Re: freeze break request - WAS: Re: Help with strings for solution for desktop file virus problem

2009-02-24 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: 2009-02-23 klockan 10:43 skrev Christian Rose: On 2/23/09, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 15:24 +, Karl Lattimer wrote: Untrusted application launcher The file %s is an application

Re: [+gnome] Re: freeze break request - WAS: Re: Help with strings for solution for desktop file virus problem

2009-02-24 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2009-02-24 klockan 10:16 skrev Alexander Larsson: On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: 1. Why use the passive voice in the first sentence (... is unknown to you)? Directly addressing the user seems more logical in this case. 2. Why is marked as trusted? I think has

Re: [+gnome] Re: freeze break request - WAS: Re: Help with strings for solution for desktop file virus problem

2009-02-24 Thread Johannes Schmid
Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2009, 11:28 +0100 schrieb Wouter Bolsterlee: 2009-02-24 klockan 10:16 skrev Alexander Larsson: On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:52 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: 1. Why use the passive voice in the first sentence (... is unknown to you)? Directly addressing the user

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:41 +0100, Gian Mario Tagliaretti wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: Andre, * http://live.gnome.org/GtkPrintPort : gnome-games, gnome-python-desktop, gnome-devel-docs (update) * http://live.gnome.org/GioPort : PATCHES:

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 14:35 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a écrit : Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform? We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now. Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I believe.

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2009, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz: Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 14:35 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a écrit : Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform? http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop#upcoming_deprecations We've been

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Gian Mario Tagliaretti
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: Andre I think there are some misunderstanding, or if not, I'm the one misunderstanding :) Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform? http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop#upcoming_deprecations

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 20:31 +0100, Gian Mario Tagliaretti a écrit : On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote: We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now. Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I believe.

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Gian Mario Tagliaretti
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so unless GnomePrint is not going to be shipped anymore there is no point in talking about porting. That's the whole point: we don't want to ship libgnomeprint*

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Alberto Ruiz
2009/2/24 Gian Mario Tagliaretti gia...@gnome.org: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so unless GnomePrint is not going to be shipped anymore there is no point in talking about porting. That's

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2009-02-24 klockan 21:37 skrev Alberto Ruiz: 2009/2/24 Gian Mario Tagliaretti gia...@gnome.org: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so unless GnomePrint is not going to be shipped anymore there

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
[Note: cutting down To/Cc, I only left lists/teams) 2009-02-24 klockan 22:47 skrev Cosimo Cecchi: On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 22:27 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: - If a deprecated library is still shipped - then the language bindings for that deprecated library should also be shipped. -

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 23:03 +0100, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote: There is no way to find out who is actually using the Python (or whatever language) bindings for a given library. Some may have custom applications around, and just dropping support while the underlying library is not officially

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Steve Frécinaux
Alberto Ruiz wrote: 2009/2/24 Gian Mario Tagliaretti gia...@gnome.org: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so unless GnomePrint is not going to be shipped anymore there is no point in talking about

Re: GNOME 2.26 Showstopper Review

2009-02-24 Thread Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 23:12 +0100, Steve Frécinaux wrote: Alberto Ruiz wrote: 2009/2/24 Gian Mario Tagliaretti gia...@gnome.org: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Tomboy was using GnomePrint, the bindings provide the library, so unless GnomePrint is