On 08/03/2014 03:38 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
- Make a whole bunch of changes all at once, some of which are
related to X, some to Y, some to Z, and some to more than one of
them, and without any indication of which changes relate to which
commit so no one in the future will
On 08/02/2014 10:38 AM, David Woodhouse wrote:
If I use git correctly and push the *merge*, however, then my original
work is preserved. Someone later trying to work out what happened has
actually got a correct version of history to refer back to, and the
problem can be correctly tracked down
On 04/26/2013 10:12 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 08:46 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
You are not going to get me to buy eagerly into a new installed tests
scheme for glib if it means that I have to give up make check.
Well, would you be OK with:
$ jhbuild make
$
On 04/25/2013 10:21 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
See:
https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests
Installed tests go in /usr/bin/testname-installed-test.
That seems unnecessary, since they're not run as part of ordinary system
operation, and it will pollute autocompletion. I think it would
On 02/27/2013 08:26 PM, Nikita Churaev wrote:
Introspection developers have already introduced (skip) mark for such
return values, but they won't add it to existing API to avoid backwards
incompatibility. What about adding (skip2) mark that only Gjs will use
and replace it to (skip) when GNOME
On 02/26/2013 02:39 AM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
In file included from ../../../glib/libcharset/localcharset.c:28:
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-mingw32msvc/4.2.1-sjlj/../../../../i586-mingw32msvc/include/stdio.h:372:
error: no previous prototype for 'getc'
This is a bug in whatever version of mingw you are
On 09/08/2012 04:20 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
- libsecret migration
I thought that wasn't a blocker for 3.6?
LIBSOUP
===
- drop SoupPasswordManagerGNOME
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679866
Related to the libsecret migration.
That's not intended for 3.6.
On 07/28/2012 08:58 AM, Benjamin Otte wrote:
Second, I don't think you are the right person to determine which warnings are
or are not important. Apparently the GCC developers think otherwise and I
frankly trust them more than I trust you.
By that logic, you should never pass any extra -W
On 09/23/2011 07:58 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
I think that will add too much burden on the people who have to approve?
I don't track RSS at all. Release-team gets a lot of freeze breaks and I
want to be notified immediately, not after a delay. I need to see the
comments that other teams make
On 09/01/2011 11:06 AM, Shaun McCance wrote:
I just want to be clear for the docs. What is the behavior of
each of these two buttons? And doing something on long-press
is just the goal, but not actually implemented for 3.2?
Long-press on power button immediately cuts power to the machine, and
On 04/20/2011 07:12 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
4) While I know some GNOME contributors here don't like Mozilla, in
the big picture their mission and culture is *MUCH* more aligned with
ours than Apple, at least
But:
(a) WebKit is probably the least Apple-like thing that Apple does
(b)
On 07/01/2010 04:15 AM, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
VERSION=2.22.5
LAST_INTERFACE_CHANGE=2.22.0
LAST_INTERFACE_BREAK=2.20.0
I like this (though I think you'll need a few more variables to make
this be able to pick up where the version numbers from the previous
system left off).
On 06/30/2010 11:25
On 05/07/2010 09:12 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 2010-05-07 03:00, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 09:36:22PM -0500, Stef Walter wrote:
Does anyone know if we have a GNOME OID, whether allocated through IANA
directly or through another private.enterprise?
You mean 1.3.6.1.4.1.3319 ?
belatedly...
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:42:02, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:42:58PM -0600, Ted Gould wrote:
Q: Does this fit the the design goals for GNOME Shell?
A: I can't speak for the designers of GNOME Shell but they've talked
about how the top panel should behave like a
On 01/13/2010 07:47 AM, Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno dom, 22/11/2009 alle 16.32 -0800, Sandy Armstrong ha scritto:
Most users I've spoken to about this prefer ctrl+tab because it is
similar to alt+tab, and can be invoked with only the left hand.
Ctrl+PgUp/Down can be invoked with only
I branched libsoup for 2.28. Also, I support the recommendation to stop
requiring branch announcements.
