Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-16 Thread Calum Benson


On 15 Mar 2006, at 19:23, Nigel Tao wrote:


If it's in the bottom right corner of the screen (as it is in
Ubuntu's default setup, for example), it's several thousand pixels
wide and several thousand pixels high, making it the easiest thing
to drag to in the whole of Gnome.


Except when, like me, you want panel hide arrows turned on :)


In which case, you stick it in almost the corner, and it's still very
easy to hit - slam the mouse into the corner, and then just the
slightest flick of the wrist in the opposite direction.  Two
movements, both fast according to Fitts - the first one has a
superlarge target area, the second one is a short distance.


Well, they're both fast if you're not holding down a mouse button  
at the time, but there's an extra level of muscle control required  
when you are, which makes the direction change that bit more tricky.   
And actually, in practice, short distances can be made more difficult  
than long ones by the realities of mouse mechanics... e.g. when your  
desk has grit (or crumbs!) on it that throw the rollers off a bit, or  
you have one of those old optical mice that suffers from pointer  
wobble or needs to be always aligned with its shiny mat's X-Y axes  
for it to go exactly where you intended.  So it's never all quite as  
straightforward as Fitts would have us believe :)


Cheeri,
Calum.

--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer   Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Java Desktop System Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771

Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-16 Thread Nigel Tao
 I also have such a monitor and one thing I've been missing is a way to
 mouse click on the window switcher. I also have a window switcher
 button on my mouse, the MX1000. I would be nice if this button
 activated the window switcher where the mouse was and would then let
 me click on the application icon instead of going all the way to the
 menu and clicking on an icon there.

It pops up in the middle of the screen, rather than where the mouse
is, but you might want to check out superswitcher.  Currently, it
binds to the Super key, but you could possibly bind your fancy mouse
button to that, too.
http://www.gnomefiles.org/app.php?soft_id=1231

screenshot:
http://blogs.gnome.org/attachment/nigeltao/2006/01/02/1/superswitcher.png

It also does a lot more, such as find-as-you-type search for windows,
and keyboard shortcuts for add/remove workspaces.

Nigel.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Mike Douglas
The desktop almost always obstructed by the applications run by a
user, why should a user have to minimize 5 or 6 windows to play a
song, or open a text document? This ruins the workflow of the user.

Personally, I think that the desktop belongs in the age when operating
systems couldn't multitask adequately. A great example of this would
be the trash can. Unless you were lucky enough to have only one
nautilus window open, deleting was the job of the context menu. The
trash applet was a great step forward for usability, don't let it
regress now.

--
Mike
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Who
On 3/14/06, TRANS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi. I'm new to the list. I have had this idea in the back of my mind
 for a while and I thought it was about time I share it and see what
 others think.

 I point out that this is in consideration of how GNU/Linux via Gnome
 can differentiate and innovate beyond the other options out there.

 My idea is this. I would really like it if my Desktop actually were
 the File Browser. In other words instead of having a seperate Desktop/
 directory in my home directory, the desktop could actually reflect my
 home directory (or any other defaut directory I tell it too for that
 matter), but more that this, to be able to navigate thru the file
 heirarchy like one normally does with Nautilus, but without the need
 for a seperate window. An optional split pane mode would also be
 useful in this design (like MC). And if you want to go a step further,
 some cool transition effects between directory changes ;-)

 To me this would be a much more natural way of working with my system.
 Just by hitting the Desktop icon on my toolbar, up pops file
 naviagtion (is there a shorcut key sequence for that btw?).
 Application windows reside on top of all that, making it qucik and
 easy to go back and forth. Plus workspaces would then each have their
 on independent current directory. I think that would make workspaces
 more intuitive and useful too.

 What do others think?

 Trans.

I have been thinking about this for a while too,

I think it is a great idea - I like that by using the 'Show Desktop'
toogle/applet a user could get to some file, and then return the
desktop to the way it was before the looked for the file

The best place to see this working is on a PSION series 5 (maybe
later, I only have a 5) - it is still the most productive environment
I have ever used - and I liked the way the desktop was the file
manager.

