Re: FooCanvas for 3.0?

2010-05-06 Thread Edward Hervey
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 12:09 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > Many applications now use GooCanvas which is cairo based and still maintained. PiTiVi is one of those applications, and yes GooCanvas is still maintained :) Edward > > Vivien > ___ > d

Do we have a GNOME OID?

2010-05-06 Thread Stef Walter
Does anyone know if we have a GNOME OID, whether allocated through IANA directly or through another private.enterprise? An OID is used in certain software as a unique identifier, particularly in a good deal security related protocols. We have a need for some new OIDs in gnome-keyring, so I was wo

AW: Module Proposal: GNOME Activity Journal

2010-05-06 Thread Thorsten Prante
Some further comments below. > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Randy B [mailto:email.t...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Freitag, 7. Mai 2010 02:33 > An: Colin Walters > Cc: Thorsten Prante; desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > Betreff: Re: Module Proposal: GNOME Activity Journal > > This is just a qu

Re: Module Proposal: GNOME Activity Journal

2010-05-06 Thread Randy B
This is just a quick note. People often confuse Zeitgeist with the Activity Journal. The Journal is a centralized activity browser that uses Zeitgeist. Other implementations around the GNOME desktop will use Zeitgeist directly unless they just want to just display a specific day in the journal or i

Re: Module Proposal: GNOME Activity Journal

2010-05-06 Thread Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals
2010/5/6 Colin Walters : > * How does this affect resource consumption on the desktop - if I > don't ever launch Activity Journal, is Zeitgeist running? That depends on whether there is something else using it. Zeitgeist won't start until something starts it via D-Bus activation, be it a data-sour

Re: Module Proposal for 3.0: Déjà Dup Backup Tool

2010-05-06 Thread Sandy Armstrong
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Michael Terry wrote: > 2) I'm still curious to get feedback on other maintainers' experience > with pulling in other regular developers once they became a GNOME > module.  Frankly, I'm leery of the extra burden it would put on me in > terms of bug reports and expec

Re: Module Proposal: GNOME Activity Journal

2010-05-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 19:22 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 13:10 -0400 schrieb Randy B: > > We want to add Zeitgeist features to all over GNOME > > Can I ask you to please answer Colin's questions separately with > *concrete* plans (and maybe a separate section for "n

Re: Module Proposal for 3.0: Déjà Dup Backup Tool

2010-05-06 Thread Luca Ferretti
Il giorno gio, 06/05/2010 alle 13.24 -0400, Michael Terry ha scritto: > Hi, it's the maintainer of Deja Dup again. A couple things: > > 1) I've been talking to the usability guys a bit about the UI in > general and thoughts on a possible Profiles interface. There's an > ongoing discussion on the

Re: Module Proposal for 3.0: Déjà Dup Backup Tool

2010-05-06 Thread Michael Terry
Hi, it's the maintainer of Deja Dup again. A couple things: 1) I've been talking to the usability guys a bit about the UI in general and thoughts on a possible Profiles interface. There's an ongoing discussion on the mailing list (though I think I haven't been terribly responsive in the thread)

Re: Module Proposal: GNOME Activity Journal

2010-05-06 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 13:10 -0400 schrieb Randy B: > We want to add Zeitgeist features to all over GNOME Can I ask you to please answer Colin's questions separately with *concrete* plans (and maybe a separate section for "nice to have")? Thanks a lot, andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | fa

Re: Module Proposal: GNOME Activity Journal

2010-05-06 Thread Randy B
We want to add Zeitgeist features to all over GNOME, especially now that libzeitgeist has appeared, however that has little to do with the Journal which is a centralized activity browser. That is to say adding a Most Used feature in Nautilus or a Recently Opened With feature in shell would use zeit

Re: Module Proposal for 3.0: Déjà Dup Backup Tool

2010-05-06 Thread Paul Cutler
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 17:10 -0500, Michael Terry wrote: > I'm not sure if this is too early, but it's been 6 months since > modules proposals opened for 2.30, so I'm guessing it's an appropriate > time for 3.0 modules? > > I think GNOME could use a backup program. There are some out there > alrea

Re: Re: External Dependency Proposal: libappindicator

2010-05-06 Thread Dan Winship
belatedly... On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:42:02, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:42:58PM -0600, Ted Gould wrote: >> Q: Does this fit the the design goals for GNOME Shell? >> A: I can't speak for the designers of GNOME Shell but they've talked >>about how the top panel should behave

