Re: Supporting po/LINGUAS in 2.16

2006-04-13 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 10 avril 2006 à 17:00 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit : It has just come to my attention that one of the GNOME Goals is to port GNOME to using the po/LINGUAS file for 2.16, rather than having the LINGUAS listed directly in configure.{in,ac}. http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PoLinguas is

Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories

2006-04-13 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 11 avril 2006 à 23:22 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit : OK, So, in accordance with previous correspondence I sent about the use of po/LINGUAS rather than ALL_LINGUAS in configure.{in,ac}, I hereby present to you, the Correct (TM) way to migrate to using the LINGUAS file in your po

Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories

2006-04-13 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006, Vincent Untz wrote: Le mardi 11 avril 2006 à 23:22 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit : OK, So, in accordance with previous correspondence I sent about the use of po/LINGUAS rather than ALL_LINGUAS in configure.{in,ac}, I hereby present to you, the Correct (TM) way to

Re: gnome-control-center has been branched for 2.14

2006-04-13 Thread Ross Burton
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 17:23 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: If any particular capplet were to just be nuked from control-center, I would prefer it to be the resolution capplet. Opening a dialog to switch between resolutions seems rather crappy to me. It would be nice to have that ability in a

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Daniel Carrera
Stanislav Brabec wrote: Gconf seems like an incredibly complicated way of adding an icon. And it doesn't seem to work at all. There is no connection between what I see on gconf-editor and the icons I see on my desktop. Yes, for panel it is true. But there is one chance, much simpler with

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Daniel Carrera
Frederic Ruaudel wrote: Hi Daniel, I'm not sure it is exactly what you are looking for, but maybe these 3 articles from redhat magazine can help you. I'd like to add an icon to the panel so that when a new user is created he sees the new icon. Sounds simple, no? Thank you for trying

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Christophe Fergeau
Le jeudi 13 avril 2006 à 10:23 +0100, Daniel Carrera a écrit : Yes, I know what XML is, and I'm quite comfortable with XML. But that doesn't tell me what any of of those files means or how they work. They really aren't self-describing and there are 124 of them just in my ~/.gconf directory.

Re: System-wide settings for the panel?

2006-04-13 Thread Vincent Untz
Hi Daniel, On Tue, April 11, 2006 16:41, Daniel Carrera wrote: Hello, I've been trying to figure out how to change the system wise settings for the Gnome panel (e.g. add/remove icons). I can't find this anywhere. All the documentation around is for the end-user, not for admins. I've

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 10:25 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote: Frederic Ruaudel wrote: Hi Daniel, I'm not sure it is exactly what you are looking for, but maybe these 3 articles from redhat magazine can help you. I'd like to add an icon to the panel so that when a new user is created

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Vincent Untz
On Wed, April 12, 2006 13:41, Daniel Carrera wrote: Stanislav Brabec wrote: Thanks to all who gave suggestions. One of the suggestions turns out to work quite well: 1. Configure Gnome just the way I want it. 2. sudo cp ~/.g* /etc/skel Af least for .gconfd it is a bad idea. [snip: also .gconf

Re: System-wide settings for the panel?

2006-04-13 Thread Daniel Carrera
Vincent Untz wrote: I would be very grateful if someone could tell me how I can change the Gnome global panel settings (in particular, add/remove icons and menu entries) so that any new users get the settings I pick. Assuming you're using Ubuntu, you need to modify

Re: gnome-applets branched

2006-04-13 Thread Luis Villa
Plans! Plans! On 4/13/06, Davyd Madeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: gnome-applets has been branched for active development towards GNOME 2.16. --d -- Davyd Madeley http://www.davyd.id.au/ 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA ___

