quote who=Olav Vitters
I do understand this is heavy handed way of getting that information.
I'd suggest the heavy-handedness is just mistimed -- it would be totally OK
to announce that this would happen immediately *after* the release of 2.20,
as then it would simply be a property of the next
2007/8/29, Johan Dahlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Johan and all,
in general I think it is a very good idea to port PyGTK to Python 3.x
as soon as possible. The api must not be stable with the fist alpha
release, but it need to be stable at least with one of the first
betas. We'll have to port a
My apologies if this is the wrong list.
Would someone be so kind as to tell me what executable
and/or library is responsible for handling the corba
object reference file
/tmp/orbit-$USER/bonobo-activation-server-ior that
gets created when a user starts a gnome desktop
session? I'm assuming that
Fernando San Martín Woerner wrote:
El mié, 29-08-2007 a las 23:36 +0200, Andi Albrecht escribió:
2007/8/29, Johan Dahlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Johan and all,
in general I think it is a very good idea to port PyGTK to Python 3.x
as soon as possible. The api must not be stable with the
Johan Is it actually worth the pain to remove the old names?
Yes, at least in my opinion. From the Zen:
import this
The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
...
There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
...
The obvious way to make something into a
On Dom, 2007-09-02 at 13:09 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
On Sáb, 2007-08-25 at 10:39 -0700, Gabriel M. Elder wrote:
My apologies if this is the wrong list.
Would someone be so kind as to tell me what executable
and/or library is responsible for handling the corba
object
On 9/1/07, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quote who=Olav Vitters
I do understand this is heavy handed way of getting that information.
I'd suggest the heavy-handedness is just mistimed -- it would be totally OK
to announce that this would happen immediately *after* the release of 2.20,
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 21:39 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
I'm with Jeff and Vincent on this; I'm worried about the adverse
affect this could have on the release, given how close it is. Can we
consider delaying it until after 2.20 is out?
How hard would it be for someone to intersect all the
