Re: GNOME 2.19.4 Released!

2007-07-06 Thread Claude Paroz
On 7/5/07, Xavier Bestel xavier bestel free fr wrote: Hi Elijah, Le mercredi 04 juillet 2007 à 15:53 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : platform - http://download.gnome.org/platform/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS desktop -

Re: GNOME 2.19.4 Released!

2007-07-05 Thread Xavier Bestel
Hi Elijah, Le mercredi 04 juillet 2007 à 15:53 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : platform - http://download.gnome.org/platform/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS desktop - http://download.gnome.org/desktop/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS admin- http://download.gnome.org/admin/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS bindings -

Re: GNOME 2.19.4 Released!

2007-07-05 Thread Elijah Newren
On 7/5/07, Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Elijah, Le mercredi 04 juillet 2007 à 15:53 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : platform - http://download.gnome.org/platform/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS desktop - http://download.gnome.org/desktop/2.19/2.19.4/NEWS admin-

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Johan Dahlin
Joseph Sacco wrote: The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would expect the development branchof pygtk to adapt. I'm ready to adapt but only if the general consent is that API changes are okay. My personal opinion is that the API shouldn't be allowed to change,

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
On Qui, 2007-06-21 at 23:39 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote: Joseph Sacco wrote: The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would expect the development branchof pygtk to adapt. I'm ready to adapt but only if the general consent is that API changes are okay. My

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Ghee Teo
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: On Qui, 2007-06-21 at 23:39 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote: Joseph Sacco wrote: The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would expect the development branchof pygtk to adapt. I'm ready to adapt but only if the general

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Murray Cumming
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 13:58 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: On Qui, 2007-06-21 at 23:39 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote: Joseph Sacco wrote: The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would expect the development branchof pygtk to adapt. I'm ready to adapt

Re: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-22 Thread Owen Taylor
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 15:36 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 13:58 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: On Qui, 2007-06-21 at 23:39 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote: Joseph Sacco wrote: The currently available version of pygtk is the stable branch. I would expect the

gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)

2007-06-21 Thread Elijah Newren
Hi, As noted in bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449318, there was a recent gtk+ API change. jdahlin just barely told me that the changed API has existed since 1998, long before gtk+-2.11.x (and pointed me to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447214). This API change breaks