Shaun McCance schrieb:
Ever since automake 1.9, automake has been spewing garbage like
this when you try to build any module that uses gnome-doc-utils:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507336
Does anyone know what a fix would be? What are the rules for POSIX variable
name? Most hits
Le dimanche 15 février 2009, à 16:21 -0600, Shaun McCance a écrit :
It seems to me that, if we just require GNU make, we ought to
just pass -Wno-portability to automake.
Makes sense to me.
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
___
hi,
Shaun McCance schrieb:
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:16 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
- Are we just waiting for some corporate sponsors to pick up the docs
where Sun left them many years ago ?
Corporate contributions to the documentation team would be
welcome, but picking them up the way
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 11:27 +0200, Stefan Kost wrote:
Shaun McCance schrieb:
Ever since automake 1.9, automake has been spewing garbage like
this when you try to build any module that uses gnome-doc-utils:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507336
Does anyone know what a fix
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:01:04AM -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 11:27 +0200, Stefan Kost wrote:
Shaun McCance schrieb:
Ever since automake 1.9, automake has been spewing garbage like
this when you try to build any module that uses gnome-doc-utils:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Natan Yellin wrote:
I gave a talk at the Boston Summit about problems with the developer
website. Even though most of the issues have been fixed, the slides are
still relevant to other parts of gnome.org.
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:52:55 +0100, Diego Escalante Urrelo
die...@gnome.org wrote:
On 2/10/09, Gil Forcada gforc...@gnome.org wrote:
Stormy is asking for ideas and topics for spend the advisory fundings,
so why not propose a hackfest-like meeting for documentation, by now
Not a bad idea
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:54:07 +0100, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 22:58 +0100 schrieb Tobias Mueller:
I'd say it'd be the best to remove that whole crash.gnome.org thing from
bugbuddy as there is obviously nobody who is able to manage that
platform. I assume
Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 00:01 +0100 schrieb Christian Kirbach:
If I remember correctly Fernando was working on integrating a system
called Google crashpad or a very similarly named system.
It was called Airbag and is now called breakpad, see
http://code.google.com/p/google-breakpad/ .
Le lundi 16 février 2009, à 23:41 +0100, Christian Kirbach a écrit :
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:52:55 +0100, Diego Escalante Urrelo
die...@gnome.org wrote:
On 2/10/09, Gil Forcada gforc...@gnome.org wrote:
Stormy is asking for ideas and topics for spend the advisory fundings,
so why not
10 matches
Mail list logo
