Hi,
I'd like to propose swfdec-gnome for inclusion into the GNOME 2.22
desktop. Swfdec-gnome is a recent addition to the Swfdec project [1].
Its purpose is integration of Flash files into the Gnome desktop. It
currently provides a thumbnailer and a playback application for local
files similar to
Peter Gordon peter at thecodergeek.com writes:
Unfortunately, swfdec's dependency on ffmpeg/libmad for multimedia
decoding means that it cannot intrinsically be part of some distributions
such as Fedora without being hosted in a third-party repository of some
sort; and the current Gstreamer
Bastien Nocera hadess at hadess.net writes:
Hey Benjamin.
I think that using GStreamer for playback would be a must for swfdec to
be accepted as a blessed dependency (and thus swfdec-gnome added to the
desktop). We've been through not allowing other playback engines in the
past, so I don't
On Dec 27, 2007 8:34 PM, Andre Klapper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so i assume that using the gstreamer backend has been fixed in the
latest swfdec release?
Yes.
Swfdec is using GStreamer by default for video and audio decoding now
(and has been for the last 2 releases).
Cheers,
Benjamin
Brian Cameron Brian.Cameron at Sun.COM writes:
Section 3a seems of the Adobe SWF and FLV File Format Specification
License Agreement seems to be pretty clear that the specification
does not allow additional client programs, players, etc. to use
the format. Even if this has been implemented
I've just parsed the external dependencies for 2.22 [1] and noticed
some issues relating to swfdec-gnome.
1) Swfdec version
The Swfdec version has been set to 0.5.5. However, we plan to do a
0.6.0 release for Gnome 2.22 (see [2] for details).
Additionally, we want to track Swfdec git master from
On Jan 29, 2008 6:16 PM, Luca Ferretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Il giorno mar, 29/01/2008 alle 01.10 +0100, Benjamin Otte ha scritto:
Additionally, we want to track Swfdec git master from swfdec-gnome
until 0.6 is released. Is that ok - in particular with the jhbuild
people?
???
I
Havoc Pennington hp at pobox.com writes:
Wait, that's the whole point is to crash the app
The issue is that if it just prints stuff, people don't fix the bug
(in part, perhaps, because nothing goes through bug-buddy). Maybe the
fix is to bug-buddy the warning, but don't crash the app. Not
Matthias Clasen matthias.clasen at gmail.com writes:
It was pointed out to me that
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentythree/ExternalDependencies still
lists cairo 1.2.6 as minimum version.
I recently bumped the cairo dependency in GTK+ 2.13 to 1.6 (it already
was at 1.5.2 before).
I
Hey,
As Swfdec tracks GNOME development and provides a new major release
for every new GNOME release, we will release Swfdec 0.8 to go with it.
I hope updating the external dependencies is fine here.
Today Swfdec 0.7.4 was released and I updated the swfdec-gnome package
to not depend on Swfdec
Hey,
now that we've released Swfdec 0.8.0[1] I updated swfdec-gnome to use
it[2] and did a new release of it. I've updated the wiki page[3]
already.
Due to lack of time I did not update jhbuild etc though.
Cheers,
Benjamin
1:
pros:
- current proxy handling in GNOME is a huge mess, we're all lucky we can live
without proxies
- the API looks extremely sane
- there is nothing else that does proxying
- Dan (who is going to be the main - or only? - user of it) likes it
- active maintainers
- no bugs
cons:
- I'm (luckily)
Hi,
As you may be aware, we held a video hackfest last week in Barcelona.
Developers met to discuss how best to improve GPU support for video
applications. See http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/wiki/VideoHackfest
for more details. In particular, you might be interested in the notes
some people
to update modulesets and the wiki page.
Benjamin
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to bump the Cairo dependency for 1.10 for Gtk 3. Cairo 1.10
adds a few features that I
want to
read http://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2010/07/27/rendering-cleanup/ That
page will become the basis of what will be the porting documentation.
Benjamin
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
As many of you have already noticed, I've been frantically hacking
Do you pine for the nice days of GTK 1.3, when men were men and wrote
their own widgets? Are you without a nice project and just dying to
cut your teeth on a desktop you can try to modify for your needs? Are
you finding it frustrating when everything works on GNOME 2? No more
all-nighters to get a
Dodji Seketeli dodji at seketeli.org writes:
I personaly find
ChangeLogs quite valuable for situations where people have the source
packages (like a distribution DVD) but not necessarily an access to the
internet and want to understand when/how something changed. I found
myself in such a
Hey everyone,
If you read this mail, it's probably because GTK made your compile
fail. Again. It might be because the final part of the GTK3 rendering
cleanup has landed. This part only touches GDK APIs, so most
applications should not be affected at all.
If your app has been affected
Felipe Contreras felipe.contreras at gmail.com writes:
That doesn't change the fact that everyone understands the word happy.
http://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_kahneman_the_riddle_of_experience_vs_memory.html
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
Hey everyone,
So now with GNOME 3.2 out, it's time to make GTK break builds again.
So I deprecated GtkTable in GTK master[1]. GtkTable is turned more and
more problematic as GTK 3 evolves and the implementations of
height-for-width improved, which GtkTable does not support. So we were
ending up
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote:
This is a massive change to existing GtkBuilder .ui files so I would
suggest that somebody able to do xml and/or sed/grep magic would write a
script that just replaces GtkTable with GtkGrid in existing .ui files. If
that
Here's a heads-up on this patch: We've held up on applying this patch
to give developers a chance to get their servers fixed. But we want
this patch in 3.4, so it has now landed. So if you are running a GTK
= 3.3.19, you need to have an up to date X server or you'll see weird
focus behavior.
A
Colin Walters walters at verbum.org writes:
I'm not talking about the implementation details of the toggling
of the switch, but rather the fallout on the rest of the stack.
So, here's a simple technical overview of how the a11y stack works for a GTK app
(Clutter is similar). Imagine this as
Andre Klapper ak-47 at gmx.net writes:
Offtopic, but the obvious first step would be to improve the rate of
reviewed patches in general.
While peer reviews are great, **in some projects** teams miss manpower
already to have reviews at all, without any peer.
(And if you are a first-time
Marguerite Su i at marguerite.su writes:
what if after one or two years, a brand-new IM comes.
then you guys will remove all ibus codes and start what you do today again?
and after another one or two years, again again.
then it becomes you guys' life-time career to fix bugs and reinvent
12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
Colin Walters walters at verbum.org writes:
First, compiler warnings range widely in how important they are. Some
of them, like -Wmissing-prototypes, are pretty much always indicative of
a serious problem in
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Dan Winship d...@gnome.org wrote:
By that logic, you should never pass any extra -W options beyond -Wall
either, since those warnings apparently aren't important.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_implication_%28rule_of_inference%29
is not invertible like
27 matches
Mail list logo
