Re: Porting applications to meson

2017-05-23 Thread Iñigo Martínez
I don't know where libgepub does belong in that list (core-deps maybe?), but it's done[0]. I will try to get totem done. Best regards, [0] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782994#c1 2017-05-23 16:09 GMT+02:00 Javier Jardón : > On 23 May 2017 at 10:14, Milan Crha

Re: Porting applications to meson

2017-05-23 Thread Javier Jardón
On 23 May 2017 at 10:14, Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 09:55 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote: >> I've been thinking on doing this for a while, so here you go: >> >> https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/MesonPorting > > Hi, > do not count with evolution*

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

2017-05-23 Thread Felipe Borges
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Adrian Perez de Castro wrote: > Hi there, > > No strong opinion here about GitLab, just a comment below... > > On Tue, 23 May 2017 11:21:25 +0200, Felipe Borges > wrote: > >> [...] >> >> Cons: >> - not a big fan of

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

2017-05-23 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 15:13 +0300, Adrian Perez de Castro wrote: > Hi there, > > No strong opinion here about GitLab, just a comment below... > > On Tue, 23 May 2017 11:21:25 +0200, Felipe Borges il.com> wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Cons: > > - not a big fan of the

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

2017-05-23 Thread Adrian Perez de Castro
Hi there, No strong opinion here about GitLab, just a comment below... On Tue, 23 May 2017 11:21:25 +0200, Felipe Borges wrote: > [...] > > Cons: > - not a big fan of the merge-request workflow > - we will have a bunch of useless forks across the users' accounts I

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

2017-05-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 11:50 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote: > I would also be supportive of a solution using Phabricator+cgit. Phab > for task management and patch review, since its task management is > more > powerful than gitlab’s, and its patch review workflow doesn’t have > the > problems of

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

2017-05-23 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 11:21 +0200, Felipe Borges wrote: > > +1: I am supportive of the initiative. > > After catching up with the discussion, my personal pros and cons are: > > Pros: > > - code browsing is better than cgit Seeing the history of a single file is unfortunately much harder than

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

2017-05-23 Thread Felipe Borges
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:12 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: >> I think we should remove this extension immediately. > > Hi, > that sounds quite radical, does it not? > > Removing everything what has bugs, instead

Re: Porting applications to meson

2017-05-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 09:55 +0100, Javier Jardón wrote: > I've been thinking on doing this for a while, so here you go: > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/MesonPorting Hi, do not count with evolution* for now, please. I'm not willing to change their build system again,

Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org

2017-05-23 Thread Milan Crha
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:12 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > I think we should remove this extension immediately. Hi, that sounds quite radical, does it not? Removing everything what has bugs, instead of fixing them, what would you ship to your users? > It provides limited value,

Re: Porting applications to meson

2017-05-23 Thread Javier Jardón
Hi, On 22 May 2017 at 20:37, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Iñigo Martínez > wrote: >> Is there any application that no one is working on and that it would >> be interesting to port it to meson? > > Why don't we set up a