In terms of User Experience I've grown to love the mac style sheet dialog
[1] for password prompts. It's not often that I'll recommend a dialog, or a
modal dialog for user interactions. However sheets seem to have most of the
properties you want when a password is required from an application.
On 9/12/07, Kalle Vahlman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/9/11, Bryan Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
GNOME is not in need of a DSCM or any other kind of new SCM. For source
control, SVN works fine, just like CVS worked fine. I'm not looking to
argue the features of one DSCM above another or what
On 9/10/07, Kevin Kubasik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few key points:
* There is a _very_ strong general opinion that Gnome should eventually
move to a DSCM system, it is really just a discussion of how and when.
* The 3 systems under consideration are bzr,git, and hg. There has not
been
On 11 Sep 2007 22:37:55 +0200, Soeren Sandmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:41 -0400, Bryan Clark wrote:
GNOME is not in need of a DSCM or any other kind of new SCM. For
source control, SVN works fine, just like CVS
On 8/28/07, David Zeuthen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 17:33 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
- fix Firefox to use the keyring, or at least let apps query Firefox
password manager storage
- have some mechanism for smart deductions, like I can guess you
have an XMPP
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2007/8/9, Bryan Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi ~
(so late... email problems)
In the video I saw of your prototype I believe it makes perfect
sense to
simply store the URI of a person's background / theme from the new
Calum Benson wrote:
On 10 Aug 2007, at 17:45, Bryan Clark wrote:
I'll try to put together a mockup or two for a new background chooser
that incorporates this. Right now my current mockup could be called a
mashup between the background chooser and the screensaver dialog as it
has pieces
Hi ~
(so late... email problems)
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2007/8/8, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 10:57 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
Some thoughts on near-term goals and steps to get things
Bryan Clark wrote:
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
An issue with the mockups is that the outside accounts list is shown
as private, but since we're sharing one database with Mugshot, if you
add those accounts they will be public over on mugshot.org
Basically the public/private rules
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Havoc Pennington
- modify mugshot.org/applications (to become
online.gnome.org/applications) to support web apps
- make online.gnome.org and mugshot.org work as OpenID providers
Quick Q about these
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
An issue with the mockups is that the outside accounts list is shown
as private, but since we're sharing one database with Mugshot, if you
add those accounts they will be public over on mugshot.org
Basically the public/private rules can't differ between
Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 11:35 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 00:25 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
I do think the XSMP state-saving model is absurd and should be ignored,
however, even if XSMP is used for logout notification.
yeah, I
Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
På Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:41:03AM -0400, JP Rosevear skrev:
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 13:17 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 12:22 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Hi Jeff;
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 21:01 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 09:11 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
Alex,
It is my understanding that a blessed GNOME application is to be built
using GNOME-sanctioned tool-chains, frameworks, and applications.
Other functionality that requires external dependencies
Jan de Groot wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:26 +0300, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/2.0/icons-design.html
in Problems to avoid there reads
Do not include meaningful text in icons.
On the same page is talked about text in icons when it comes to
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Most of the control-center capplets are immediate-apply
(except for ones which have very good reason not to be),
and all of then have a Close button. All ? No, not all.
The background capplet considers it better to have
a Finish button instead...
I have asked to fix
Richard Hughes wrote:
24th April is the end of new modules proposal period.
Are there any unaddressed concerns or questions regarding
gnome-power-manager that people want to ask?
FWIW I think this project is awesome and should be 'blessed' into GNOME,
it's made a large improvement to power
Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 16:03 -0400, Bryan Clark wrote:
Richard Hughes wrote:
24th April is the end of new modules proposal period.
Are there any unaddressed concerns or questions regarding
gnome-power-manager that people want to ask?
FWIW I think
What I'm seeing seems like lack of guidance along with the other points
you mentioned. For instance this release team reason:
+ gnome-power-manager: people like it, but some mor work is needed,
and more integration should be done. It won't go in for 2.14, but
we'd like to see a
I don't have a problem me tooing this request, since I think I've been
asking for spell checking for all text-entry widgets for the past two
years as well as a richer textview widget. IMHO we should have a
textview widget that is good enough to pretty much replace
GtkHTMLEditor, with undo/redo
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 18:26 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Categories *do* help people find what they're looking for, ask any
secretary :), it's true that's it's more or less far from the ideal
where we want to arrive, but I think it's a lot closer than the current
preferences status. Right now
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 20:57 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
It's not that categorization should be stripped entirely from the
desktop. Categories do provide good ways of sorting items and are
valuable keywords in searches. Most search systems I recommend [1]
incorporate search and browse
I've said no to this stuff several times already. Like Jonathan said I
think Evince can do a great job viewing vector based documents, however
I think it will be a bad idea to use it as a viewer for these other
documents.
Creating viewer/editor combo applications means that people have to
figure
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 21:28 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Bryan Clark
(Just to note that this is satire-ish, I don't really want to cause pain
and there are many other ways of getting people focused, however none
really take the problem of slow to no innovation as head
Hey ~
I'm requesting a break in the 2.10 freeze for bug 167090 [*] to go
through. I put some detailed reasons in the first comment of that bug.
Plus there is also some fascinating commentary by me in comment 13 of
bug 161613 [**] regarding the same issue. ;-)
Simply put I'd like to remove the
25 matches
Mail list logo