Re: Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > I'm afraid I still haven't worked on the integration of Rygel into > gnome-user-share because I still don't know how we want to handle > libraries of videos in the GNOME desktop itself (and I don't mean in a > technical sense, but in a UI sen

Re: Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > Right, but if it allows users to do cool things, we'd like to > talk about those in the Desktop Help or elsewhere. As soon as I proposed Rygel, someone pointed out that he doesn't know what Rygel is so I added a user-story at the top of t

Re: Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 09:32 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 17:15 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > > These I'm not entirely clear on what they'll affect: > > > > > > * rygel > > > > Me neiher. :) I

Re: Module Proposal: GNOME Activity Journal

2010-05-06 Thread Colin Walters
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Thorsten Prante wrote: > Purpose: > > GNOME Activity Journal is not a File Browser but an Activity Browser. > > It uses the Zeitgeist Framework to display what you did and introduces a > better way of quickly finding the things that you were doing. What is your lon

Re: Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 17:15 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > > These I'm not entirely clear on what they'll affect: > > > > * rygel > > Me neiher. :) If I understood correctly, you are talking about the > docs user sees when

Re: Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 15:07 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 6 May 2010 15:02, Shaun McCance wrote: > > * gnome-color-manager > > I figured this would just have it's own help file. We've already got > quite a bit of content: > http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-color-manager/plain/help/C/gnome-c

Last call for comments on module proposals

2010-05-06 Thread Andre Klapper
The GNOME release-team will soon decide about module inclusions for GNOME 3.0 based on the community input from this mailing list. If you have not commented yet, if there is anything to add, if you have questions: Please comment now on the corresponding thread for the module (for a specific modul

Re: Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hi, On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Shaun McCance wrote: > These I'm not entirely clear on what they'll affect: > >  * rygel Me neiher. :) If I understood correctly, you are talking about the docs user sees when she hits the 'Help' button. Since Rygel is supposed to be mostly invisible to an e

Re: Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Richard Hughes
On 6 May 2010 15:02, Shaun McCance wrote: >  * gnome-color-manager I figured this would just have it's own help file. We've already got quite a bit of content: http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-color-manager/plain/help/C/gnome-color-manager.xml Help from the docs team would be very welcome. Ric

Documentation for Proposed Modules

2010-05-06 Thread Shaun McCance
http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing Just a friendly reminder: "Maintainers of proposed modules are, however, expected to contact the GNOME Documentation Team between the proposals and the decisions (earlier is better). Please do this even if your module already has do

Re: FooCanvas for 3.0?

2010-05-06 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Donnerstag, den 06.05.2010, 11:46 +0200 schrieb Johannes Schmid: > There was kind of a discussion not to include any full-featured Canvas > in the future in the GNOME platform. For the records: For an overview of canvases see http://live.gnome.org/ProjectRidley/CanvasOverview andre -- mailt

Re: FooCanvas for 3.0?

2010-05-06 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 12:13 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: > Hi! > > > Many applications now use GooCanvas which is cairo based and still > > maintained. > > Yes, I know. Some use others. Anyway, none of them is part of GNOME and > it doesn't look like any would become that any time soon. I thin

Re: FooCanvas for 3.0?

2010-05-06 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! > Many applications now use GooCanvas which is cairo based and still maintained. Yes, I know. Some use others. Anyway, none of them is part of GNOME and it doesn't look like any would become that any time soon. Johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

Re: FooCanvas for 3.0?

2010-05-06 Thread Vivien Malerba
On 6 May 2010 11:46, Johannes Schmid wrote: > Hi! > > As many of you probably know, GnomeCanvas is the only component that has > no replacement for 3.0 while being deprecated for some time. There was > kind of a discussion not to include any full-featured Canvas in the > future in the GNOME platfo

Re: FooCanvas for 3.0?

2010-05-06 Thread Jean Bréfort
Hi, Gnumeric does not use FooCanvas anymore. Regards, Jean Le jeudi 06 mai 2010 à 11:46 +0200, Johannes Schmid a écrit : > Hi! > > As many of you probably know, GnomeCanvas is the only component that has > no replacement for 3.0 while being deprecated for some time. There was > kind of a discus

FooCanvas for 3.0?

2010-05-06 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! As many of you probably know, GnomeCanvas is the only component that has no replacement for 3.0 while being deprecated for some time. There was kind of a discussion not to include any full-featured Canvas in the future in the GNOME platform. However, in the current state nautilus and gnumeri