Re: gnome-applets branched

2006-04-13 Thread Davyd Madeley
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 09:52:14AM -0400, Luis Villa wrote: Plans! Plans! 1) Replace gtik 2) other stuff 3) ... 4) profit! -- Davyd Madeley http://www.davyd.id.au/ 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA ___ desktop-devel-list mailing

librsvg has been branched

2006-04-13 Thread Dominic Lachowicz
We branched a little while ago. Mundane 2.16 plans include: *) Working with Inkscape to support multiImage *) Supporting whatever SVG 1.2 features that Cairo 1.2's SVG backend requires, so that it doesn't need to do image fallbacks *) Translating the strings (something that's long overdue) *)

Re: gnome-applets branched

2006-04-13 Thread Ikke
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 22:00 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote: 4) profit! Good luck ;) ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Daniel Carrera
Elijah Newren wrote: Daniel, Thanks for all your patience. I see from another email that sabayon has worked for you, which is great. That makes your whole below email sounds like perfect marketing material for sabayon now. :-) Please keep letting us know where any other warts are so we can

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread James Henstridge
Daniel Carrera wrote: Chipzz wrote: For .gconf you should prefer root's gconf database (but I still see a problem, that such customization is overwritten by a subsequent packages update, at least with the default gconf path). It should be pointed out that for debian (and I think also

Re: System-wide settings for the panel?

2006-04-13 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
I hope that you might also contribute your time in helping to make Sabayon more useful for other systems administrators who might also want to do the kind of things we're doing. It'll be useful to understand the kind of models systems administrator would want. sri On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 17:31 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote: Elijah Newren wrote: Daniel, Thanks for all your patience. I see from another email that sabayon has worked for you, which is great. That makes your whole below email sounds like perfect marketing material for sabayon now. :-)

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 09:45 +0100, Daniel Carrera wrote: Chipzz wrote: For .gconf you should prefer root's gconf database (but I still see a problem, that such customization is overwritten by a subsequent packages update, at least with the default gconf path). It should be pointed out

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Daniel Carrera
I'd just like to say that Shaun's description is right on the mark. I couldn't have summarized the state of Gconf and Sabayon so well. Best, Daniel. Shaun McCance wrote: I see that you've already found Sabayon to be a good solution, but just for information's sake: Using gconf-editor is a

Re: LINGUAS file support in po directories

2006-04-13 Thread Rodney Dawes
Looks OK to me. Perhaps you could add a note about the no/nb thing too, so that we can ensure all the modules are using nb now as the locale name. That would help alleviate the concerns that Joe Shaw brought up yesterday in his blog entry about po/LINGUAS. -- dobey On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 08:52

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Brian Cameron
Daniel: I think you are very right that being able to add icons to the panel is something that many OEM's would like to do. I think nobody has yet asked for this feature loud enough. The main problem here is with exposing the GConf configuration interfaces that control the appearance of the

Re: Solution for OEMs/Gnome

2006-04-13 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 13:50 -0700, Brian Cameron wrote: Daniel: I think you are very right that being able to add icons to the panel is something that many OEM's would like to do. I think nobody has yet asked for this feature loud enough. They have, and Sabayon was created, and Sabayon was

Re: Fwd: [gnome-love] Participate to the GNOME Goals and feel the love!

2006-04-13 Thread Rodney Dawes
You are welcome to disagree all you want. You are still wrong. 3d is a very different beast from SVG. You can not create a single SVG that will render properly at different sizes. In 3D games, and the like, where even at a distance, the object still looks good, this is because of how the core

Re: About-me-password backend

2006-04-13 Thread Johannes H. Jensen
I agree, if we are going to support PAM, this is something we have to look at. Note that I'm currently just working on bug #321567, which is about usability issues in the dialog, so I'm just using what's already there. I would be happy to improve more than the usability though! I thought

Re: Fwd: [gnome-love] Participate to the GNOME Goals and feel the love!

2006-04-13 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 18:24 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 02:13 +0200, Esben Stien wrote: I don't agree;). If you make a simple big one and scale it down, it'll still look good. You don't make an icon small; at least in my view and I do a lot of 3d modeling. I never think