El dl 09 de 02 de 2009 a les 19:14 +, en/na Alberto Ruiz va
escriure:
2009/2/9 Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org:
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:16 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
- Are we just waiting for some corporate sponsors to pick up the docs
where Sun left them many years ago ?
On 2/10/09, Gil Forcada gforc...@gnome.org wrote:
Stormy is asking for ideas and topics for spend the advisory fundings,
so why not propose a hackfest-like meeting for documentation, by now all
hackfests have been related to programming and usability, maybe a
documentation+translation can
Hi
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:02 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:44 -0500, manoj kp kp wrote:
Hi,
I'm an egnineering student and thinking about modifying TOTEM MOVIE
PLAYER by inlcuding
* a LIBRARY in so as to keep track of all the files played once in the
Hi
In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 error.
Example:
http://crash.gnome.org/report/index/8d6249b4-f79f-11dd-8569-0007e9333148?date=2009-02-10-18
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 12:00 -0500, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
Hi
In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 error.
Example:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Hubert Figuiere h...@figuiere.net wrote:
Hi
In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 error.
Example:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 12:00 -0500 schrieb Hubert Figuiere:
Hi
In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 error.
Example:
Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 12:00 -0500 schrieb Hubert Figuiere:
Hi
In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 error.
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:25 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs were today moved over to git.
The old svn repositories will still work, but only in read-only mode.
Does this mean the GNOME move to git is complete and the git
repositories are now writeable
On 02/11/2009 12:54 PM, John Stowers wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:25 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs were today moved over to git.
The old svn repositories will still work, but only in read-only mode.
Does this mean the GNOME move to git is complete
Le jeudi 12 février 2009, à 09:54 +1300, John Stowers a écrit :
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:25 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs were today moved over to git.
The old svn repositories will still work, but only in read-only mode.
Does this mean the GNOME
Ahoi,
Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 12:00 -0500 schrieb Hubert Figuiere:
Is there any plan to remove Bug Buddy now that it has been made useless?
Your reasoning is strange. Wouldn't it make more sense to fix
crash.gnome.org? Or did we gave up on software quality?
Hej hej,
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 22:58 +0100 schrieb Tobias Mueller:
I'd say it'd be the best to remove that whole crash.gnome.org thing from
bugbuddy as there is obviously nobody who is able to manage that
platform. I assume that bugbuddy would then send to b.g.o only.
Before I'd be
2009/2/11 Tobias Mueller mue...@auftrags-killer.org:
I'd say it'd be the best to remove that whole crash.gnome.org thing from
bugbuddy as there is obviously nobody who is able to manage that platform. I
assume that bugbuddy would then send to b.g.o only.
I agree with dropping crash.g.o but I'd
14 matches
Mail list logo