-- Dan
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On 10/14/2009 05:24 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 13.10.2009 22:42, Dan Winship napsal(a):
OMG ITS TEH WINDOWS REGISTRY!!!1!1II|! IF ANY APP WRITES A SINGLE BYTE
WRONG THEN ALL OF YOUR APPS WILL BREAK AND YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO LOG IN
ANY MORE
+1 :)
People who are not able to learn from
On 10/13/2009 10:17 AM, Ryan Lortie wrote:
login / app launch across tens of tiny files, and that the authoritative
data store is somewhat human readable ? :-)
yes and yes (but probably you meant no).
Data is in a single file, and humans can read it with the right tools.
'cat' is not one
On 08/04/2009 06:16 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 23:15 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi,
I've reported bug 590774[1] against gnome-terminal. The problem is that it
reads
some defaults (monospace font) from GConf, but that schema is provided by
libgnome. Since
On 07/29/2009 09:51 AM, Johannes Schmid wrote:
Hmm, yes that definitely looks different than I expected. I am not
entirely sure though if it makes sense to have labels in the toolbar at
all because it would be way better if icons would be self-explaining.
Right. The idea isn't label the
On 07/22/2009 02:21 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Christian Fredrik Kalager
Schallerura...@gnome.org wrote:
So I would like to ask the GNOME release team to please come forward
and clearly state that the future of GNOME is to be a linux desktop
system as
On 07/15/2009 04:41 AM, Richard Henwood wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm developing an application which current has 'libwnck' as the only
external dependency which is not part of the Gnome dependable dependencies as
listed on:
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven/ExternalDependencies
As
Kjartan Maraas wrote:
Time to move forward for everyone? Anyone else using clutter and thus
need to port to the new version first?
It's up to whoever is using it. 0.8 and 1.0 are co-installable.
I got the impression the only other user was gnome-shell. gnome-shell
developers are you ok with
Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
I like the more verbose format clearly showing which changes are big and
which
are small.
Well, I don't really disagree that its nice to know. However, all such
info is readily availible in git
Right.
Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 10:00 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
Here's something to generate a fairly traditional-looking ChangeLog
(though working on the assumption that you're doing the subject vs body
split in your git commit messages):
git log --date=short --pretty=format
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dan Winship d...@gnome.org wrote:
[...]
So, actually, what exactly IS the use case of ChangeLog if there is git
history on one end and NEWS on the other? Who are the people who need
more information than NEWS gives, but who would
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Cons:
- Have to modify autogen.sh to create an empty ChangeLog, or pass the
foreign flag to automake
We really ought to be passing foreign anyway. No one benefits from
having people be forced to create 0-length README files. (And if we want
to say but people should
Luca Ferretti wrote:
I think that applets developers are legitimate to be worried about
their own efforts, the only reference in gnome-shell stuff is Design
an applet/add-on system in Open Design Question.
The original hackfest writeup
Owen Taylor wrote:
Thanks to Shaun McCance there's no need to worry about how to create a
DOAP file, just find your module in:
http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/pulse/web/
And select the Download DOAP template file link to get a DOAP file for
your module that you can then edit as necessary.
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi Dan,
Dan Winship wrote:
Plans for 2.28 are not nailed down, but are mostly being driven by
WebKit at this point (with bug reports, feature requests, and patches
coming from both the Epiphany and Midori developers). Features currently
in progress include
I branched libsoup for 2.26 and updated jhbuild.
Plans for 2.28 are not nailed down, but are mostly being driven by
WebKit at this point (with bug reports, feature requests, and patches
coming from both the Epiphany and Midori developers). Features currently
in progress include better
Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:20 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
* Still to discuss: dconf vs gconf. This is not yet covered by
this plan, but crucial to discuss (as gconf depends on
Bonobo)
There is gconf-dbus, the long-standing port of GConf to DBus that
Imendio
Alexander Larsson wrote:
So, there has been a lot of attention on the internets recently about
the the desktop file virus issue.
