On Mi, 2010-08-04 at 10:20 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno gio, 29/07/2010 alle 17.31 +0200, daniel g. siegel ha scritto:
you can find the effect files in the gnome-video-effects git
repository on the usual place [1].
Daniel, do you have the time to provide a page on live.gnome.org
Am Dienstag, den 03.08.2010, 01:28 +0200 schrieb Javier Jardón:
[1]
http://blog.tomeuvizoso.net/2010/06/proposed-gnome-goal-port-your-pygtk-to.html
With the merge of PyGI into PyGObject, this GnomeGoal has been moved to [1].
Also, you have updated info about the porting here: [2]
[1]
[ Resurrecting this thread as I just got back from travelling ]
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:12 PM, John Stowers
john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Something like If you wrote a python plugin for GEdit/Rhythmbox/Totem
then you need to rewrite/fix it to use pygobject gobject-introspection
if you
Was talking about this with Matthias on IRC, and he suggested that it
would be good to make the point to a larger audience.
* libpeas seems to have support for loading plugins written in both
Python and Javascript in the same process.
* Both seed and pygobject use GObject toggle references.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
So, do we really want to promote this as the way we do plugins in GNOME?
Language neutrality for plugins seems nice, but is a bit of a trap.
This is precisely the reason why we removed Python support when we
added the
