I don't know where libgepub does belong in that list (core-deps
maybe?), but it's done[0]. I will try to get totem done.
Best regards,
[0] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782994#c1
2017-05-23 16:09 GMT+02:00 Javier Jardón :
> On 23 May 2017 at 10:14, Milan Crha
On 23 May 2017 at 10:14, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 09:55 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
>> I've been thinking on doing this for a while, so here you go:
>>
>> https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/MesonPorting
>
> Hi,
> do not count with evolution*
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Adrian Perez de Castro
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> No strong opinion here about GitLab, just a comment below...
>
> On Tue, 23 May 2017 11:21:25 +0200, Felipe Borges
> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> Cons:
>> - not a big fan of
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 15:13 +0300, Adrian Perez de Castro wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> No strong opinion here about GitLab, just a comment below...
>
> On Tue, 23 May 2017 11:21:25 +0200, Felipe Borges il.com> wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > Cons:
> > - not a big fan of the
Hi there,
No strong opinion here about GitLab, just a comment below...
On Tue, 23 May 2017 11:21:25 +0200, Felipe Borges
wrote:
> [...]
>
> Cons:
> - not a big fan of the merge-request workflow
> - we will have a bunch of useless forks across the users' accounts
I
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 11:50 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote:
> I would also be supportive of a solution using Phabricator+cgit. Phab
> for task management and patch review, since its task management is
> more
> powerful than gitlab’s, and its patch review workflow doesn’t have
> the
> problems of
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 11:21 +0200, Felipe Borges wrote:
>
> +1: I am supportive of the initiative.
>
> After catching up with the discussion, my personal pros and cons are:
>
> Pros:
>
> - code browsing is better than cgit
Seeing the history of a single file is unfortunately much harder than
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:12 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
>> I think we should remove this extension immediately.
>
> Hi,
> that sounds quite radical, does it not?
>
> Removing everything what has bugs, instead
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 09:55 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote:
> I've been thinking on doing this for a while, so here you go:
>
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/MesonPorting
Hi,
do not count with evolution* for now, please. I'm not willing to change
their build system again,
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:12 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> I think we should remove this extension immediately.
Hi,
that sounds quite radical, does it not?
Removing everything what has bugs, instead of fixing them, what would
you ship to your users?
> It provides limited value,
Hi,
On 22 May 2017 at 20:37, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Iñigo Martínez
> wrote:
>> Is there any application that no one is working on and that it would
>> be interesting to port it to meson?
>
> Why don't we set up a
11 matches
Mail list logo