Hi,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was one of the happiest person on this planet the day we moved to
git and i can't thanks the people involved enough. Although overall i
am pretty happy with the migration, I do have one concern: The
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
I would suggest a few official branch names like 'master' and 'devel',
and a special two character prefix for personal branches like
'za-transcoding-rework' (Zeeshan Ali's personal branch), the rest
would be up to the project to decide.
A bit like what Zeeshan
ma., 04.05.2009 kl. 12.43 -0500, skrev Brian Cameron:
Kjartan:
gnome-games stopped building in jhbuild for me since we still have
clutter-0.8.8 there and the games want to use 0.9.x from what I can see
in the logs.
Time to move forward for everyone? Anyone else using clutter and thus
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:37 AM, John Carr john.c...@unrouted.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) zee...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I was one of the happiest person on this planet the day we moved to
git and i can't thanks the people involved enough. Although
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 20:58 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Could be also good have a minimal feedback from distro packagers. I
suppose that even though all relevant GNOME Desktop modules will be
switched to WebKitGtk, distros will continue to provide Firefox as
standard browser. So Fedora or
Pierre-Luc Beaudoin wrote:
In this email, I hope I made my case that libchamplain could be a nice
addition to the GNOME family.
Thanks for the detailed proposal, I updated the wiki page and added
libchamplain to the jhbuild moduleset.
Cheers,
Frederic
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 10:57 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
Might it be better to wait until clutter-gtk 0.9 is released before
jumping to the new version in jhbuild?
I could roll a 0.9.0 release of clutter-gtk right now, but it still
would be a moving target since we still have changes in
Le mardi 05 mai 2009 à 11:49 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
Thanks for the detailed proposal, I updated the wiki page and added
libchamplain to the jhbuild moduleset.
I feel obliged to mention that libchamplain is a dep of eog-plugins,
which has never been released yet and it not part of
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:37 AM, John Carr john.c...@unrouted.co.uk wrote:
So I think you should either allow moving branches such as
'za-transcoding-rework' or have personal repositories on
git.gnome.org.
I
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 01:51 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Marc-André Lureau
marcandre.lur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] what is the point of having 'project' in the
Le lundi 04 mai 2009, à 20:58 +0200, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
Could be also good have a minimal feedback from distro packagers. I
suppose that even though all relevant GNOME Desktop modules will be
switched to WebKitGtk, distros will continue to provide Firefox as
standard browser. So Fedora or
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 11:02 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
also, using clutter-0.9.2 is strongly discouraged; you should be using
git.
this is quite like using glib and gtk+ from the master branch during the
development cycle.
Hrm, then what's the point of the development tarballs? :-)
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 13:40 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 11:02 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
also, using clutter-0.9.2 is strongly discouraged; you should be using
git.
this is quite like using glib and gtk+ from the master branch during the
development cycle.
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Hrm, then what's the point of the development tarballs? :-)
providing snapshots, just like glib and gtk+ :-)
but the API might change during the development cycle, so you should be
aware of that. as far as I know, jhbuild does not build glib and gtk+
from tarballs
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Hrm, then what's the point of the development tarballs? :-)
providing snapshots, just like glib and gtk+ :-)
but the API might change during the development cycle, so you should be
aware of
Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2009, 10:02 -0500 schrieb Jason D. Clinton:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Clutter is an external dependency, while glib and gtk+ are part of the
platform. Policy (and experience) tells to build external dependencies
from
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
It's not only a formal distinction.
Such policies do not exist just because people are bored.
It's based on bad experiences in the past.
Why are we having this argument? Is release team going to veto Clutter for 2.28?
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:37 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Hrm, then what's the point of the development tarballs? :-)
providing snapshots, just like glib and gtk+ :-)
but the API might change during the development cycle, so you should be
aware of that. as far as I know, jhbuild
Am Dienstag, den 05.05.2009, 11:21 -0500 schrieb Jason D. Clinton:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
It's not only a formal distinction.
Such policies do not exist just because people are bored.
It's based on bad experiences in the past.
