Re: GNOME 2.20.0 beta 1

2007-08-16 Thread Frederic Peters
Hello, Kjartan Maraas wrote: I'm still in the process of building the release and have uploaded the modulesets and versions file to the ftp server so far. Hit a few snags here and there so it has taken me longer than I wanted. gnome-suites-2.19.90.modules is missing tarballs for new modules,

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 17:15 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: On 8/14/07, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 21:01 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: (It seems some of my mail is going missing. This will screw up the threading but whatever.) Rodrigo Moya wrote:

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 14:32 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: It's like having: set_size get_size set_text get_text set_whatever get_whatever ... VS set_prop get_prop You can do your life easier with the _prop combo, like: set_prop(prop_var, prop_val) In my humble

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 14:33 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 14:32 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: It's like having: set_size get_size set_text get_text set_whatever get_whatever ... VS set_prop get_prop You can do your life easier with

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:07 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: We are talking about providing an easy way for apps to call actions on other apps, right? For complex interfaces, you need a proper DBus interface, but what if my app just has a DoWhatever action? Should I create a new DBus interface just

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 14:59 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:07 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: We are talking about providing an easy way for apps to call actions on other apps, right? For complex interfaces, you need a proper DBus interface, but what if my app just has a

Re: DynamicMimeTypes

2007-08-16 Thread Shaun McCance
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 21:34 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:17 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 23:18 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: Hi List Applications like Rhythmbox and Totem have content handling capabilities that are dependent on GStreamer.

Re: DynamicMimeTypes

2007-08-16 Thread Alex Jones
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 10:04 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 21:34 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: The only difference between this and what I suggested is that you are giving an explicit path to a script (what I was calling a handler) to be run. It's the same idea. OK, I

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Alex Jones
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 15:07 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 14:33 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: The problem with that is you're one more step away from the canonical object.property = value. If you're adding an indirection level to the DBus mechanism with

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Nicolas Trangez
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 18:05 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: media_player_proxy = dbus_g_proxy_new_for_name (connection, org.gnome.Rhythmbox, /org/gnome/Rhythmbox, org.gnome.MediaPlayer); // Any random interface here error = NULL; dbus_g_proxy_call (proxy, Pause, error,

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Alex Jones
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 19:00 +0200, Nicolas Trangez wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 18:05 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: media_player_proxy = dbus_g_proxy_new_for_name (connection, org.gnome.Rhythmbox, /org/gnome/Rhythmbox, org.gnome.MediaPlayer); // Any random interface here

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 06:32:32PM +0100, Alex Jones wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 19:00 +0200, Nicolas Trangez wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 18:05 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: media_player_proxy = dbus_g_proxy_new_for_name (connection, org.gnome.Rhythmbox, /org/gnome/Rhythmbox,

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Nicolas Trangez
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 20:26 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 06:32:32PM +0100, Alex Jones wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 19:00 +0200, Nicolas Trangez wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 18:05 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: media_player_proxy = dbus_g_proxy_new_for_name (connection,

Re: org.gnome.Application DBus Interface

2007-08-16 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 20:26 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 06:32:32PM +0100, Alex Jones wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 19:00 +0200, Nicolas Trangez wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 18:05 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: media_player_proxy = dbus_g_proxy_new_for_name (connection,

Media Player interface (was org.gnome.Application)

2007-08-16 Thread Alex Jones
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:37 -0500, Scott J. Harmon wrote: Alex Jones wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 19:00 +0200, Nicolas Trangez wrote: On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 18:05 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: media_player_proxy = dbus_g_proxy_new_for_name (connection, org.gnome.Rhythmbox,

Re: GNOME 2.20.0 beta 1

2007-08-16 Thread Claudio Saavedra
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 21:29 +0300, Lucas Rocha wrote: This would free the release team from this repetitive and boring task... But Vincent reminder emails are funny! Claudio -- Claudio Saavedra [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ desktop-devel-list mailing

Re: Media Player interface (was org.gnome.Application)

2007-08-16 Thread Nicolas Trangez
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 21:50 +0100, Alex Jones wrote: For general desktop co-ordination, signals are your friend. Media players should be listening for actions to respond to, not being explicitly told to pause or mute. Agree. Which is something I'd love to tackle (hotkey handling daemon, gvm

Re: GNOME 2.20.0 beta 1

2007-08-16 Thread Kjartan Maraas
tor, 16.08.2007 kl. 12.18 +0200, skrev Frederic Peters: Hello, Kjartan Maraas wrote: I'm still in the process of building the release and have uploaded the modulesets and versions file to the ftp server so far. Hit a few snags here and there so it has taken me longer than I wanted.

Re: GNOME 2.20.0 beta 1

2007-08-16 Thread Elijah Newren
On 8/16/07, Kjartan Maraas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: tor, 16.08.2007 kl. 12.18 +0200, skrev Frederic Peters: Hello, Kjartan Maraas wrote: I'm still in the process of building the release and have uploaded the modulesets and versions file to the ftp server so far. Hit a few snags