Hi,
I'd like to propose krb5-auth-dialog for inclusion into gnome 2.28. It's
a tray applet that can be used to acquire and renew Kerberos tickets
It optionally uses libnotify to alert about ticket exiration. When built
against heimdal Kerberos it supports pkinit (ticket acquisition via
smart
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:39:33PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.05.2009, 12:51 +0200 schrieb Guido Günther:
I'd like to propose krb5-auth-dialog for inclusion into gnome 2.28. It's
a tray applet that can be used to acquire and renew Kerberos tickets
It optionally
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:13:31PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:39:33PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
[..snip..]
Most of these aren't from krb5-auth-dialog itself. They were extracted
from com_err .et files of MIT Kerberos itself to make them translatable.
Restricting
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:33:04PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
346 translatable strings now, compared to 637. Way better. Thanks!
bean counting
...now 336. There were some properties in GtkSecureEntry that don't need
translation
/bean counting
But having no experience with KRB5/such auth stuff
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:36:52PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
The GNOME release-team will decide about module inclusions for GNOME
2.28 soon.
To the GNOME developers:
If you have not commented yet, if there is anything to add, if you have
questions to the maintainer: Please comment now.
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:33:12AM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 11:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le samedi 25 décembre 2010 à 10:40 +, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
Well, none of the currently available virtualization solution does it
correctly. Now what?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:02:19AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
With GNOME 3.0 going into code freeze any day now, it is high time
that we start looking beyond 3.0 and start collecting ideas and making
plans for what comes next. To that end, I have collected a list of
things that have fallen
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 04:48:57PM +, Philip Withnall wrote:
>7. The ability for a maintainer to push fixups to an old MR, or rerun
>failed CI pipelines on it, so that we don’t have to clone MRs to resurrect
>ones where the original author has wandered off; and people don’t
