gcalctool had been branched for 2.22.
The branch name is gnome-2-22.
Future development for GNOME 2.23.X
will continue in SVN trunk.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
It would be really sleek if we came up with a utility that could do this
for Gnome/GTK apps, and I think it would lower the barrier for people to
try to start developing. If we had something that worked like, say:
ghack --python --docs --intl projectname
A few years ago, when I was
gcalctool has been branched for GNOME 2.20.
The branch name is gnome-2-20.
Future work (mostly bug fixes, unless anybody
would like to help with some of the suggested
enhancements) will continue in trunk.
Thanks.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
Jani Monoses has sent me a nice patch for gcalctool. See:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448263
specifically the attachment:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=90082action=view
The patch makes the following changes:
- replace gnome_help_display_desktop() with code from
Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
Why not adapt Gnome versioning... gcalctool 2.19.x and such?
Because version 2.x.y of the [g]calctool source code was about 15-18
years ago.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Hi Elijah,
I've just branched gcalctool (v5.9.14) for GNOME 2.18
Is there any chance we could we get you to make the minor version
number for gcalctool match that of GNOME's (e.g. 5.19.x for the next
unstable cycle)?
Yes. It's funny you should mention that. It's worked so well for Orca that
I've just branched gcalctool (v5.9.14) for GNOME 2.18
svn cp svn+ssh://svn.gnome.org/svn/gcalctool/trunk
svn+ssh://svn.gnome.org/svn/gcalctool/branches/gnome-2-18
Committed revision 1553.
New development, bug fixing etc will go on in SVN trunk/HEAD.
I don't have plans to do much with
I've just branched Orca for GNOME 2.16. The branch is
called gnome-2-16. Future development work and bug fixing
will be done in CVS HEAD.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
I've just branched gcalctool for GNOME 2.16. The branch is
called gnome-2-16. Future development work and bug fixing
will be done in CVS HEAD.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
I am not saying we shouldn't take good ideas etc., from Apple, but lets
try to remember that Apple is basically a failure in the desktop market.
What were you smoking when you wrote this?
___
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Rich Burridge wrote:
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
I am not saying we shouldn't take good ideas etc., from Apple, but lets
try to remember that Apple is basically a failure in the desktop
market.
What were you smoking when you wrote this?
Well
Dan Winship wrote:
Rich Burridge wrote:
I've seen GNOME steadily improve over the last few years, but it still
doesn't have a cohesive wholeness to it. One of the problems in this
respect is that different distros customize GNOME as they see fit.
That's totally backwards. GNOME
Elijah Newren wrote:
It appears that the gcalctool and gdm problems can be fixed by using a
decent shell (i.e. /bin/bash instead of Solaris' sh) though that's an
ongoing conversation in IRC at the moment...
Yup. The current version of intltool in CVS HEAD doesn't play well on
Solaris.
I've just branched gcalctool (the GNOME calculator) for GNOME 2.14.
Branch name is gnome-2-14.
Development (mostly bug fixing) will now resume in CVS HEAD.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
I've just branched gcalctool for GNOME 2.12 (tag gnome-2-12).
Main development will now continue in CVS HEAD.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hi all,
gcalctool has been branched for gnome 2.10. Stable releases should
use the gnome-2-10 branch, while new development will continue on
CVS HEAD.
Thanks.
--
Rich Burridge Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems Inc. (MPK14-260), Phone: +1.650.786.5188
16 matches
Mail list logo