Why are we
Kjartan:
Might it be better to wait until clutter-gtk 0.9 is released before
jumping to the new version in jhbuild?
Won't clutter-0.9.x work with clutter-gtk-0.8.x?
What do you mean by work? You need clutter 0.8 to build clutter-gtk
0.8.
They are parallel installable, so if you want
Emmanuele:
I'll make a clutter-gtk 0.9.0 release tarball tomorrow, then.
Will it include gobject-introspection support?
http://bugzilla.o-hand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490
Would be nice to support gnome-shell with this, I think.
Brian
___
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 13:32 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Emmanuele:
I'll make a clutter-gtk 0.9.0 release tarball tomorrow, then.
Will it include gobject-introspection support?
http://bugzilla.o-hand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490
Would be nice to support gnome-shell with this, I think.
Hey folks,
I'm taking a hard look at the Platform Overview and how we
can improve our message to ISDs through better documentation.
Our release sets, unfortunately, don't really reflect what we
really recommend to developers. That role has more or less
been delegated to the Platform Overview.
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:05 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm taking a hard look at the Platform Overview
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/index.html
For those who don't know.
--
Shaun
___
desktop-devel-list
Il giorno mar, 05/05/2009 alle 14.05 -0500, Shaun McCance ha scritto:
Hey folks,
[...]
The list is what came to mind as I was writing this email.
Please feel free to discuss libraries I forgot.
Thanks Shaun, you're wonderful as always. I also think it would be nice
to mention
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:25 +0200, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
Il giorno mar, 05/05/2009 alle 14.05 -0500, Shaun McCance ha scritto:
Hey folks,
[...]
The list is what came to mind as I was writing this email.
Please feel free to discuss libraries I forgot.
Thanks Shaun, you're
Shaun:
Shouldn't GStreamer be included for media support? If not
in the Platform, then at least Recommended?
Also, what about gvfs, libdaemon, and libunique?
Brian
On 05/05/09 14:05, Shaun McCance wrote:
Hey folks,
I'm taking a hard look at the Platform Overview and how we
can improve
Il giorno mar, 05/05/2009 alle 14.41 -0500, Brian Cameron ha scritto:
Shaun:
Shouldn't GStreamer be included for media support?
It's in the list (second item of the Recommended section) :-)
Also, what about gvfs, libdaemon, and libunique?
gvfs could be introduced along with GIO; as for
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 01:51 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Marc-André Lureau
marcandre.lur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Felipe Contreras
Hi Shaun
Il giorno mar, 05/05/2009 alle 14.05 -0500, Shaun McCance ha scritto:
Recommended
===
Cairo -- Incredible drawing library, used by GTK+. There
seems to be general agreement that developers should use
Cairo when they need to do custom drawing.
I do not think that
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:53:55PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 01:51 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Marc-André Lureau
marcandre.lur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
'1-2' and 'gnome-2-26'.
Quick note. If we're going to have short branch names (as I'm planning to use
for pango), it should be 1.2, not 1-2.
behdad
___
desktop-devel-list mailing
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 10:53:55PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 01:51 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod
behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote:
case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
'1-2' and 'gnome-2-26'.
Quick note. If we're going to have short branch names (as I'm planning to
use for pango), it should be 1.2, not 1-2.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
Hey folks,
[...]
I would like to get people's opinions on what technologies
we should be pushing. I'm interested both in the here and
now and in what people think the Gnome 3 message should be.
Hi,
Great time to
On 05/05/2009 04:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod
behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote:
case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
'1-2' and 'gnome-2-26'.
Quick note. If we're going to have short branch names (as I'm planning
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:59 +0200, Paolo Borelli wrote:
Hi Shaun
Il giorno mar, 05/05/2009 alle 14.05 -0500, Shaun McCance ha scritto:
Recommended
===
Cairo -- Incredible drawing library, used by GTK+. There
seems to be general agreement that developers should use
Cairo
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:41 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Shaun:
Shouldn't GStreamer be included for media support? If not
in the Platform, then at least Recommended?
