On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:46 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
I guess you want to kill bug-buddy for regular users only, as you was
talking about bugzilla connection, because ABRT is unusable for
developers, as it silently ignores crashes in applications which are not
packaged, furthermore, if
On 31/08/11 22:26, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:24 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
Hey Federico,
I noticed that we have Contacts, Documents, and Sushi in the
apps moduleset.
gnome-documents worries me because of its dependency on Tracker.
As far as I can tell, g-d
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:26 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
(FindingAndReminding is even marked obsolete!
For clarification: This just refers to its status for 3.2, it does not
necessarily refer to future GNOME releases.
andre
--
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
Hi again!
Anyway we're late, and I'll ask you for two more days of patience, so
that we have the time to meet and give you a proper answer on the
practical questions you have; and we will make sure this gets improved
in the future.
So we had our release team meeting yesterday evening,
Shaun
Am 01.09.2011 11:34, schrieb Frederic Peters:
Hello all,
This is 3.1.90, and it's out! It's the first beta of what will be
GNOME 3.2, enjoy it while it's time, the next beta (3.1.91) will
arrive next week.
I saw this in the release notes of gnome-control-center:
Power:
- Remove power and
Hey Denis!
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Denis Washington den...@online.de wrote:
Am 01.09.2011 11:34, schrieb Frederic Peters:
Hello all,
This is 3.1.90, and it's out! It's the first beta of what will be
GNOME 3.2, enjoy it while it's time, the next beta (3.1.91) will
arrive next week.
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 11:25 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Shaun wrote:
I noticed that we have Contacts, Documents, and Sushi in the
apps moduleset. If shipped, all of these are just core parts
of the desktop experience, so I want to document them in the
desktop help. But I'm wary of doing
Hi Federico,
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:26 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
With the inclusion of gnome-documents, we are validating Tracker as
*the* metadata store for Gnome.
Kind of yeah; Tracker is pretty much an unique technology in the
platform though and I don't see many alternatives.
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 09:22 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 11:25 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Shaun wrote:
I noticed that we have Contacts, Documents, and Sushi in the
apps moduleset. If shipped, all of these are just core parts
of the desktop experience, so I want
Am 01.09.2011 15:22, schrieb Allan Day:
Hey Denis!
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Denis Washingtonden...@online.de wrote:
Am 01.09.2011 11:34, schrieb Frederic Peters:
Hello all,
This is 3.1.90, and it's out! It's the first beta of what will be
GNOME 3.2, enjoy it while it's time, the
On 01/09/11 14:41, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
Hi Federico,
Hi Cosimo,
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:26 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Can we please think about it as does Tracker allow me to implement an
innovative application that wasn't possible before rather than is
Tracker useful for Gnome?
On 1 September 2011 15:05, Denis Washington den...@online.de wrote:
Sounds interesting, though there is still the discoverability issue: you
would have to know that a long button press powers off, and that pressing
the power button gives you a shutdown method not accessible from the shell.
(In
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 14:22 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
Hey Denis!
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Denis Washington den...@online.de wrote:
Am 01.09.2011 11:34, schrieb Frederic Peters:
Hello all,
This is 3.1.90, and it's out! It's the first beta of what will be
GNOME 3.2, enjoy it
On 09/01/2011 11:06 AM, Shaun McCance wrote:
I just want to be clear for the docs. What is the behavior of
each of these two buttons? And doing something on long-press
is just the goal, but not actually implemented for 3.2?
Long-press on power button immediately cuts power to the machine, and
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.2
Total number: 15 bugs.
Comments (e.g. important issues that are missing in
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 18:50 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Data taken from Bugzilla (bug reports with GNOME Target field set):
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=REOPENEDbug_status=NEEDINFOcf_gnome_target=3.2
Total number: 15
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 17:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
gnome-control-center: Network: custom connections don't show up in the
list
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645094
There is an old patch by hadess available.
There isn't.
Oops, true.
Sorry, I think that refered to
Denis Washington den...@online.de a écrit:
True. As I said, I'm not looking for configurability, but for an
overall solution that allows to both suspend and power down.
And to hibernate, please.
--
Dodji
___
desktop-devel-list
Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011, à 18:50 +0200, Andre Klapper a écrit :
gnome-menus: Tools to perform system administration should be available
in the menus somehow
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645061
Patches available in the report.
(Note that the tools are available in the Other
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 11:25 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
Documents will just be a preview release, it shows the direction,
nothing more, nothing less, I don't think it's worth including it in
the desktop help for 3.2.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657520
Documents is on the dash
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 19:01 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 17:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
gnome-control-center: Network: custom connections don't show up in the
list
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645094
There is an old patch by hadess available.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
(Side note: I'm mildly bemused that we don't include our official
web browser in the favorites list of our showcase software.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650616
___
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 11:17 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
On 09/01/2011 11:06 AM, Shaun McCance wrote:
I just want to be clear for the docs. What is the behavior of
each of these two buttons? And doing something on
libgnomekbd: layout indicator issues
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642703
Patch available awaiting review.
Actually that patch was committed long ago. Will close the bug now.
Sergey
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 17:16 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
[...]
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Owen Taylor otay...@redhat.com wrote:
The idea of a GNOME Shell extension is to let the GNOME community
build on top of the GNOME Shell code base, to tweak, to customize, and
to prototype new
A) Make the plugin only tell the downloader what to download and not
to download it from.
You still need a key - even if the https:// authentication for gnome.org
itself to prove the connection is to the correct site.
B) Sign extension dowloads with a gnome.org private key.
A) is
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 22:35 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Of course, Linux users run unsandboxed code with arbitary capabilities
every day - applications, for example. So the security question with
GNOME Shell extensions is not how we can do the almost impossible job
of sandboxing them, but how
Le 21/08/2011 18:53, Djohn Heist a écrit :
I redid the template file and made it into an matrix so all modules and
goals share the same page. It is inspired by
http://people.gnome.org/~fpeters/299.html
you can have a look at it on https://live.gnome.org/DjohnHeist
I'm not sure this would be a
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Evandro Giovanini
efgiovan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657496
I hope we get some hardware that's a bit more advanced than this 1990's
behaviour in
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657496
I hope we get some hardware that's a bit more advanced than this 1990's
behaviour in the future.
Unlikely. Users like a way to get their system back into sane order.
Another reason a software option to power off is useful - it cleans up
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 00:18 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Evandro Giovanini
efgiovan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote:
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657496
I hope we get some
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Germán Póo-Caamaño g...@gnome.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 00:18 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On my laptop, I encounter enough hard lockups while testing software
that the long-press behaviour of the power button is essential for me.
I don't want to have
32 matches
Mail list logo
