On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 23:48 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
Quite a few files are missing from the Evolution repo on git.g.o. Among
them are: autogen.sh, AUTHORS, README, and a whole bunch of Makefile.am
files (but not all). Branches are also missing the same files.
Did something go amiss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Colin Walters schrieb:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Sandy Armstrong
* What is the applet story for gnome-shell? As the maintainer of a GNOME
applet (Tomboy), I accept that there may be significant work to port our
applet to a new
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I think it would be a big mistake to omit applets in the new gnome desktop
evolution.
why?
we've been changing the platform gradually over the years, mostly by
deprecating stuff and including new functionality. nevertheless, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emmanuele Bassi schrieb:
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I think it would be a big mistake to omit applets in the new gnome desktop
evolution.
why?
we've been changing the platform gradually over the years,
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I think it would be a big mistake to omit applets in the new gnome desktop
evolution.
why?
Because users want some functionality to be conveniently available
Il giorno dom, 19/04/2009 alle 14.31 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto:
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I think it would be a big mistake to omit applets in the new gnome desktop
evolution.
why?
we've been changing the platform gradually over the years,
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Cons:
- Have to modify autogen.sh to create an empty ChangeLog, or pass the
foreign flag to automake
We really ought to be passing foreign anyway. No one benefits from
having people be forced to create 0-length README files. (And if we want
to say but people should
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 17:26 +0200, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
Il giorno dom, 19/04/2009 alle 14.31 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto:
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I think it would be a big mistake to omit applets in the new gnome desktop
evolution.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jamie McCracken schrieb:
If a new infrastructure is needed then it would be best to merge it with
notification icons and make it xdg compliant and not gnome specific
I would love to see desktop a independent applet/widget/whatever spec.
I'm just
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Sebastian Pölsterl s...@k-d-w.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jamie McCracken schrieb:
If a new infrastructure is needed then it would be best to merge it with
notification icons and make it xdg compliant and not gnome specific
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 22:24 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
I just did my first commit with git (Yay!!). However I first made a
mistake and made a new remote branch called jaap in the cheese
project.
I now want to remove that branch because it was a mistake. How do I do this?
What I read from
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 22:44 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
Not really sure where to direct this, but I made an update to the
Tomboy website 3 hours ago:
http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gnomeweb-wml/commit/?id=3d1e649acdc765290de0f4a5abbec5ba0064d25f
I would expect the live site to have
Hi!
CC'ing GNOME shell list as this is probably the space this should be
discussed.
As the deskbar-applet maintainer I'm very concerned that are no clear
plans for an applet/desktop widget framework, yet. I guess porting an
applet to the new yet-to-be-invented framework would take
2009/4/19 Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de:
Hi!
CC'ing GNOME shell list as this is probably the space this should be
discussed.
As the deskbar-applet maintainer I'm very concerned that are no clear
plans for an applet/desktop widget framework, yet. I guess porting an
applet to the new
2009/4/19 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com:
2009/4/19 Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de:
Hi!
CC'ing GNOME shell list as this is probably the space this should be
discussed.
As the deskbar-applet maintainer I'm very concerned that are no clear
plans for an applet/desktop
On 04/19/2009 11:34 AM, Dan Winship wrote:
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Cons:
- Have to modify autogen.sh to create an empty ChangeLog, or pass the
foreign flag to automake
We really ought to be passing foreign anyway. No one benefits from
having people be forced to create 0-length README
no need to Cc me in: I'm subscribe to d-d-l.
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 16:02 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
what do applets provide, nowadays, and are they even remotely useful?
what can deskbar-applet provide that cannot be implemented with
something that does not sit inside a 24x24 icon
2009/4/19 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I think it would be a big mistake to omit applets in the new gnome desktop
evolution.
why?
cut
Emmanuele, do you[1] or do not have a plan for pluggable
applications (formerly know as
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 08:21 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I think it would be a big mistake to omit applets in the new gnome desktop
evolution.
why?
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 23:26 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
2009/4/19 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I think it would be a big mistake to omit applets in the new gnome desktop
evolution.
why?
cut
Emmanuele, do you[1]
Hi!
The reason applets are still alive is that people find
them useful. Could applets be replaced by something
much more sane? I'm sure. But throwing away applets
without offering an appealing alternative is not a
solution. It's curing a hangnail with amputation.
OK, but that means to
Just to give some ideas
* do applets need to be in the panel
No, and that's why Superkaramba - KDE, Google and Microsoft have come up
with on-screen widgets, which may be the solution ebassi is searching
for?
* do applets have to be constantly visible
Yes, that's the whole point of it,
Hello gentlemen, hamster applet[0] speaking!
Could not decide to which mail i should reply in the applet part[1] of
GNOME 3 thread, so i thought will give a shot to a new thread.
I have an initial proposal to revise applets and try to figure out
what is actually going on. After that, i believe
Luca Ferretti wrote:
I think that applets developers are legitimate to be worried about
their own efforts, the only reference in gnome-shell stuff is Design
an applet/add-on system in Open Design Question.
The original hackfest writeup
[ Resend from a typo in the To: ]
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 23:26 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
2009/4/19 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I think it would be a big mistake to omit applets in the new gnome desktop
evolution.
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 22:54 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
[ Resend from a typo in the To: ]
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 23:26 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
2009/4/19 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 14:34 +0200, Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
I think it would be a big mistake
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 13:19 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 22:44 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
Hi,
Not really sure where to direct this, but I made an update to the
Tomboy website 3 hours ago:
2009/4/17 Stefan Kost enso...@hora-obscura.de:
hi,
I am using librsvg to get pixbufs for my app. I could not find a dedicated
list,
for it, hope this one is okay.
First I am using deprecated api:
rsvg_pixbuf_from_file_at_size
as when using
rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf
I can specify the
28 matches
Mail list logo