It's in there.
Also, what about gvfs, libdaemon, and libunique?
GVFS doesn't provide API. On the other hand, it
does make
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:10:42PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
IMO you should make a good argument to switch, not the other way around.
What I'm proposing makes things simpler. Do I need to make a good
argument of why simple things are good?
You gave as reason 'you just switched your SCM
On 05/05/2009 04:20 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
So do we treat Cairo as an implementation detail, or
is it something we talk up? My thoughts are that if
you're doing anything non-trivial, you're probably
going to need to do some custom drawing outside of
what GTK+ provides. Cairo is extremely
On tis, 2009-05-05 at 23:10 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Imagine someone who has been on a GNOME hiatus or is a new comer. What
would be easier to understand? '1-2' or 'stable'?
If I want the sources for the gedit in Gnome 2.26, cloning gedit's
repository and checking out the branch
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 23:10 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
To be clear on what I'm proposing: there's no need to add 'project' to
branch names when you already know the project ('1-2' is fine). But
going into the next level, there's no need to have '1-2', '1-4' and
'1-0', 'stable' and 'master'
On Tue, 05.05.09 16:33, Matthias Clasen (matthias.cla...@gmail.com) wrote:
What's libdaemon?
libdaemon is an implementation detail of pulseaudio as far as I am concerned.
Just for correctness' sake: it's an implementation detail of Avahi,
not of PulseAudio.
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering
Hi,
I am trying to put some git wishes pros/cons in
http://live.gnome.org/Git/Wishes. I surely missed things, but I tried
to be neutral.
regards,
--
Marc-André Lureau
Sent from Helsinki, Southern Finland, Finland
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 05/05/2009 04:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod
behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote:
case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
'1-2' and
Hi
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
libdaemon is an implementation detail of pulseaudio as far as I am concerned.
PulseAudio does not use libdaemon, afaik. Avahi, maybe?
regards,
--
Marc-André Lureau
Sent from Helsinki, Southern Finland,
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
Also, what about gvfs, libdaemon, and libunique?
GVFS doesn't provide API. On the other hand, it
does make GIO much more awesome. It's currently
discussed in the section on GIO, and I don't have
any plans to change
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:10:42PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
IMO you should make a good argument to switch, not the other way around.
What I'm proposing makes things simpler. Do I need to make a good
argument of why
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:52:54PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:10:42PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
IMO you should make a good argument to switch, not the other way around.
What I'm
Heya!
Trailing whitespace sucks. git is only half as much fun when people
have trailing whitespace in their code. diffs get cluttered up by
changes that actually aren't changes.
Many other project these days enforce pretty rigid whitespace regimes
and I wonder if that would be something to
On 05/05/2009 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Anyway, Owen said he didn't want to fight this fight. I guess I can
understand that, and I don't really want to fight this fight
either. Nonetheless I think this would be good to have and the least I
can do is mentioning this on desktop-devel
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:52:54PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:10:42PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
IMO you should
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 23:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 05/05/2009 04:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod
behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote:
case that's not a
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:33:59AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 11:52:54PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Tue, May 05,
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 00:33 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
[...]
That's just how git works: branches and tags are mere pointers.
There's no difference in the object storage, the only difference is
logical, you use branches
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Robin Sonefors ozam...@flukkost.nu wrote:
On tis, 2009-05-05 at 23:10 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Imagine someone who has been on a GNOME hiatus or is a new comer. What
would be easier to understand? '1-2' or 'stable'?
If I want the sources for the gedit
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Germán Póo-Caamaño g...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 00:33 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
[...]
That's just how git works: branches and tags are mere pointers.
