2009/11/4 Paul Cutler pcut...@gnome.org:
Semi-related question:
Zeitgeist is currently hosted on Launchpad. Are there plans to use GNOME's
infrastructure?
Everyone: Please don't let this turn into a VCS flamefest
Note that this is my own view of things and not the official opinion
of the
Are you looking into some situation integration, like integrating information
from Hamster. A course example of that would be that you use different
application, documents in work that at home. A more fine grate example
would be if you are working on art, surfing, finance you would get
programs
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Christian Neumair cneum...@gnome.org wrote:
Reading some of the responses, major concerns wrt accessibility,
theming and some other topics regarding quality control have been
raised. I'd like to add another one: All the current desktop
components (including the
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Christian Neumair cneum...@gnome.org wrote:
I have not been following the GNOME shell discussions, but I wonder
why we JavaScript is needed at all. Now that some of the core modules
exhibit Python, suddently JavaScript is discussed. I have always
considered
2009/11/4 Olafur Arason ola...@gmail.com:
Are you looking into some situation integration, like integrating information
from Hamster. A course example of that would be that you use different
application, documents in work that at home.
To my knowledge we have not tried to integrate directly
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 02:23 +0100, Christian Neumair wrote:
2009/11/2 Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com:
GJS and SpiderMonkey: Currently gnome-shell is build using the
GJS bindings to Javascript which work with the Mozilla SpiderMonkey
Javascript engine. The comparison to
JS, whilst a good glue language, is nevertheless problematic in this it
appears impotent (no native dbus support nor subclassing). I would only
recommend it for scripting that does not need dbus. Currently a lot of
code needs to be written in C to make up for these shortfalls in
Gnome-Shell so I
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Jamie McCracken
jamie.mccr...@googlemail.com wrote:
JS, whilst a good glue language, is nevertheless problematic in this it
appears impotent (no native dbus support nor subclassing). I would only
recommend it for scripting that does not need dbus. Currently a
I also forgot to mention the issue with applets, which was raised in a
private e-mail to me. As I understand it, the existing applets will all
need to be rewritten for GNOME Shell. If this is the case, then we have
some issues where some accessibility applets (e.g., the MouseTweaks
dwell click
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 02:24 +0100, Christian Neumair wrote:
2009/11/2 Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com:
This should be read as a semi-proposal: at this point I don't think
gnome-shell is going to be ready to be shipped as a final component on
the 2.30 schedule. But getting it into people's
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
My initial understanding of the Zeitgeist engine was that it was
a data collection engine to collect a rich view of how the user
used their computer over time, which would then be used to build
an OLPC
FYI...regarding Memphis a11y...
Will
---BeginMessage---
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 10:20 -0500, Willie Walker wrote:
External dependencies: gmime, vala, Memphis (for libchamplain), libdb
(already approved).
Memphis is quite unaccessible. It generates an opaque image from
OpenStreetMap data.
Hi All:
Here's some really simple questions that all new module proposers should
be able to answer for accessibility (note that this applies to things
that expose a GUI). It's not an exhaustive analysis by any means, but
it will capture some of the most blatant failures. It's so simple,
Richard Hughes wrote:
Anyway, if anyone has any great argument about why I shouldn't propose
gnome-packagekit for 2-29 (or why I should do it for 2-27) please
shout now. I'm also not sure whether to propose it for the desktop set
or something else. Ideas welcome.
I was going to ask about the
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 15:12 -0400 schrieb Jamie McCracken:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
5) Allow for possibility of uniform services for things like
contacts
instead of them being redefined for all clients (evolution, pidgin, web
services) - this
15 matches
Mail list logo
