On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 21:34 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:17 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 23:18 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
Hi List
Applications like Rhythmbox and Totem have content handling capabilities
that are dependent on GStreamer.
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 10:04 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 21:34 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
The only difference between this and what I suggested is that you are
giving an explicit path to a script (what I was calling a handler) to
be run. It's the same idea.
OK, I
On 15.08.2007 00:18, Alex Jones wrote:
Applications like Rhythmbox and Totem have content handling capabilities
that are dependent on GStreamer. Currently, they have to hardcode a list
of MIME types in their Desktop Entries, which sucks a bit.
So how about we try something like I've sketched
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 23:18 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
Hi List
Applications like Rhythmbox and Totem have content handling capabilities
that are dependent on GStreamer. Currently, they have to hardcode a list
of MIME types in their Desktop Entries, which sucks a bit.
So how about we try
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 14:17 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 23:18 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
Hi List
Applications like Rhythmbox and Totem have content handling capabilities
that are dependent on GStreamer. Currently, they have to hardcode a list
of MIME types in their
Hi List
Applications like Rhythmbox and Totem have content handling capabilities
that are dependent on GStreamer. Currently, they have to hardcode a list
of MIME types in their Desktop Entries, which sucks a bit.
So how about we try something like I've sketched up in the attached
diagram.