I think its all pretty overblown, and any solution we have that doesn't
completely neuter the feature will just involve users learning to work
around the issue in
Ghee Teo wrote:
Dan Winship wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Sounds fine to me to change the wrong key name. But is the description
factually true ? The last time I checked, gnome-session would not
bring
nautilus back when I killed it, until I added the autorestart key to
the nautilus
Luca Ferretti wrote:
Il giorno ven, 13/02/2009 alle 09.14 -0500, Dan Winship ha scritto:
No, gets restarted automatically if it exits and gets started when
you log in even if it's not part of the session are completely
independent, and the problem was that the required-components key
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Sounds fine to me to change the wrong key name. But is the description
factually true ? The last time I checked, gnome-session would not
bring
nautilus back when I killed it, until I added the autorestart key to
the nautilus desktop file.
It's poorly-worded. It's
Dave Neary wrote:
- Should we just ditch the docs and declare the UI self-explanatory ?
Definitely not.
Why not? Seems like no one has ever bothered to file bug reports about
the fact that they're wrong... Maybe there are as few people reading the
docs as there are writing them. In a
Natan Yellin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Dan Winship d...@gnome.org
mailto:d...@gnome.org wrote:
Maybe there are as few people reading the
docs as there are writing them. In a corporate setting, people will call
their help desk when they have problems, and in a home
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
[0] I'm reasonably sure it has some. not as the one proposed to avoid
pissing off somebody somewhere because we want to be inclusive -- no,
lemme rephrase that: we are *fucking afraid of committment*. seriously:
an abstraction over DVCS? what have we become? are we
Michael Banck wrote:
FYI, a member of the Debian security team raised concerns:
WPAD is a broken protocol with security issues inherent to the DNS
devolution mechanism (which is also performed by libproxy). Please
don't add implementations to the Debian archive.
Bastien Nocera wrote:
All the changes you mention were already part of GNOME 2.22. I agree
that the add location dialogue might be a bit complicated, but you
certainly don't need to add longitude and latitude by hand...
Adding locations got improved in 2.24, but unfortunately the new UI is
Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 22:43 +0530, shirish wrote:
Now what code should be put up there?
a METAR/Airport code.
http://adds.aviationweather.gov/metars/stations.txt tells me that for
Pune, it's VAPO.
But that station is inactive, so adding it won't actually help. (If
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
Red October seems appropriate as the project will eventually surrender
itself for reimplementation ;)
Red October GNOME?
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/1999-October/msg00020.html
-- Dan
___
Mikael Hallendal wrote:
Translations is often brought up as a tricky part for this, can we
handle them in a way where they are agnostic to the VCS system the
modules happen to be in.
We already have a lot of the logic; if you've got jhbuild set up,
jhbuild update MODULENAME will check out any
Felipe Contreras wrote:
There's also:
4. Do the actual proxified communication
Who is supposed to add the SOCKS 4/5 headers and HTTP proxy stuff? I
don't think libsoup (an HTTP library) is supposed to do that, since
other protocols will need to do the same (IRC, FTP, etc).
SOCKS will
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008, à 14:38 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
Bastien already wrote about Fedora policy, httpd is disabled by
default. I know that Debian policy is to consider that the user
installing a server wants it to be started. From what I read of
Patryk,
Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
2008-10-23 klockan 16:14 skrev Patryk Zawadzki:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
Any plans on making it work without pushing Apache HTTPd onto
desktops? A small
I branched libsoup for 2.24. (Actually, I did this last week and just
never sent mail.) Someone already updated jhbuild. Not cc'ing docs and
i18n since libsoup has neither.
Plans for 2.26: unclear. The burst of activity around
libsoup+webkit+epiphany last spring that then quickly died out seems
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The basic format of the desktop entry file requires that there be a
group header named Desktop Entry. There may be other groups present
in the file... There should be nothing preceding
Alan Cox wrote:
GTK/Glib are not the biggest problem here. You also use C library
functions in Gnome applications. Glib/Gtk+ works with the C library in C
locale simply because ASCII is a subset of UTF-8. That ceases to work the
moment you introduce UTF-8 bytesequences into non utf-8 locales.
Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:05 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
- Mexico: 8 timezones, many locations, not divided into states,
so I didn't even try sorting them out. Everything got
America/Mexico_City
Fixed all of Mexico (added states and capitals
Lucas Rocha wrote:
Hi Dan,
2008/4/7, Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Brazil: /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab lists 15 zones. I did not
even bother trying to figure them out, and assigned the whole
country to America/Sao_Paulo.
There are 4 timezones in Brazil. Have a look
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 03:39:57PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 15:15 +, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:26:55PM -0800, Peter Gordon wrote:
Using childlish references (such as M$ and Microvell) is immature
and
I've just merged the libsoup-2.4 branch to svn trunk. This is a big API
break that fixes a ton of problems with libsoup. Coming soon: new
features! Language bindings!
I've filed bugs in bugzilla with patches for bug-buddy, evolution,
evolution-data-server, evolution-exchange, evolution-webcal,
Alan wrote:
Hoping I'm not stating the obvious, but a GNOME? Maybe borrow a garden
gnome from the neighbors if you don't have one? :)
And then, after taking its picture, mail it to someone else on the docs
team who lives in another country so they can take a picture too...
-- Dan
Piotr Gaczkowski wrote:
Hi!
I am interested if somebody is currently working on a GNet-like
library based on GObject?
The gvfs ftp backend is going to need sockets/tcp/dns/etc support, but
gio doesn't currently provide anything there and I'm not sure what the
plan is for that...
Anyway,
Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 10:05 -0500, Dan Winship wrote:
H
Can you check out http://live.gnome.org/LibSoup/DesktopWideHttp and see
if there's anything missing?
This looks good overall.
Are there any libsoup python bindings?
No, no one has ever asked about doing
I branched libsoup for 2.20 and updated jhbuild.
Note that there has not been a libsoup release since 2.18 went out, due
to a blocker in HEAD, and so the 2.20 branch is branched from the same
point as the 2.18 branch, even though there are additional fixes in HEAD
(which will eventually see
Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 05:16 +, Nate Nielsen wrote:
I was put off by the fact that Evolution, NSS, and many other projects
have Berkeley DB as part of their source rather than depending on it as
a library.
Anyone with inside know if this is due to incompatibilities
Nate Nielsen wrote:
I'm also looking forward to the possibility of including SSH agent
functionality in gnome-keyring (similar to how Mac OS X KeyChain works)
which again, would need a single key store (in ~/.ssh), with private
keys encrypted by the gnome-keyring 'master password'.
Hm... I'm
I've branched libsoup for gnome-2-18. You know the drill. (Not cc:ing
docs or i18n lists because libsoup has neither.)
Plans for 2.20? Well, maybe I'll finally do the long-awaited ABI break I
originally claimed I was going to do for 2.14.[1] Or maybe not.
People who are using libsoup (or who
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:30 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 17:54 +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote:
You can safely remove PKG check from configure and build g-vfs without
smallest problems. You can even run all major GNOME apps without it.
Forcing people to use
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 10:16 -0500, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
- Ripping out libgnomeui is probably a good idea anyway regardless
of application startup time, if only to put more distance between
modern app developers and stale, old, depricated widgets/code
pet-peeveThere is no i
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 10:33 -0500, Rodney Dawes wrote:
It would be nice if CVS were at least able to be used read-only, so that
those of us with changes in our local trees, can ensure that we're up to
date with the final point of CVS, and can generate diffs to apply
against SVN when migrating
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 13:36 +, Calum Benson wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 14:51 -0700, Scott Reeves wrote:
I find the filter feature significantly helps with the “too many
capplets” issue. One strength of the new shell is it dynamically
displays the filtered list of choices as you type
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 21:26 +0100, Jamie McCracken wrote:
First to clarify, tracker is not a dedicated indexer (like Beagle and
Strigi) but is first and foremost a database which has indexing as a
side feature.
