On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 19:42 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 19 August 2011 14:13, Felipe Contreras
> > wrote:
> >> Is there anyone in the universe able to create a user survey worthy of
> >> GNOME? Can you convince him of doing so?
>
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 16:13 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> My main fears in a setup like this is:
>
> * Conceptually a "chat" app needs to be running all the time when you're
> online (as you might get a message), but generally you don't want to see
> it all the time. With us not having a "goo
Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:06 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On 04/20/2009 09:02 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 12:48 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 21:54 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Hey,
I first wrote Makefile.am magic for Pang
On 01/04/2009 05:10 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 17:40 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 23:33 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe that
t
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Jonathon Jongsma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did I miss something that said that this issue only applies if you're using
glade? What about projects that don't use glade and set the page_size
attribute in code?
Nobody s
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 00:36 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 21:53 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] share]$ find . -name *.ui | xargs grep page_size
You should look for glade files too, I guess.
I've run this on my jh
Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 00:33 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Homepage: http://clutter-project.org/
Proposal on d-d-l:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2008-April/msg00184.html
License: LGPLv2 or later (I believe)
Short description:
==
Clutter
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please point the rest of us to the
> > discussion where Imendio/Gossip staff gives their reasons against
> > LGPL.
>
> Google is your friend :)
>
> This was partly discussed on IRC with Xavier IIRC and also covered
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Hubert Figuiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 17:33 +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
>
> > Xavier, it is _your_ job, to get this right from the beginning,
> > everything else is a copyright violation. You can't simply move the
> > burden to ot
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lundi 24 mars 2008, à 00:47 +0100, Torsten Schoenfeld a écrit :
>
> > On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 00:47 +0200, Lucas Rocha wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.gnome.org/start/schedule-unstable.ics
> > >
> > > Let me know if you fin
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 01:04 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Jonathon Jongsma
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/18/08, Felipe Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm a GNOME user and FOSS developer that wo
On 3/18/08, Felipe Contreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a GNOME user and FOSS developer that would like to know which are
> the features users want. Knowing that is a step closer into making a
> consequential contribution.
>
> Now I know d-d-l is not the right place for that, neither is th
On 1/18/08, Joe Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Jan 18, 2008 3:49 AM, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Currently project information is spread thoughout various systems. The
> > maintainers are available in MAINTAINERS files, developers in AUTHORS,
> > the description is pos
On 11/9/07, Lucas Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't want to comment about any specific build system. I have a
> couple of more fundamental questions about this topic though:
>
> - What's the *problem* that needs to be solved that really demands us
> to choose another build system?
I thin
On 9/11/07, Adam Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hrm. I'm not sure that this statement ("_very_ strong general opinion")
> > is true. Some people feel this is the way to go, and some are pushing
> > very hard for this, but there are als
On 8/24/07, Willie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Ever since we moved to SVN, I've really been missing the *checkout*
> feature that we used to have with the old web interface to CVS. With
> the *checkout* feature, I was able to maintain documentation in our CVS
> module and just
On 8/8/07, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/07, Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm sure there are other examples. These are just the ones
> > that I knew off the top of my head. Could we please work on
> > creating a syntax that allows us to express all this
On 5/27/07, Grant McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've had a question about locale support from a user of my SSHMenu
> applet. It turns out it's really a question about gnome-terminal's
> locale handling.
>
> Normally, this user works in the pl_PL.UTF-8 locale. Occasionally, he
> n
On 3/17/07, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/17/07, Jonathon Jongsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, right now there is a bit of a mindset in the free
> > software world that if you're a C++ hacker, you belong in KDE, and if
> >
On 3/16/07, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Right now, modules in desktop/admin/devtools suites can use the python
> bindings. We also accept the use of gtk# for proposed modules. However,
> it was never really agreed whether it was okay or not to use our C++
> bindings for GN
On 10/10/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As there is currently no developer tools suite - I am also requesting
> > that one be created - I've spoken to Richard (devhelp) and Naba (anjuta)
> > and they will be willing to be a part of such a release suite - others too
> > have express
On 9/7/06, Havoc Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, there's a reality that HEAD has to always be roughly working since
> lots of people are trying to work with it.
>
> Given that reality, a longer cycle essentially does nothing to make it
> easier to make large changes, because a branch is
On 8/25/06, Maxim Udushlivy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luis Villa wrote:
> > You might want to explain *why* you think that :)
> > Luis
> >
>
> I have my reasons but I think we should start with independent reviews ;)
>
I have not actually used Gideon for a real project but I did download
it a w
On 8/9/06, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 20:59 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
>
> [CCing Josselin; please read the last quoted paragraph :) ]
>
> > On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 18:55 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > > /me starts cheerleading federico on
> > >
> >
sorry, forgot to reply to list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jonathon Jongsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Apr 9, 2006 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [gnome-love] Participate to the GNOME Goals and feel the love!
To: Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 4/9/06, Vincent
On 3/6/06, Davyd Madeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok guys and gals. I am announcing a preliminary draft of the release
> notes for 2.14. We now require proof readers for spelling, grammar and
> technical correctness.
>
In the very first paragraph, change:
"GNOME comprises of both a desktop and
26 matches
Mail list logo
