Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 17:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
I'm not convinced that making HEAD unusable for everybody by enforcing
this in gnome-session is the way forward. For one thing, it will
drastically reduce the amount of testing that HEAD gets. I think making
this
Seg, 2005-11-07 às 01:36 -0500, Matthias Clasen escreveu:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 17:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hey,
The next releases of glib (HEAD and glib-2-8) will support a new debug
flag for the G_DEBUG environment variable: fatal_criticals. This make
the program crash on
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 15:17 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Seg, 2005-11-07 às 01:36 -0500, Matthias Clasen escreveu:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 17:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hey,
The next releases of glib (HEAD and glib-2-8) will support a new debug
flag for the G_DEBUG
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 15:17 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Seg, 2005-11-07 às 01:36 -0500, Matthias Clasen escreveu:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 17:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
What do you think?
I'm not convinced that making
Seg, 2005-11-07 às 17:39 +0100, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
escreveu:
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 15:17 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
Seg, 2005-11-07 às 01:36 -0500, Matthias Clasen escreveu:
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 17:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hey,
The next
On 11/7/05, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could also mean that developers start thinking twice before
adding a g_warning, and start using g_message instead, thus defeating is
purpose. g_warning is for reporting real problems, but no critical
ones; for critical
On Sun, 2005-11-06 at 17:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
The next releases of glib (HEAD and glib-2-8) will support a new debug
flag for the G_DEBUG environment variable: fatal_criticals. This make
the program crash on critical warnings.
I'm all for this.
One thing we discussed on IRC is to