Are there any *currently existing* GNOME applications that make use of
tracker's
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 17:54 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Owen was showing me FC6 this morning, and it does seem to work out
nicely having metacity handle the old video hardware and compiz handle
the new, with a simple toggle between them. The only real glitch in it
was that compiz uses
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 18:32 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Dan Winship wrote:
If compiz used workspaces instead of viewports, you wouldn't be able to
have a window wrapped around an edge of the cube and thus partially
visible on two different sides.
Just not true, afaik - that's what I
Joe Shaw wrote:
Here's a quick rundown of the things people decided to work on:
* Dan Winship - As a broader goal desktop goal, decided to look
into moving Beagle to Cmake and learn its strengths and
weaknesses.
So, mostly I did this because I was just hanging out
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
* Call it libgtkdesktop and include in GTK source? Or in GTK proper?
This makes sense for some of the stuff, like:
* screensaver (see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305688).
This could be merged with Dan's work on Gtk/GdkSession, and we could add
there all
Frederic Crozat wrote:
From the feedback we got during Mandriva 2007.0 beta test, people got
busted by bugs which was been fixed in either kwin or metacity, mainly
on focus stealing.
Yeah, the compiz and metacity hackers got together at GUADEC and
everyone agreed that it would be a great idea
Rob Adams wrote:
Why bother when both the GNOME and KDE projects already have excellent
window managers? I don't understand this idea of writing a whole new
window manager just to add eye candy. There's nothing about compositing
that requires a complete rewrite of the window manager. The
Toby Smithe wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 01:33 +0200, Marco Cabizza wrote:
So, can the metacity compositor link against something else - i.e. a
compiz backend? - or is it just stalled ?
Well, I know nothing of how it currently works, but I do believe that
the best solution would be to
I've started a page about this on the wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/SessionManagement
-- Dan
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Havoc Pennington wrote:
I don't think you're crazy, but can I suggest a good approach might be:
- start from what the user benefits / scenarios are
- figure out in a top-down way what API we'd like _apps_ to have
- then figure out how to implement that or something like it
Well, I would
An innocent bystander who I'm going to flame now wrote:
I doubt we can do Topaz within the comfort of our tried and true 6 month
cycle and we do need to decide what Topaz is going to be at some point.
But how can you say that we can't do Topaz in the 6 month cycle when you
admit that WE DON'T
In the last year or so, it's become fashionable to suggest ripping
XSMP out of GNOME and moving to a new, improved, simpler, presumably
dbus-based session management system. I'd like to argue that that's a
bad idea, and we should fix gnome-session and GnomeClient while still
sticking with XSMP.
Jeff Waugh wrote:
I haven't really heard much of a critical response to these ideas, just more
ber, Desktop, Desktop, Desktop, get it all in Desktop stuff. Why does it
need to be in Desktop? Why do we have to jam everything in Desktop? Can we
ship it in Powertools (a suite that has been
Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Dan Winship
The big missing piece here is translation. Alex can't personally translate
Tomboy into all 52 languages, but the translators don't have time to
translate every single GNOME app in the universe either. So if we want to
consider Tomboy to be in, GNOME
* Should we include Gtk# in the Bindings suite?
- short term
- it hasn't been proposed for 2.16, but we could grandfather it in
It was proposed actually:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-April/msg00457.html
-- Dan
___
Jeff Waugh wrote:
* Without a doubt, Tomboy is pure awesome.
* We don't have to integrate *everything* into the Desktop suite. That was
never its purpose. The Desktop suite is all about the OOTB (out of the
box) desktop user experience.
I don't get it. Don't we want the out of the
Luis Villa wrote:
* distros are all crap at getting their bugs upstream, pretty much.
(Some are slightly better than others, at various times.)
