Re: GNOME 3.35.2 released

2019-11-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 3:37 pm, Michael Catanzaro wrote: A couple modules were temporarily back I meant to write: "temporarily held back" ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org

GNOME 3.35.2 released

2019-11-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
Hello GNOME developers, GNOME 3.35.2 is now available. This is the second unstable release leading to the 3.36 stable series, and it's a pretty quiet one since our most prominent modules were not updated. A couple modules were temporarily back (gnome-boxes, vala, and totem-pl-parser) due to

Re: A little experiment: GNOME on wayland-only?

2019-11-24 Thread Florian Müllner
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 7:19 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 4:23 pm, Carlos Garnacho > wrote: > > Beyond that, AFAICT if other regular GNOME session services/apps > > indirectly rely on X11 at build/runtime, it's an oversight. > > Well there is libgnomekbd. That seems

Re: A little experiment: GNOME on wayland-only?

2019-11-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 4:23 pm, Carlos Garnacho wrote: If you still want to preserve X11 support, these modules do need to keep linking to X11 components: So our regular build has to continue to depend on X11 indefinitely, because we want to build flatpaks that work under X11. And distros

Re: A little experiment: GNOME on wayland-only?

2019-11-24 Thread Carlos Garnacho
Hi!, On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 2:14 PM Javier Jardón wrote: > Hi, > > This weekend I was curios about how difficult would be to have GNOME > in a wayland-only system > > Thanks to building GNOME in a sandbox (thanks to buildstream and > bwrap) and also thanks on using freedesktop-sdk as a base we

A little experiment: GNOME on wayland-only?

2019-11-24 Thread Javier Jardón
Hi, This weekend I was curios about how difficult would be to have GNOME in a wayland-only system Thanks to building GNOME in a sandbox (thanks to buildstream and bwrap) and also thanks on using freedesktop-sdk as a base we can easily control the whole stack, so I started to experiment [1] Not