On 05/10/2012 03:47 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
Hi, Adam! We met in Berlin at the Collabora party during the Desktop Summit.
You probably remember me as one of the authors of Solang.
For those who don't know Solang (http://git.gnome.org/browse/solang)
was a
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 02:47 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
So from Shotwell's point of view, would it make sense to replace its
existing SQLite store and UI? Would it not be as good as writing from
scratch?
Shotwell's database is presumably optimized for what Shotwell needs to
do. Tracker, as a
2012/5/9 Debarshi Ray rishi...@lostca.se
hello from Yorba, makers of Shotwell.
Hi, Adam! We met in Berlin at the Collabora party during the Desktop
Summit.
You probably remember me as one of the authors of Solang.
For those who don't know Solang (http://git.gnome.org/browse/solang)
was a
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
Shotwell is widely deployed and used, it has a team of people working on it,
and a commercial backer. These are VERY important things, prolly the most
important things to take into account, you worry too much about the data
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
...
That's not a reason at all, Yorba seems open to work on making Shotwell more
GNOME 3 friendly... so those widgets can be shared anyway
Therefore, for these reasons, if you look at the gnome-photos tree, it
is
On 05/10/2012 06:32 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 20:14 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Alberto Ruizar...@gnome.org wrote:
Shotwell is widely deployed and used, it has a team of people working on it,
and a commercial backer. These are
It is my understanding that Jon had discussions with the developers of these
applications, and for various reasons it was decided that writing something
from scratch is better. For EoG and GThumb the reason given was that their
maintainers did not have time to work on a major redesign, and for
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 19:10 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
snip
We would gladly ONLY index data that's of interest to the user/desktop
applications if you could come up with heuristics for that. I touched on
that somewhat in my response earlier. Also, having superfluous coverage
is better
The point is that we already use Tracker in GNOME (Documents and Boxes
depend on it) and I don't see any reason for existing apps to stop
using it and while we could compromise on some code-duplication, its
certainly a big issue if there is two entities harvesting metadata
from tons of
