it a good idea to show /etc/motd at login? It's very handy for sysadmins to display information to the user at login. I've used zenity and very bad gnome-session hacks for this in the past. Our audience of

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 16:48 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hi Rodrigo, On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 17:40 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: Hi I have had this patch around for some time, and seems to work pretty well, so sending for comments and/or approval. It just makes gnome-session display

shared memory usage tool - exmap

2005-10-04 Thread John Berthels
Hi, I've been working on a tool to help accurately account for shared memory usage amongst multiple processes (following some of the suggestions from the gnome wiki). This was suggested to me as a relevant place to mention it - if not then sorry, and please let me know if any other gnome lists

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 01:53 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: quote who=Mark McLoughlin I the first thing worth discussing is why?. Why is it a good idea to show /etc/motd at login? It's very handy for sysadmins to display information to the user at login. I've used zenity and very bad

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Pat Suwalski
Mark McLoughlin wrote: What kind of information is it especially handy for? Perhaps when you upgrade the desktop and you want to warn people that stuff has changed? But not for stuff like internet will be down for a while today because people may not actually log out that often? At a

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 17:11 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 01:53 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: quote who=Mark McLoughlin I the first thing worth discussing is why?. Why is it a good idea to show /etc/motd at login? It's very handy for sysadmins to display

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 12:30 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote: Is login the best time to show this information or would you prefer if the user saw it immediately? It might be nice to have GDM display this kind of information, polling for changes to /etc/motd every minute or so instead. some

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 18:24, Rodrigo Moya wrote: that is probably a problem, to show always the same message in systems that have nothing interesting in that file. The problem is how to deal with this? Have some [] Never show me this message again button which remembers the last MOTD

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 09:21 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: It would be nice if it detects a change in the MOTD and notifies the user that it's changed (unless of course it already does that). it already does that -- Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 18:33 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Le mardi 04 octobre 2005 à 17:40 +0200, Rodrigo Moya a écrit : Hi I have had this patch around for some time, and seems to work pretty well, so sending for comments and/or approval. It just makes gnome-session display the

Re: shared memory usage tool - exmap

2005-10-04 Thread John Berthels
On 04 Oct 2005 20:58:59 +0200, Soeren Sandmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Berthels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I guess I'm saying it may be worth a second look :-) Well, it locks up my system hard (2.6.12-1.1446_FC5, ie. Fedora rawhide from a while back which might explain it), but if it

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-04 Thread Elijah Newren
On 10/4/05, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just found out a missing argument in a call to g_snprintf, in logview. Attached patch fixes it. Ok to commit? Is bugzilla not working? ;-) ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 16:27 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: On 10/4/05, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just found out a missing argument in a call to g_snprintf, in logview. Attached patch fixes it. Ok to commit? Is bugzilla not working? ;-) I guess it is, but usually it is

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 00:30 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 16:27 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: On 10/4/05, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just found out a missing argument in a call to g_snprintf, in logview. Attached patch fixes it. Ok to commit?

Re: gnome-utils patch

2005-10-04 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 23:35 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 00:30 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 16:27 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: On 10/4/05, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just found out a missing argument in a call to g_snprintf,

Re: MOTD implementation in gnome-session

2005-10-04 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 06:43:26PM +0200, Markus Jonsson wrote: What about when the system shuts down? Can I be informed about that? Can I be alerted and logged out in a nice way when someone else runs shutdown -h on the system? If you're in this situation it's most likely not going to be at