If it was implemented, I think it would be essential that there was a
very quick way to get back to the 'original desktop' - I.E the
~/Desktop folder.

Given that we currently use Nautilus for the desktop, it is not much
hacking to include at least a Gconf key to enable users to browse
using their desktop?

I may do some mockups, if people are interested...

Who
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Calum Benson


On 15 Mar 2006, at 09:55, Mike Douglas wrote:


The trash applet was a great step forward for usability


I'd somewhat dispute that, personally... no matter where on my panels  
I put the darn thing, nine times out of ten, it couldn't be further  
away from the thing I'm trying to delete if it tried, and dragging  
things that far is a royal pain.  (That doesn't make it any worse  
than the desktop trashcan, certainly... just not notably better IMHO.)


Cheeri,
Calum.

--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer   Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Java Desktop System Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771

Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems


___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On 3/14/06, TRANS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 My idea is this. I would really like it if my Desktop actually were
 the File Browser. In other words instead of having a seperate Desktop/
 directory in my home directory, the desktop could actually reflect my
 home directory (or any other defaut directory I tell it too for that
 matter), but more that this, to be able to navigate thru the file
 heirarchy like one normally does with Nautilus

Execpt if you use the default mode, which is spatial and with which
the desktop already behaves like just another window ;)

--
Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas

On Mar 15, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Calum Benson wrote:


On 15 Mar 2006, at 09:55, Mike Douglas wrote:


The trash applet was a great step forward for usability


I'd somewhat dispute that, personally... no matter where on my panels 
I put the darn thing, nine times out of ten, it couldn't be further 
away from the thing I'm trying to delete if it tried, and dragging 
things that far is a royal pain.  (That doesn't make it any worse than 
the desktop trashcan, certainly... just not notably better IMHO.)

...


If it's in the bottom right corner of the screen (as it is in Ubuntu's 
default setup, for example), it's several thousand pixels wide and 
several thousand pixels high, making it the easiest thing to drag to in 
the whole of Gnome.


If you can't easily drag from one side of the screen to the other, 
there's something wrong with your mouse acceleration settings.


--
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/

___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 13:52, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
 If it's in the bottom right corner of the screen (as it is in Ubuntu's 
 default setup, for example), it's several thousand pixels wide and 
 several thousand pixels high, making it the easiest thing to drag to in 
 the whole of Gnome.
 
 If you can't easily drag from one side of the screen to the other, 
 there's something wrong with your mouse acceleration settings.

I have recently acquired a 24 screen and I must say things are not so
simple. Fitt's law works for small screens, but not for big ones. Of
course you could have a big acceleration factor to be able to cross the
screen in one hand movement, but then you can't use your mouse anymore
to draw something with the Gimp (and big screen users are often
graphists).

Xav


___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Calum Benson


On 15 Mar 2006, at 12:52, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:


On Mar 15, 2006, at 11:58 AM, Calum Benson wrote:


On 15 Mar 2006, at 09:55, Mike Douglas wrote:


The trash applet was a great step forward for usability


I'd somewhat dispute that, personally... no matter where on my  
panels I put the darn thing, nine times out of ten, it couldn't be  
further away from the thing I'm trying to delete if it tried, and  
dragging things that far is a royal pain.  (That doesn't make it  
any worse than the desktop trashcan, certainly... just not notably  
better IMHO.)

...


If it's in the bottom right corner of the screen (as it is in  
Ubuntu's default setup, for example), it's several thousand pixels  
wide and several thousand pixels high, making it the easiest thing  
to drag to in the whole of Gnome.


Except when, like me, you want panel hide arrows turned on :)

If you can't easily drag from one side of the screen to the other,  
there's something wrong with your mouse acceleration settings.


