Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-05-02 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sat, 2017-04-29 at 12:06 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Bastien Nocera   > wrote: > > Are you saying you reverted jhbuild module changes, without > > notifying > > the committer, because there's a problem with the grilo/grilo- > >

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-05-01 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:34:03AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 28 April 2017 at 01:00, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > I will, but I'll keep the two parallel for at least a release or two. > > I tried doing this in my projects last cycle and was a bit of a > disaster.

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-29 Thread mcatanzaro
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: Are you saying you reverted jhbuild module changes, without notifying the committer, because there's a problem with the grilo/grilo-plugins handling, I did notify the committer (Javier). but you didn't file a bug

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-29 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 10:19 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Bastien Nocera   > wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 00:37 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > > >  On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Peter Hutterer > > >  

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-28 Thread mcatanzaro
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 00:37 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > I will, but I'll keep the two parallel for at least a release or >

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-28 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 00:37 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Peter Hutterer  > wrote: > > I will, but I'll keep the two parallel for at least a release or > > two.  > > If you > > need me to add anything specific to keep continuous

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-28 Thread Richard Hughes
On 28 April 2017 at 01:00, Peter Hutterer wrote: > I will, but I'll keep the two parallel for at least a release or two. I tried doing this in my projects last cycle and was a bit of a disaster. Pretty much any committer that added files or changed how the project was

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-27 Thread mcatanzaro
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: I will, but I'll keep the two parallel for at least a release or two. If you need me to add anything specific to keep continuous happy for the time being, let me know. Cheers, Peter Here's a request for

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-27 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 03:24:24PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Replying to both Michael's and Iain at the same time, to reduce the > amount of email. > > On 27 April 2017 at 15:04, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Iain Lane

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-27 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: I'd be happier, though, if maintainers that are planning to drop autotools also dropped me a line so that I don't wake up to a string of failed builds and then have to figure out whether or not this was a planned break,

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-27 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
Replying to both Michael's and Iain at the same time, to reduce the amount of email. On 27 April 2017 at 15:04, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Iain Lane wrote: >> >> As it happens I interacted with this script (in

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-27 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Iain Lane wrote: As it happens I interacted with this script (in gnome-software) yesterday. I hadn't got a new enough jhbuild - the one I had was trying to call ./configure instead of meson directly. The script AFAICS ignores unknown

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-27 Thread Iain Lane
Hiya, Apologies for any ignorance about the scope and intent of the build API. On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:45:04AM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Hi everyone; > A simple script is available here[2], and it has nice properties, like > being able to work with a simple: > > ./configure > make

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-27 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
ld-API? > > Carlos Soriano > > Original Message ---- > Subject: For projects switching to Meson *only* > Local Time: 27 April 2017 10:45 AM > UTC Time: 27 April 2017 08:45 > From: eba...@gmail.com > To: Desktop Development List <desktop-devel-list@gnome.

Re: For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-27 Thread Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-list
Hello Emmanuele, Would be fine if the maintainer does the patch for continuous instead of doing the build-API? Carlos Soriano Original Message Subject: For projects switching to Meson *only* Local Time: 27 April 2017 10:45 AM UTC Time: 27 April 2017 08:45 From: eba

For projects switching to Meson *only*

2017-04-27 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
Hi everyone; since maintainers have started switching to Meson for the development cycle (awesome!) I'd like to ask for a favour: if you're dropping autotools entirely, could you please add a `configure` wrapper script that conforms to the build-api[1] that GNOME Continuous uses? A simple script