Hi Owen,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Purpose:
GNOME Shell takes advantage of the capabilities of modern graphics hardware
...
Does gnome-shell work without graphics capabilities? A few days back I
tried it from ubuntu karmic repository (so the
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 11:19 +0300, Naba Kumar wrote:
Hi Owen,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Purpose:
GNOME Shell takes advantage of the capabilities of modern graphics
hardware ...
Does gnome-shell work without graphics capabilities? A few
From: Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com
At a technical level, once he finishes up his current immediate work on
the message tray Dan Winship is going to dedicate a chunk of time
(probably around a month or so) to pushing things forward. What exactly
he works is going to depend on further
Hi Owen,
Thanks for explanation. I am sure even if there are cases where 3d
acceleration is not available, one could still use metacity as
alternative.
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
* There is zero reason that virtual machines can't also have 3D
Hi Naba!
Does gnome-shell work without graphics capabilities?
No, you need a hardware accelerated graphic card.
So, basically my question is do you have official plan to support
non-accelerated machines, or is it just a bug? I guess there are still
legitimate use of non-accelerated
maintained for people without the correct hardware support. As of now,
all intel, amd/ati and nvidia cards sold in the last five years should
I don't believe that is correct for any of the listed vendors even on
Linux. On BSD the situation is even more patchy.
Is Gnome dropping support for
