Frankly, I'd like to see an s5 editor (inc. themes):
http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/s5/
That's nice, cause I thought about writing one (web-based of course)
about a year ago, but couldn't find motivation to complete it. Now
that I see I'm not the only one with those crazy ideas, maybe I'll
give
OOo is Gtk based for several years.
This is not true. OOo only uses Gtk themes, not Gtk widgets. Big
difference. Like the difference between firefox and epiphany.
What difference does it make to the users? It looks like it.
Hub
___
Introducing Gnupresent (as in New Present, not guh-noo present ;) )
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnupresent
We'll see how well this goes.
J French wrote:
Is this dead? I can't even find where to get the code. If it is indeed dead,
what replaced it?
Hi All:
The spec Calum is referring to is at the following URL:
http://accessibility.freestandards.org/a11yspecs/kbd/keyboard-access-func-spec.html
In particular, the Configuration and Setting Requirements table
contains the most pertinent information with respect to what needs to be
Le vendredi 02 novembre 2007 à 11:04 -0400, Hubert Figuiere a écrit :
OOo is Gtk based for several years.
This is not true. OOo only uses Gtk themes, not Gtk widgets. Big
difference. Like the difference between firefox and epiphany.
What difference does it make to the users? It
I'll throw in a positive comment for latex-beamer. If you're already
comfortable with LaTeX, beamer makes it very easy to put together very
nice/modern looking slides, with step-by-step reveals, even outputting
to a nice PDF that can be used for presenting on most any OS.
On Qui, 2007-11-01 at 14:15 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 13:57 -0400, J French wrote:
I hate OOo with a passion. It may be fine for Windows, but so many
other
applications are better under Linux. I was hoping there was something
GTK-based
for this as well.
On 02/11/2007, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/11/2007, Dylan McCall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
everyone's best interest to standardize this. All we need now is a
standard.
Ok, short answer to long mail - I'm at work so I shouldn't be reading
d-d-l :-)
On 02/11/2007, Dylan McCall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These search engines all provide similar outputs, do they not? What we
need, then, is a standard system that they can each fill in for via D-Bus,
or by replacing some small GNU-esque applications, with the assumption that
the distro's
Hi,
On 11/2/07, Denis Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use the xesam spec? We could just have one generic GNOME search
tool that sends xesam queries and presents the search results,
regardless of which search engine gave them us. This would require a
xesam interface for basic file
Ross Burton wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:44 +0100, Jan de Groot wrote:
since last upgrade of my arch, the gnome-keyring didn't work anymore.
When launching the gnome-keyring-manager tool, it told me, that no
keyring daemon was active, and the following message was shown on the
console:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 01:57:05PM -0400, J French wrote:
I hate OOo with a passion. It may be fine for Windows, but so many other
applications are better under Linux. I was hoping there was something
GTK-based
for this as well.
Perhaps it's time to start a new project.
There's also the
12 matches
Mail list logo
