Re: [Builder] Developer experience (DX) hackfest 2016

On Tue, 2015-12-29 at 12:56 +, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > The problem is that we already have an existing method that uses non > free software that is easy and does not require expert help to host > or join. What we were asking for is an alternative free software > service that provides a

Re: [Builder] Developer experience (DX) hackfest 2016

Mallory Knodel says that I can post her name and email address. Please write to her for instructions about free software streaming. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way!

Re: [Builder] Developer experience (DX) hackfest 2016

> The problem is that we already have an existing method that uses non free > software that is easy and does not require expert help to host or join. Using that method may be easy, but it is harmful to the free software cause. > What we were asking for is an alternative free software

Re: [Builder] Developer experience (DX) hackfest 2016

Den 30 dec. 2015 8:36 fm skrev "Christian Hergert" : > > I did contact her yesterday and the answer was jitsi. It seems > reasonable, but I haven't had a chance to test it out yet. > > https://jitsi.org/ I've used it once or twice and it worked fine then FWIW.

Re: [Builder] Developer experience (DX) hackfest 2016

The problem is that we already have an existing method that uses non free software that is easy and does not require expert help to host or join. What we were asking for is an alternative free software service that provides a similar setup experience to the non free solution. Telling us that you

Re: [Builder] Developer experience (DX) hackfest 2016

Le mardi 29 décembre 2015 à 12:56 +, Jasper St. Pierre a écrit : > If there is no free solution that has a similar easy setup > experience, perhaps the GNU project should invest in building such a > service. If you can afford to focus on WebRTC based solution, implementing an Open Source