Not wrong, I just haven't found any settings to my taste that allow  
me to do it.  I've always hated anything that significantly speeds up  
my pointer the further I move it, so I prefer to stick with as near a  
linear correlation as I can get away with... which, with a big  
monitor and not much desk space, usually means a couple of movements  
to traverse the desktop.


(I just press Ctrl+T or Delete to trash files anyway, so I should add  
that it's not a big deal whether any sort of Trash icon or applet  
works well for me... except that if it doesn't, it probably doesn't  
work well for some other percentage of our users either, who may or  
may not want to use it any more than I do.)


Cheeri,
Calum.

--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer   Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Java Desktop System Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771

Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems


___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On 3/15/06, Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 13:52, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
  If it's in the bottom right corner of the screen (as it is in Ubuntu's
  default setup, for example), it's several thousand pixels wide and
  several thousand pixels high, making it the easiest thing to drag to in
  the whole of Gnome.
 
  If you can't easily drag from one side of the screen to the other,
  there's something wrong with your mouse acceleration settings.

 I have recently acquired a 24 screen and I must say things are not so
 simple. Fitt's law works for small screens, but not for big ones.

nitpick
You probably mean this application of Fitt's law here. Fitt's law is
not about corners, it's about distance and size of target. In this
case the distance becomes too large to be practically obtainable but
that's more a flaw in your pointing device than in the actual law...
/nitpick

But of course it's not as beneficial on huge screens due to the
restrictions of the pointing device.

--
Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Pat Suwalski

Who wrote:

Given that we currently use Nautilus for the desktop, it is not much
hacking to include at least a Gconf key to enable users to browse
using their desktop?


It breaks the analogy of the desktop being (mostly) static. Anything 
activated from the desktop goes in a new window, though the state of the 
desktop can be moved around.


Having live content on the desktop necessitates more widgets and more 
complication.


--Pat
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Dan Winship
Kalle Vahlman wrote:
 On 3/15/06, Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have recently acquired a 24 screen and I must say things are not so
 simple. Fitt's law works for small screens, but not for big ones.
 
 nitpick
 You probably mean this application of Fitt's law here. Fitt's law is
 not about corners, it's about distance and size of target.

nitpickier
You mean Fitts' Law, not Fitt's Law. :-)
/nitpickier

But yeah, we should call the edges-and-corners thing Tog's Law.

 But of course it's not as beneficial on huge screens due to the
 restrictions of the pointing device.

Yeah.

1. Tog's Law assumes that you have enough mousing space (given the
   speed and acceleration settings that are reasonable for small-
   scale use on your screen). This fails if you have a huge monitor
   and lack a correspondingly huge mousing area, eg, because your
   physical desktop is cluttered, or because you use a keyboard and
   mouse tray for ergonomic reasons, and it only has a limited
   amount of space for mousing in.

2. It also assumes that you're using an input device that behaves
   like a mouse. Touchpads are mostly similar enough (at least on
   laptop-sized monitors), but the Thinkpad joystick thingy is
   sufficiently different to make the edges of the screen feel much
   farther away.

3. For that matter, it assumes the user *realizes* that the input
   device has acceleration, which some (many?) users don't
   (especially with touchpads).

4. It's easy to get to the edge of the screen, but it's hard to
   get back where you were before. This isn't that big a deal on a
   512x384 original Mac screen, but it is on modern screens. (In
   fact, given that Fitts' Law has a precise mathematical
   formulation, you could calculate the exact monitor size at which
   the Mac-style global menubar becomes less efficient on average
   than Gtk-style per-window menubars. Of course the standard
   Windows model where you maximize every window, but have the
   menubar below the titlebar model manages to capture the worst of
   both worlds.)

-- Dan
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Kalle Vahlman
On 3/15/06, Dan Winship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Kalle Vahlman wrote:
  On 3/15/06, Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I have recently acquired a 24 screen and I must say things are not so
  simple. Fitt's law works for small screens, but not for big ones.
 
  nitpick
  You probably mean this application of Fitt's law here. Fitt's law is
  not about corners, it's about distance and size of target.

 nitpickier
 You mean Fitts' Law, not Fitt's Law. :-)
 /nitpickier

Oooh, you have out-nitpicked me!

