On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 16:59 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 15:35 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:06 +0200, Erwann Chenede wrote:
> > > Hi Luis,
> >
> > > The functionality (for custom keybindings) was added the 2002-05-22 in
> > > gnome-settings-daemo
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 15:35 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:06 +0200, Erwann Chenede wrote:
> > Hi Luis,
>
> > The functionality (for custom keybindings) was added the 2002-05-22 in
> > gnome-settings-daemon.
> > If anybody is interested by the UI in JDS 3 you can find a s
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:06 +0200, Erwann Chenede wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> The functionality (for custom keybindings) was added the 2002-05-22 in
> gnome-settings-daemon.
> If anybody is interested by the UI in JDS 3 you can find a screenshot here :
> http://www.gnome.org/~erwannc/jds-custom-binding.p
Le jeudi 30 juin 2005 à 19:02 -0400, Luis Villa a écrit :
> > Hasn't Sebastien Bacher taken Jonathan's place in the g-c-c maintainers?
>
> News to me. :) Seb?
hum ... I do some work on it and roll the tarballs ... but there is some
room for several maintainers on it, let's say I'm one of them :)
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 13:08 -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
> So what do I tell Tomboy users who complain that its global keybindings
> don't work from the myriad other WMs out there?
>
> At least when I do the X keybinding myself it "mostly works" from
> everywhere.
>
I guess I'm saying "for desk
So what do I tell Tomboy users who complain that its global keybindings
don't work from the myriad other WMs out there?
At least when I do the X keybinding myself it "mostly works" from
everywhere.
-Alex
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 17:23 +0200, Erwann Chenede wrote:
3)
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 17:23 +0200, Erwann Chenede wrote:
> 3) get ride of one of the implementation of the custom keybindings
> feature (either in g-s-d or metacity).
>
> 4) integrate all keybindings in one place. This would be a bit more
> complex to get the architecture right.
My view is that
Hi Havoc,
Havoc Pennington wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 11:07 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Popping heads up on this tread again- Jonathan, Jody, what will it
take to get this patch in for 2.12?
It looks like this patch is adding global keybinding stuff to g-s-d, but
we already put it in
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 11:07 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> Popping heads up on this tread again- Jonathan, Jody, what will it
> take to get this patch in for 2.12?
>
It looks like this patch is adding global keybinding stuff to g-s-d, but
we already put it in metacity instead, so we'd only want the U
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 11:07 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> Popping heads up on this tread again- Jonathan, Jody, what will it
> take to get this patch in for 2.12?
Hasn't Sebastien Bacher taken Jonathan's place in the g-c-c maintainers?
---
Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Surviving Bill Clinton w
Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Popping heads up on this tread again- Jonathan, Jody, what will it
> take to get this patch in for 2.12?
A maintainer.
-Jonathan
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome
On 6/30/05, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 11:07 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > Popping heads up on this tread again- Jonathan, Jody, what will it
> > take to get this patch in for 2.12?
>
> Hasn't Sebastien Bacher taken Jonathan's place in the g-c-c maintainers?
Popping heads up on this tread again- Jonathan, Jody, what will it
take to get this patch in for 2.12?
On 6/17/05, Erwann Chenede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The functionality (for custom keybindings) was added the 2002-05-22 in
> gnome-settings-daemon.
> If anybody is interested by the UI in JDS
Hi Luis,
Luis Villa wrote:
On 6/16/05, Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16 Jun 2005, at 12:47, Luis Villa wrote:
If someone could *finally* wrap that in a GUI (ideally, I guess, as
part of the existing keybinding dialog) that would be a nice 2.12
feature.
Well, we s
Alex Graveley wrote:
>
> Well, we can enforce no conflicts without going through a third party,
> right? The UI enforces no conflicts, and the library checks that a
> keybinding is not already taken at bind time (allowing the app to
> prompt the user if it is).
>
> It isn't as though a third part
Well, we can enforce no conflicts without going through a third party,
right? The UI enforces no conflicts, and the library checks that a
keybinding is not already taken at bind time (allowing the app to prompt
the user if it is).
It isn't as though a third party gives any better form of co
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 11:57 -0700, Alex Graveley wrote:
> I think the global binding problem can be solved by just designating a
> GConf path that apps install a keybinding action into. Then create a
> library with tomboykeybinder.c that apps call into with the GConf paths
> they are intereste
Hi,
So my initial keybinding implementation tried to use metacity's command
GConf keys. It's really gross in practice, since every time at startup
I had to iterate the keys and determine if the default bindings exist,
and re-add them if not. Also, the number of commands is bounded.
I don't
On 6/16/05, Calum Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 16 Jun 2005, at 12:47, Luis Villa wrote:
>
> > If someone could *finally* wrap that in a GUI (ideally, I guess, as
> > part of the existing keybinding dialog) that would be a nice 2.12
> > feature.
>
> Well, we still do this in JDS... I
On 16 Jun 2005, at 12:47, Luis Villa wrote:
If someone could *finally* wrap that in a GUI (ideally, I guess, as
part of the existing keybinding dialog) that would be a nice 2.12
feature.
Well, we still do this in JDS... I know the original patch for GNOME
2.0 was rejected (although I can't
On 6/16/05, Nigel Tao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Graveley wrote:
> > I think it is a bad idea to make the global keybinding more
> > accessible to apps... really there should be a central API that
> > integrates with GConf to store keys sequences and command actions
> > which integrates with
Alex Graveley wrote:
> I think it is a bad idea to make the global keybinding more
> accessible to apps... really there should be a central API that
> integrates with GConf to store keys sequences and command actions
> which integrates with gnome-keybinding-properties (which has a
> static action l
Hi Nigel,
Once you handle the global keypress you can do whatever you want.
Tomboy also has a keybinding (Alt-F12 by default) that presents the
applet's note menu.
There is already a dependency on libegg: tomboykeybinder.c already
relies on eggaccelerators.c.
I think it is a bad idea to m
23 matches
Mail list logo
