>
>De: Narek Babadjanyan
>Para: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
>Enviado: lunes 12 de septiembre de 2011 16:55
>Asunto: GNOME 3 panel applets
>
>
>Hello, hackers! I have recently installed a package gnome-panel-devel and I
>would like to know if it supports GNOME 3's
I have read that the fallback mode is not actively developed, and besides
that who needs fallback if graphics card's drivers are fully supported (at
least in my case it's so), so you are right, I'm talking about the
gnome-shell-extensions.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> O
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 08:25:16PM +0530, Narek Babadjanyan wrote:
> Hello, hackers! I have recently installed a package gnome-panel-devel and I
> would like to know if it supports GNOME 3's panel, if no :'( , and if yes,
> could you please tell me where is the appropriate documentation?
What do y
GNOME3 does not use gnome-panel. You change change GNOME3's top panel
with GNOME Shell Extension.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Narek Babadjanyan wrote:
> Hello, hackers! I have recently installed a package gnome-panel-devel and I
> would like to know if it supports GNOME 3's panel, if no :'(
Hello, hackers! I have recently installed a package gnome-panel-devel and I
would like to know if it supports GNOME 3's panel, if no :'( , and if yes,
could you please tell me where is the appropriate documentation?
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
des
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> In a few months, newly uploaded tarballs on ftp.gnome.org will only be
> available as tar.xz. Change occurs after the last stable release of
> GNOME 3.2, approximately on Nov 16 2011. This only for *new* tarballs.
> All existing tarballs on f
On 09/12/2011 04:21 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
As others have said, I wish design had its own mailing list where I
could ask questions like this& not "spam" the whole developer list. I
don't think opening a bug is a good idea when the solution isn't clear
and using IRC for decision making (especial
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:09 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you can read in the Ryan blog post [1], the use of the
> AM_MAINTAINER_MODE macro is only correct when used in this way:
>
> AM_MAINTAINER_MODE([enable])
>
> As ryan said in the blog post, fredp made a report page for packa
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> I had a bug this week where the power was screwy and GNOME briefly
> thought my laptop was a desktop. I was awfully surprised to see that
> the Power panel in System Settings 3.2 has only one item "Suspend when
> inactive for...". This looks r
