The GNOME mailserver contains various [EMAIL PROTECTED] aliases.
These are aliases to various mailing lists. For instance:
$ cat gedit-maint
maggi AT athena polito it
$ cat gnome-panel-maint
These files were last generated on Jan 2005. I can't find the script
used to create these aliases
Hi Olav,
Olav Vitters wrote:
The GNOME mailserver contains various [EMAIL PROTECTED] aliases.
...
Does anyone make use of these maint aliases? They are somewhat
incomplete. E.g. there is a glib-maint, but I couldn't find a gtk+-maint
file. Further, I don't advise anyone to use
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Olav Vitters wrote:
The GNOME mailserver contains various [EMAIL PROTECTED] aliases.
...
Does anyone make use of these maint aliases? They are somewhat
incomplete. E.g. there is a glib-maint, but I couldn't find a gtk+-maint
free and open-source fonts,
feel free to pop by ##fonts on Freenode.
Feel free to forward this announcement to other relevant lists.
Thanks,
Simos
___
Openfontlibrary mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 08:49:28PM +0100, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to announce an IRC meeting that will take place tomorrow
Friday, 14th July 2006, at 20:00 GMT, at #freedesktop on Freenode (IRC).
Hi all,
I'm currently on holiday and think I won't make it; just wanted
quote who=Simos Xenitellis
I would like to announce an IRC meeting that will take place tomorrow
Friday, 14th July 2006, at 20:00 GMT, at #freedesktop on Freenode (IRC).
Simos,
Just wanted to say thanks for your cross-silo outreach efforts, it's badly
needed, and you're doing a great job
On 9/13/05, Benjamin Kahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Havoc,
For some reason, this sounds suspiciously like a semi-moderated list
to me. Known contributors could post without moderation, but others have
posting access only if the moderator approves the message. Contributer
only lists
Havoc,
For some reason, this sounds suspiciously like a semi-moderated list to
me. Known contributors could post without moderation, but others have
posting access only if the moderator approves the message. Contributer
only lists suck (IMO) because the whole point is to allow outside
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 21:08 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
It doesn't exist. I think a metacity-list would be really really
useful. Pretty please? :)
Useful for what? ;-) ... all the doing work kind of discussions seem
to be adequately handled by bugzilla. And I can certainly imagine a
On 9/11/05, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't exist. I think a metacity-list would be really really
useful. Pretty please? :)
As Havoc, said, I think the big question is finding out what problems
this would address or what new advantages it would bring. I believe
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 09:35 -0700, Rob Adams wrote:
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 17:14 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
For discussing long-standing issues with Metacity. Like the
focus-stealing problems, the placement algorithm or the (ugh!)
minimize animation. :) And for asking things like how
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 13:34 -0400, Owen Williams wrote:
Bugzilla is a good thing, but not if the maintainers seemingly ignore
it. The solution may not be a new mailing list, but simply an increased
level of responsiveness on bugzilla. I don't expect maintainers to
chime in on every
It doesn't exist. I think a metacity-list would be really really
useful. Pretty please? :)
--
mvh Björn
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 21:08 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
It doesn't exist. I think a metacity-list would be really really
useful. Pretty please? :)
Useful for what? ;-) ... all the doing work kind of discussions seem
to be adequately handled by bugzilla. And I can certainly imagine a lot
of
On 9/11/05, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't exist. I think a metacity-list would be really really
useful. Pretty please? :)
As Havoc, said, I think the big question is finding out what problems
this would address or what new advantages it would bring. I believe
there may
On 9/11/05, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there are topics that really need a list, they are on topic for
desktop-devel-list, usability list, and other gnome lists. I don't think
we need a metacity list until the metacity-specific content becomes a
significant amount of traffic
16 matches
Mail list logo
