Hi,
I would like to propose libgdata as a new desktop module for GNOME 2.28.
libgdata is a GLib-based library for accessing online service APIs using
the GData protocol — most notably, Google's services. It provides APIs
to access the common Google services (at this stage, only Google
Calendar, Yo
Hi,
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Elijah Newren wrote:
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
>> wrote:
>>> On the other hand 'gnome-2-0' is not pointing to any release, there
>>> where commits after the last release. So m
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 16:00 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> >> case that's not a compelling argument; you can still have branches
> >> '1-2' and 'gnome-2-26'.
>
> Quick note. If we're going to have short branch names (as I'm planning to
> use
> for pango), it should be "1.2", not "1-2".
Why? S
I have to admit, there is probably some advantage to moving these very
old branches into an archive (either refs/archive/foo or a complete
archive clone) after some amount of time. Mostly because I thought "new
IM? What new IM?".
Also permit the deletion of branches that have been merged with mast
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Christian Persch wrote:
> Hi;
>
> John Stowers wrote:
> > Unfortunately, the original TangoGPS author, [...], ignores any
> > emails from me, other osm-gps-map developers, or users, that request
> > permission to change the license of osm-gps-map to LGPL.
> >
> >
Hi;
John Stowers wrote:
> Unfortunately, the original TangoGPS author, [...], ignores any
> emails from me, other osm-gps-map developers, or users, that request
> permission to change the license of osm-gps-map to LGPL.
>
> I guess the lesson here is to never create a library, derived from a
> GP
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Les Harris wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> Would you fight to keep alive the branch Linus just found too crappy
>> and just killed it? If a commit never made it to a release and
>> probably never would, is it really that impor
Hi! Welcome to the end of the thread. It certainly has
been fun, but in order to conserve our precious electrons
in these hard economic times, we must regretfully now
close this thread.
As the kids say, you don't have to go home, but you can't
post here.
Thank you and good night.
Hi
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Les Harris wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>
> The consensus so far seems to be that losing commits is a non-starter.
> It's not clear to me what benefit dropping these ossified branches
> gives us. What is the problem you'
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> Would you fight to keep alive the branch Linus just found too crappy
> and just killed it? If a commit never made it to a release and
> probably never would, is it really that important?
It seems to me whatever Linus decided to do for the
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> On the other hand 'gnome-2-0' is not pointing to any release, there
>> where commits after the last release. So my question here is: who
>> would care about those commits? T
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Germán Póo-Caamaño wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:26 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:27 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>> >> Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:15 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> Are you going to argue that this branch is desirable to keep alive for
>> all eternity?
>> http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gedit/log/?h=CORBA_ENABLED
>
> I think most reasonable people wil
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:15 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Are you going to argue that this branch is desirable to keep alive for
> all eternity?
> http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gedit/log/?h=CORBA_ENABLED
I think most reasonable people will say that there is a difference
between branches which were
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:26 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:27 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> >> Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
> >> > Debian patches are debian patches, they control
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:27 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>> Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
>> > Debian patches are debian patches, they control them, and they make
>> > debian releases. If GNOME decides to remov
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
>> Debian patches are debian patches, they control them, and they make
>> debian releases. If GNOME decides to remove those commits the
>> distributions will not loose their pat
> >
> > * It is good to see you have added support for specifying map uri's. I
> > would also like to see you support quadtree encoding, and
> > randomization of hosts. See osm-gps-map for what I mean...
>
> I will have a look, but little code can be shared as osm-gps-map is
> GPL :) but if the
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Joanmarie Diggs
wrote:
> Right now, my answer is "gosh, I sure hope so." :-) Admittedly, not as
> good as a "heck yes!", but better than "no."
>
> Where things stand as of today is that WebKit needs quite a bit of work
> to ready as far as a11y is concerned. HOWEVER
Hey Will, all.
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 09:58 -0400, Willie Walker wrote:
> Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Willie: do you have any idea when the a11y team would be able to give a
> > +1 for webkit? Being able to know it's okay as soon as possible would
> > definitely help us organize things.
>
> I'm CC'ing
Behdad Esfahbod schrieb:
> On 05/05/2009 05:59 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Behdad Esfahbod
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/05/2009 05:00 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>>
Anyway, Owen said he didn't want to fight this fight. I guess I can
understand that, and
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 10:40 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 11:18 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Wed, May 06, 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > I just have these lines in my ~/.emacs:
> > > (autoload 'nuke-trailing-whitespace "nuke-trailing-whitespace" nil t)
> > > (add-h
Vincent Untz wrote:
Willie: do you have any idea when the a11y team would be able to give a
+1 for webkit? Being able to know it's okay as soon as possible would
definitely help us organize things.
I'm CC'ing Joanie, who'll be the person doing most of the work on the
assistive technology side
Hi,
Le lundi 04 mai 2009, à 14:50 +0300, Xan Lopez a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> the aim of the Epiphany team is to make 2.28 our first WebKit release.
> For this to happen we need to replace our external dependency on Gecko
> with WebKitGTK+, so consider this a request to do so.
>
> In the post 2.26 m
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> On the other hand 'gnome-2-0' is not pointing to any release, there
>> where commits after the last release. So my question here is: who
>> would care about those commits?
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 12:27 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
> > Debian patches are debian patches, they control them, and they make
> > debian releases. If GNOME decides to remove those commits the
> > distributions will not loose thei
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 02:21 +0300, Felipe Contreras a écrit :
> Debian patches are debian patches, they control them, and they make
> debian releases. If GNOME decides to remove those commits the
> distributions will not loose their patches.
I think this summarize well the whole thing: we do
Hi,
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:13:07AM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 12:33:59AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >> >> >> Imagine someone who has been
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 11:18 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > I just have these lines in my ~/.emacs:
> > (autoload 'nuke-trailing-whitespace "nuke-trailing-whitespace" nil t)
> > (add-hook 'write-file-hooks 'nuke-trailing-whitespace)
>
> This sounds
On Wed, May 06, 2009, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I just have these lines in my ~/.emacs:
> (autoload 'nuke-trailing-whitespace "nuke-trailing-whitespace" nil t)
> (add-hook 'write-file-hooks 'nuke-trailing-whitespace)
This sounds like it would remove all trailing whitespace in any file
you touc
30 matches
Mail list logo
