Re: Pilot GitLab program

We are taking into account this too. Everything should work as expected, after a few days of adjustments and figureing out the details. I will update in here when we consider the projects completely moved and that they should work as expected, so you can start raising issues (apart of the ones

Re: Pilot GitLab program

Hi. On Di, 2017-06-27 at 14:23 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Please, let's stop this fetish about non-ff merges. Thanks for writing this. I've been confused by people insisting on "linear history" and the relatively strict configuration of GNOME's git servers. I hope that modules will be able

Re: Pilot GitLab program

Hi. On Di, 2017-06-27 at 10:54 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote: > However, understand that participating in the pilot program means a > commitment of moving to GitLab with your project for the time being How does that affect translations? Will the module not receive translations then? Cheers,  

Re: Pilot GitLab program

Please, let's stop this fetish about non-ff merges. If you like non-ff merges and linear history it's entirely up to your taste. Nothing "gets confused" about merge commits, and if your tooling gets confused then I strongly urge you to get better tools — which is the whole point of switching to

Re: Pilot GitLab program

Hey Michael, Indeed, unfortunately the current production instance continues withouth ff merge support (UI wise, UI hooks and feedback, etc.), and that will require more discussion with the GitLab team. In general, merges vs ff, I would leave that as a maintainer decision, but as you mention most

Re: Pilot GitLab program

On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 08:08 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Carlos Soriano   > wrote: > > Expect Nautilus and librsvg (with Federico) to move to the pilot  > > program this week. > > Cool. I would just suggest making sure that your interns

Re: Pilot GitLab program

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Carlos Soriano wrote: Expect Nautilus and librsvg (with Federico) to move to the pilot program this week. Cool. I would just suggest making sure that your interns are careful not to push a non-ff merge (i.e. not to use merge requests),

Re: Pilot GitLab program

Hey Adrien, It depends, I asked my interns and they wanted to move. Otherwise I wouldn't, of course. Keep in mind that this is an opt-in and small set of projects, no that we are actively encouraging it to do so, quite the oposite. However during all this process few maintainers were actively

Re: Pilot GitLab program

Wouldn't it be better to avoid migrating projects with interns working on them during the GSoC coding period? Cheers, Adrien Plazas On mar., juin 27, 2017 at 10:54 , Carlos Soriano wrote: Hello all, For a number of weeks we’ve been collecting feedback on our proposal

Pilot GitLab program

Hello all, For a number of weeks we’ve been collecting feedback on our proposal to consider GitLab as our code hosting, reviewing and issue tracking tool. First of all we would like to thank everyone who participated. We’ve been collecting the feedback on this wiki page: