As a wise man (okay, Claudio is not that wise) said [1]: watch
svn-commits-list and see translators rocking!
[1]
http://www.gnome.org/~csaavedra/news-2008-09.html#D20http://www.gnome.org/%7Ecsaavedra/news-2008-09.html#D20
Can't help but wonder, if he was just buttering us (transators) up
2008/9/22 Andre Klapper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The release-team is going to use gdm trunk for GNOME 2.24.
Oh bay, talk about a late notice. Thanks for the info.
Note that most release-team members have mixed feelings.
Entire discussion would have been less frustrating if gdm developers had
of
the users. Many, especially new users want recommendation, even though
diversity and freedom of choise is good and they probably enjoy that
too, they want recommendations.
Kind regards Kenneth Nielsen
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list
Here you go:
http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gnome-video-effects/
Translators: try msgmerge your existing cheese translation into the new pot
file of this module, about half of the strings can be copied over.
Regards
Gabor Kelemen
It would be really nice, if someone *cough cough* would whip
How are the release notes coming along? Remember, we also need time to
translate them.
Regards Kenneth
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
First I should say that I think this all look very good. Considering
the proposed goals and the previous feedback, I think you have come up
with some elegant solutions. Cheers.
+ we strongly encourage the application developers to follow the GNOME
development cycle. If a different
2010/10/12 Kenneth Nielsen k.nielse...@gmail.com:
2010/10/10 Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net:
Hi,
in
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-October/msg00060.html
the release-team announced its proposal for a reorganisation of the
current modulesets.
As the release-team aims
. L10N
To:
Cc: gnome-devel-l...@gnome.org, GNOME i18n list gnome-i...@gnome.org
Þann þri 12.okt 2010 12:25, skrifaði Kenneth Nielsen:
2010/10/10 Andre Klapperak...@gmx.net:
Hi,
in
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2010-October/msg00060.html
the release-team announced its
2010/10/12 Sandy Armstrong sanfordarmstr...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 15:03 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Good point. It's fair to expect projects not using the GNOME
development
cycle to publish a schedule with
It is time to cut back and focus on the core desktop a bit more, and
let the wider set of apps run a little more freely.
So all the core modules (Stable Platform, Core Desktop) must be on the
release schedule? That's at least reassuring.
The option to run on their own schedule is for modules
2010/10/12 Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de:
Hi!
Am Dienstag, den 12.10.2010, 18:30 + schrieb Og Maciel:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kenneth Nielsen k.nielse...@gmail.com
wrote:
Implementable workflow (3). (A) again is status quo, not much to say
about that. Transifex (C
2010/10/12 Gabor Kelemen kelem...@gnome.hu:
2010-10-12 17:41 keltezéssel, Gil Forcada írta:
Then l10n.gnome.org should make commits in the git.gnome.org version and
the maintainer should only had to pick the translations from there.
No, please do not want to rely on then the maintaner will
2010/10/12 Claude Paroz cla...@2xlibre.net:
Sorry, I was away for some days and wasn't able to give my opinion
sooner.
First of all, I'd like to support that using the GNOME infrastructure is
invaluable for translators. It is not rare for us to commit in modules,
(POTFILES.in, translator
2010/10/15 daniel g. siegel dgsie...@gnome.org:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted
outside of git.gnome.org don't always feel
2010/10/16 daniel g. siegel dgsie...@gnome.org:
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 03:05 +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
2010/10/15 daniel g. siegel dgsie...@gnome.org:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hi!
As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
Hallo everyone
I think this thread is about reaching the length where we need to make
something happen, or nothing will come of it and we are all doomed to
repeat the whole thing the next time this issue arises. So lets try
and sum up:
The solution of having a translations only copy of a module
2010/10/18 Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de:
Hi!
Then we can afterwards continue discussing whether we should/need to
add an offer for a external translation framework that is also GNOME
approved (e.g. Transifex, Launchpad ,).
Note that Transifex is not an *external* solution as we
2010/10/18 Dimitris Glezos gle...@indifex.com:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Kenneth Nielsen k.nielse...@gmail.com
wrote:
The solution of having a translations only copy of a module in gnome
git, combined with some sort of automatic syncing back and forth,
seems to a good solution
I'm interested to know what is going to happen about the module set
reorganization now. We had the second proposal presented, we had a
HUGE discussion about pros and cons with a lot of different views on
this. So now what?
- Will this be implemented?
- If so when?
- Or will there be another
Bump
2010/11/18 Kenneth Nielsen k.nielse...@gmail.com:
I'm interested to know what is going to happen about the module set
reorganization now. We had the second proposal presented, we had a
HUGE discussion about pros and cons with a lot of different views on
this. So now what
Den 28-09-2011 18:13, Cosimo Cecchi skrev:
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 18:03 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
Not sure if possible, but can you ensure the new git repositories aren't
too big in size? E.g. try and purge stuff that doesn't belong.
Forgot to mention this in the previous mail, but I made
Den 06-10-2011 20:44, Cosimo Cecchi skrev:
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 12:59 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
You probably already figured this out, but here's the commands that
seemed to work for me:
$ cd po/
$ for po in *.po; do intltool-update ${po%.po}; done
$ sed -i.bak '/#~/d' *.po
$ for po in *.po;
Hallo developers.
Since the release of GNOME 3.4 we have received a steady stream of
emails saying This is not a string freeze break, we just forgot to mark
the strings for translation. So much so, that the statistics e.g. for
my language (which has not been touched since release) now counts
Den 07-05-2012 14:04, Jorge González skrev:
Hello,
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Kenneth Nielsenk.nielse...@gmail.com wrote:
Hallo developers.
Since the release of GNOME 3.4 we have received a steady stream of emails
saying This is not a string freeze break, we just forgot to mark the
I don't mean to be a buzz kill here but IRC clients seem to be dime a
dozen. Wouldn't it be possible to take an existing engine and redress it in
GNOME 3 wear, possibly even reuse some of the GUI strings and translations?
\Kenneth
2013/10/4 Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com
On Thu,
25 matches
Mail list logo