There's no
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 05/05/2009 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Anyway, Owen said he didn't want to fight this fight. I guess I can
understand that, and I don't really want to fight this fight
either. Nonetheless I think this would
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 00:48 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Robin Sonefors ozam...@flukkost.nu wrote:
On tis, 2009-05-05 at 23:10 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Imagine someone who has been on a GNOME hiatus or is a new comer. What
would be easier
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 23:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 05/05/2009 04:12 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:00 PM,
On 05/05/2009 05:59 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Behdad Esfahbodbeh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 05/05/2009 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Anyway, Owen said he didn't want to fight this fight. I guess I can
understand that, and I don't really want to
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
I personally always do a git diff before commit, and look for
red-background blocks that represent trailing whitespace and fix them
myself.
Have your gnome terminal/bash preferences been tweaked? I did a test
with git
Le mardi 05 mai 2009, à 23:00 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
Heya!
Trailing whitespace sucks. git is only half as much fun when people
have trailing whitespace in their code. diffs get cluttered up by
changes that actually aren't changes.
Many other project these days enforce pretty
Le lundi 04 mai 2009 à 16:22 +0100, Alp Toker a écrit :
And finally, are there any unported projects remaining? I helped port
a few applications and the patches have been integrated, and you've
kept things active on the Epiphany side. GIMP, DevHelp, Yelp,
Epiphany, Epiphany Extensions, Blam,
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 01:01 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
You don't need a branch to make commits, tag them and push them.
$ git checkout PANGO_1_2_4
# make changes
$ git commit -a
$ git tag PANGO_1_2_5
$ git push origin PANGO_1_2_5
But if you feel icky about not working on a
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 22:37 -0400, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose libchamplain as an external dependency to GNOME
2.28. If you never heard about this project, it is a Clutter based map
widget for your application. It currently uses downloaded image tiles
as map
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:33:59AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Imagine someone who has been on a GNOME hiatus or is a new comer. What
would be easier to understand? '1-2' or 'stable'?
'stable' was already
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:36 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
Good catch on libcanberra. It's clearly good for us
to have a convenient API for this. Do we really want
to push another micro-library for that? Should GTK+
just learn to do it?
yeah, in fact, libcanberra provides a libcanberra-gtk
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 05/05/2009 05:59 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Behdad Esfahbodbeh...@behdad.org
wrote:
On 05/05/2009 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Anyway, Owen said he didn't want to
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 00:48 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Robin Sonefors ozam...@flukkost.nu wrote:
On tis, 2009-05-05 at 23:10 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Imagine someone who
On 05/05/2009 06:05 PM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Behdad Esfahbodbeh...@behdad.org wrote:
I personally always do a git diff before commit, and look for
red-background blocks that represent trailing whitespace and fix them
myself.
Have your gnome terminal/bash
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 10:12 +1200, John Stowers wrote:
As the maintainer of osm-gps-map [1], a non-clutter mapping library
with comparable features, I support libchamplain's proposal.
Thanks for your support.
I do not intend to add clutter support to osm-gps-map, it will remain
a Gdk/Cairo
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
You don't need a branch to make commits, tag them and push them.
The current workflow is well understood, works well for translators
and other contributors, and is supported by all our tools
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 01:24 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
No. It points to the latest code in the 2.24 branch. There might be code
after the release. It's a branch, it's not a tag. So, maybe I don't
understand what
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 01:28 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 01:01 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
You don't need a branch to
On Tue, 05.05.09 17:06, Behdad Esfahbod (beh...@behdad.org) wrote:
On 05/05/2009 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Anyway, Owen said he didn't want to fight this fight. I guess I can
understand that, and I don't really want to fight this fight
either. Nonetheless I think this would be
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 01:24 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
No. It points to the latest code in the 2.24 branch. There might be code
after the
I've just created a gnome-2-26 branch for GConf.
I had to remove a single translation from ne.po before being able to
do so, since msgfmt -c was complaining about it.
The reason for branching is that I want to fix
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558619 which will allow the
defaults
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand 'gnome-2-0' is not pointing to any release, there
where commits after the last release. So my question here is: who
would care about those commits? They were done 6 years ago and nobody
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:13:07AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Olav Vitters o...@bkor.dhs.org wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:33:59AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Imagine someone who has been on a GNOME hiatus or is a new comer.
What
80 matches
Mail list logo
