On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 16:14 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
[snip]
there's a bug open against
Iagno in which a non-native English speaker has re-written the entire
game
from the ground-up adding multi-player; the diff is 4,000 lines. I
really
like where it's going but unfortunately, as
Hi,
2008/6/18 Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Neither will a key file or any other method unless you have some way of
uniquely identifying the window, and that window identifier can be used
when creating gconf keys.
Exactly. As discussed the last 500 times we had this thread ;-) GTK
needs an
Sorry, not paid attention in websites :)
Me is only with websites with flash.
Rodrigo
Em Qui, 2008-06-19 às 13:30 -0400, William Case escreveu:
Hi Rodrigo;
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 14:01 -0300, Rodrigo de Brum Chimainski wrote:
Hi Regards,
This also happens with me on sites with flash
I have thought about this for a while... This is the first thread
about decadence in gnome on desktop-devel, while the topic has been
discussed on planet.gnome.org for quite some time. It seems to me that
pgo is in a way usurping the mailinglist which have become rather
boring. Not much is posted
2008-06-19 klockan 04:14 skrev Michael Gratton:
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 17:46 +0200, Anders Feder wrote:
I have not discussed it directly with Tracker developers, but it's my
impression that they don't feel that Tracker is ready to support a
SPARQL interface for queries yet.
Ahh, right.
Sorry Michael, must have missed your e-mail among the digests last week.
tor, 19 06 2008 kl. 12:14 +1000, skrev Michael Gratton:
Ahh, right. Can something be constructed to translate SPARQL (or some
useful subset) into Tracker's query format?
A subset, yes, but as Wouter points out Tracker is
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Kalle Vahlman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2008/6/23 BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Pgo is good for getting to know the daily lives of gnome hackers and
stuff. But it shouldn't act as a general debating board. That's what
mailing lists are for.
I'd like
I seem to remember a time when there was an actual journalistic team
specifically editting and publishing summaries of what had been posted
within the community in the past week/month. What happened to that
effort? I suppose the volunteer editor(s) became occupied elsewhere or
something?
man, 23
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Anders Feder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I seem to remember a time when there was an actual journalistic team
specifically editting and publishing summaries of what had been posted
within the community in the past week/month. What happened to that
effort? I
A little note on the topic:
I've summarized the stack we're approaching between my talks with
Sebastian and the discussion here, at:
http://live.gnome.org/RDFStack
man, 23 06 2008 kl. 21:01 +0200, skrev Anders Feder:
Sorry Michael, must have missed your e-mail among the digests last week.
Jason:
We need to tap in to the wave of energy generated by the The Thread on
Planet Gnome. Already, it's apparent that the fervor that surrounded it has
started to dwindle. A ton of interesting ideas were thrown out and lot of
belly-aching about no one taking responsibility for making it
2008-06-23 klockan 21:01 skrev Anders Feder:
A subset, yes, but as Wouter points out Tracker is XESAM-based which
'only' cover simple query cases, so certain advanced SPARQL queries (in
particular 'join'-like operations) would map rather poorly into XESAM.
How such queries would be handled
Ah,
I have overheard late-night tales of this epic flamewar murmured in dark
corners of many a seedy IRC channel during my inquest into the history
of GNOMish metadata magicks, but had yet to peruse the transcription
scrolls for myself. I bid you thanks for the links ;)
man, 23 06 2008 kl. 23:56
2008/6/23 Wouter Bolsterlee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008-06-23 klockan 21:01 skrev Anders Feder:
A subset, yes, but as Wouter points out Tracker is XESAM-based which
'only' cover simple query cases, so certain advanced SPARQL queries (in
particular 'join'-like operations) would map rather poorly
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:24:48PM +0200, Anders Feder wrote:
I seem to remember a time when there was an actual journalistic team
specifically editting and publishing summaries of what had been posted
within the community in the past week/month. What happened to that
effort? I suppose the
15 matches
Mail list logo
