On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 10:30:46 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
This whole debate is way too heated and I'd like to take this out ofthe
arena. Are there 2 or 3 people on the GNOME side that areavailable to talk
this through and
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:07, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps the involved people from KDE and Gnome should just sit down in
an IRC chat room and talk about it.
That is pretty much exactly what I'm trying to organize. But I need to
know who that would be from the GNOME-side.
note:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 10:30:46 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
This whole debate is way too heated and I'd like to take this out ofthe
arena. Are there 2 or 3 people on the GNOME side that areavailable to talk
this through and find a solution? Ideally whoevermaintains system settings
on the GNOME
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:11:32AM +0200, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:07, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps the involved people from KDE and Gnome should just sit down in
an IRC chat room and talk about it.
That is pretty much exactly what I'm trying to organize.
On 28 July 2011 08:51, Thomas Lübking thomas.luebk...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought that was what the GenericName entry was supposed to be good
for, so gnome-terminal.desktop would have
Name=GNOME Terminal
GenericName=Terminal
Exec=gnome-terminal
and the runner/menu could use the GenericName
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:24, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:11:32AM +0200, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 10:07, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps the involved people from KDE and Gnome should just sit down in
an IRC chat room and talk
Am Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:15:46 +0200
schrieb Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl:
However, that is not our goal. We want something simple. For
everything part of GNOME Core we have say what it does instead of
putting the git module name in the menu.
I thought that was what the GenericName entry was
Anybody jhbuilding GNOME will have run into problems with .po file
conflicts in gdk-pixbuf, where building it causes local changes that
conflict with updates from translators. Finally got annoyed enough to
track down the problem.
The unique characteristics that gdk-pixbuf has that causes these
2011/7/28 Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com:
Anybody jhbuilding GNOME will have run into problems with .po file
conflicts in gdk-pixbuf, where building it causes local changes that
I'm sure it occurs to gstreamer stuff too, and maybe gtk+
B) is probably cleanest; I don't know if it will cause
Hey,
we are using inttool in gedit and we don't have problem with osx or win32.
Regards.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
Anybody jhbuilding GNOME will have run into problems with .po file
conflicts in gdk-pixbuf, where building it causes local changes
Hi GNOME developers,
So for a long time, jhbuild has always looked in your system for
pkg-config dependencies. However, if the moduleset said to build
something, we'd still build it.
Concretely for example, if the moduleset said to build dbus, we'd
build it, even if your system had a new enough
In the latest jhbuild, when the partial_build key is set (the
default) we explicitly look at what's installed on the system, and if
they're new enough, omit them from the build list (unless you have
built them before).
This doesn't currently work on non-packagekit system, such as Ubuntu. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