So now that we've got XML-RPC support in bugzilla, it would be insanely
cool if someone could write interfaces and code to let you do
cross-bugzilla
Rich Burridge wrote:
I've seen GNOME steadily improve over the last few years, but it still
doesn't have a cohesive wholeness to it. One of the problems in this
respect is that different distros customize GNOME as they see fit.
That's totally backwards. GNOME doesn't have a cohesive wholeness
Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
So, after 7 days of deliberations, what are the results?
Technically we still have 6 more days to deliberate.
Is Mono/GTK# going to be included as part of the desktop OR binding 2.16.x
platform, or not? A clear 'yes' or 'no' please.
AFAIR, the only objections to
Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
Rodrigo gently raises the seminal question, What is so different?.
The answer is known: It is that enormous elephant standing in the corner
that folks have been politely tip-toeing around, trying to ignore.
Tiptoeing around the issue is NOT polite at this
Darren Kenny wrote:
Again I think people seriously need to get out of the mind-set that there is
only one desktop user on a machine - so a couple of meg for 1 user isn't a
lot -
but for 100 users on a single machine (even with 256Mb of RAM per user) there
is
a huge impact in that tiny
Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
Does it make sense to you to use have three or four different DOM
parsers in memory at the same time?
No, it doesn't, but we already have three XML(ish) parsers linked into
every C-based GNOME app (libxml2, expat, and GMarkup). And yet, GNOME is
*better* now than
Elijah Newren wrote:
* orca (as a replacement to gnopernicus)
* alacarte
* gnome-power-manager
* Tomboy
* Gtk#
Yay, I have no clue, Yay, Yay, and Yay, respectively.
There's one additional issue to address as well:
* Okay to have desktop modules depend on gtk# bindings?
The argument
Andrew Sobala wrote:
And it can *all* be done *now.* That's the point. It's big. It's hard.
It's a lot of work. But there's nothing to stop any of these ideas being
implemented. And when we have the code to make this all work, we can
build something new: the next generation desktop, and
Kalle Vahlman wrote:
On 3/15/06, Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have recently acquired a 24 screen and I must say things are not so
simple. Fitt's law works for small screens, but not for big ones.
nitpick
You probably mean this application of Fitt's law here. Fitt's law is
not
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 13:33 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
- David's recent point in this thread about the desktop release set
not being so important also rings true to me. It's a binary in-or-out
yet there are lots of really rocking Gnome programs that are well
Davyd Madeley wrote:
Some of us
care that the GNOME we ship and give out tarballs for is sane and cogent
and makes sense by itself.
But it doesn't make sense by itself. GNOME doesn't contain a kernel, a C
library, or an X server. It only contains half of a printing
architecture (the half that
Alan Cox wrote:
So if Fedora, Ubuntu and every other Gnome using distribution also start
doing tons of private development
(Excluding Xgl, there was hardly tons of private development.)
then trying to jam it all in CVS
afterwards how do you expect Gnome to develop when all these variants
Luis Villa wrote:
On 2/7/06, JP Rosevear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The changes that were implemented were not as radical as the
mockups. Basically what Nat F. showed in Paris is what was
implemented. The code will be released to the community soon.
To ask the obvious question, why not now,
I put it in emotive terms because *someone* has to offset all the
hugging and back-slapping about Dan's mail.
Er. Yeah well.
Anyway, I just reread Jono's original message and corresponding blog post
again, and it still seems to me that he was talking solely about the GNOME-
UI-related stuff in
I branched libsoup for gnome-2-12 and updated jhbuild. (libsoup has
neither translatable strings nor user documentation, so I'm not cc:ing
those lists.)
Plans for 2.14 include:
* Finally using the GNOME proxy settings from gconf (including
ignore_hosts) by default (*)
* A patch
Matthew Thomas wrote:
On 19 Oct, 2005, at 2:49 PM, Bill Haneman wrote:
Matthew said:
In Windows 2000 and (I think) Windows XP, all access key underlines
are hidden by default.
http://www.microsoft.com/enable/training/windowsxp/
hideunderlines.aspx This makes the interface less ugly,
97 matches
Mail list logo