I humbly bow in acknowledgment of your superior nitpickiness.

;)

(the rest, couldn't agree more)

--
Kalle Vahlman, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Alan Horkan

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Who wrote:

 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:42:22 +
 From: Who [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
 Subject: Re: Desktop as Nautilus

 On 3/14/06, TRANS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[...]

  My idea is this. I would really like it if my Desktop actually were
  the File Browser. In other words instead of having a seperate Desktop/
  directory in my home directory, the desktop could actually reflect my
  home directory (or any other defaut directory I tell it too for that
  matter), but more that this, to be able to navigate thru the file
  heirarchy like one normally does with Nautilus, but without the need
  for a seperate window.

 The best place to see this working is on a PSION series 5 (maybe
 later, I only have a 5) - it is still the most productive environment
 I have ever used - and I liked the way the desktop was the file
 manager.

It isn't entirely clear what you mean but if I understand you correctly
you could achieve something similar by running Matchbox on your desktop
instead of Metacity (which have done before to try it out and I kind of
liked it).  Matchbox takes the main menu and displays it on the
desk.

http://projects.o-hand.com/matchbox/
http://projects.o-hand.com/matchbox/screenshots.html
http://projects.o-hand.com/matchbox/screenshots/ss-pango.png
http://projects.o-hand.com/matchbox/screenshots/mediabox/base.png

Hope that helps



Sincerely

Alan Horkan

Inkscape http://inkscape.org
Abiword http://www.abisource.com
Open Clip Art http://OpenClipArt.org

Alan's Diary http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/



___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Who
On 3/15/06, Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Who wrote:

  Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:42:22 +
  From: Who [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
  Subject: Re: Desktop as Nautilus
 
  On 3/14/06, TRANS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 [...]

   My idea is this. I would really like it if my Desktop actually were
   the File Browser. In other words instead of having a seperate Desktop/
   directory in my home directory, the desktop could actually reflect my
   home directory (or any other defaut directory I tell it too for that
   matter), but more that this, to be able to navigate thru the file
   heirarchy like one normally does with Nautilus, but without the need
   for a seperate window.

  The best place to see this working is on a PSION series 5 (maybe
  later, I only have a 5) - it is still the most productive environment
  I have ever used - and I liked the way the desktop was the file
  manager.

 It isn't entirely clear what you mean but if I understand you correctly
 you could achieve something similar by running Matchbox on your desktop
 instead of Metacity (which have done before to try it out and I kind of
 liked it).  Matchbox takes the main menu and displays it on the
 desk.

 http://projects.o-hand.com/matchbox/
 http://projects.o-hand.com/matchbox/screenshots.html
 http://projects.o-hand.com/matchbox/screenshots/ss-pango.png
 http://projects.o-hand.com/matchbox/screenshots/mediabox/base.png

 Hope that helps


Thanks!

I am not on Linux now, but if matchbox-desktop could be run alone then
it seems to be exactly what _I_ was talking about  - not sure about
the OP. I will experiment this evening

Who
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Nigel Tao
  If it's in the bottom right corner of the screen (as it is in
  Ubuntu's default setup, for example), it's several thousand pixels
  wide and several thousand pixels high, making it the easiest thing
  to drag to in the whole of Gnome.

 Except when, like me, you want panel hide arrows turned on :)

In which case, you stick it in almost the corner, and it's still very
easy to hit - slam the mouse into the corner, and then just the
slightest flick of the wrist in the opposite direction.  Two
movements, both fast according to Fitts - the first one has a
superlarge target area, the second one is a short distance.

Nigel.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Ross Burton
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 17:26 +, Alan Horkan wrote:
 It isn't entirely clear what you mean but if I understand you correctly
 you could achieve something similar by running Matchbox on your desktop
 instead of Metacity (which have done before to try it out and I kind of
 liked it).  Matchbox takes the main menu and displays it on the
 desk.

Not strictly true.  Matchbox handles normal top-level windows
differently to most window managers by forcing their size to fill the
screen.  It handles dialogs, desktops, panels, and so on as expected so
the end result would be that nautilus takes the desktop as expected and
double-clicking on a folder on the desktop would then open a new
full-screen window for that folder, that wouldn't have any magical
desktop-like properties.

Ross
-- 
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www: http://www.burtonini.com./
 PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-15 Thread Esben Stien
TRANS [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I would really like it if my Desktop actually were the File Browser.

I think this is a horrible idea and deviates much from the nautilus
and gnome philosophy, in my opinion;). The desktop, as far as I see it
should not contain anything, ideally, only a first person view into an
interactive 3d world;). Some hot cairo graphics is a resonable first
step;).

 hitting the Desktop icon on my toolbar

People should be hitting the icon of the directory they want or an
open nautilus window and the go to the directory they want, in my
opinion, as it is now. The clear desktop button should have no use. 

 workspaces 

I also find workspaces extremely non productive. You shouldn't need
more than one, in my opinion. 

-- 
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s  a 
 http://www. s tn m
  irc://irc.  b  -  i  .   e/%23contact
  [sip|iax]:   e e 
   jid:b0ef@n n
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-14 Thread TRANS
Hi. I'm new to the list. I have had this idea in the back of my mind
for a while and I thought it was about time I share it and see what
others think.

I point out that this is in consideration of how GNU/Linux via Gnome
can differentiate and innovate beyond the other options out there.

My idea is this. I would really like it if my Desktop actually were
the File Browser. In other words instead of having a seperate Desktop/
directory in my home directory, the desktop could actually reflect my
home directory (or any other defaut directory I tell it too for that
matter), but more that this, to be able to navigate thru the file
heirarchy like one normally does with Nautilus, but without the need
for a seperate window. An optional split pane mode would also be
useful in this design (like MC). And if you want to go a step further,
some cool transition effects between directory changes ;-)

To me this would be a much more natural way of working with my system.
Just by hitting the Desktop icon on my toolbar, up pops file
naviagtion (is there a shorcut key sequence for that btw?).
Application windows reside on top of all that, making it qucik and
easy to go back and forth. Plus workspaces would then each have their
on independent current directory. I think that would make workspaces
more intuitive and useful too.

What do others think?

Trans.

(P.S. I assume this is the right mialing list for this. Please correct
me if I'm wrong about that.)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list


Re: Desktop as Nautilus

2006-03-14 Thread Pat Suwalski

Your ideas are interesting:

TRANS wrote:

My idea is this. I would really like it if my Desktop actually were
the File Browser. In other words instead of having a seperate Desktop/
directory in my home directory, the desktop could actually reflect my
home directory (or any other defaut directory I tell it too for that
matter), but more that this, to be able to navigate thru the file
heirarchy like one normally does with Nautilus, but without the need
for a seperate window. An optional split pane mode would also be
useful in this design (like MC). And if you want to go a step further,
some cool transition effects between directory changes ;-)


Having desktop-as-home is actually a Nautilus option already, though the 
people who wrote it do not support it. I use it, because like you, I 
think it's a very natural approach to where things are.


See the gconf key:

/apps/nautilus/preferences/desktop_is_home_dir (bool)

As to actually making it a browsable interface, I'm not sure I can 
visualize how that would work. Most people are not fans of live 
desktops, like what Microsoft tried back in 1996.


I think it is generally believed that it makes sense to do a fundamental 
task like browsing folders in a window that does not get covered by 
other windows.



To me this would be a much more natural way of working with my system.
Just by hitting the Desktop icon on my toolbar, up pops file


Is this so much different than hitting the Nautilus browse launcher icon?

--Pat
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list