I have just released GLib 2.25.2 and GConf 2.31.2. These release
contain the accumulated bug-fixes that came out of the early adoption
after my .1 releases earlier this week. Overall, things should be
pretty solid now, so if you hesitated to jump last time, now is an
even better time.
Some
В Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:52:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen написа:
- There is now an AM_GSETTINGS autoconf macro similar to
AM_GCONF_SOURCE_2
This is a good opportunity to stop abusing Automake's macro namespace,
which unfortunately many GNOME-related macros have been doing for years.
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:54 +, Yavor Doganov wrote:
В Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:52:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen написа:
- There is now an AM_GSETTINGS autoconf macro similar to
AM_GCONF_SOURCE_2
This is a good opportunity to stop abusing Automake's macro namespace,
which unfortunately many
В Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:23:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera написа:
This is a good opportunity to stop abusing Automake's macro namespace,
What do you recommend replacing it with?
GLIB_GSETTINGS seems natural, as the glib package is the owner of the
macro. (You can use AU_DEFUN to facilitate
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 06:52 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I have just released GLib 2.25.2 and GConf 2.31.2. These release
contain the accumulated bug-fixes that came out of the early adoption
after my .1 releases earlier this week. Overall, things should be
pretty solid now, so if you
On 04/23/2010 07:54 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
В Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:52:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen написа:
- There is now an AM_GSETTINGS autoconf macro similar to
AM_GCONF_SOURCE_2
This is a good opportunity to stop abusing Automake's macro namespace,
which unfortunately many GNOME-related
2010/4/23 Yavor Doganov ya...@gnu.org:
В Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:23:56 +0100, Bastien Nocera написа:
This is a good opportunity to stop abusing Automake's macro namespace,
What do you recommend replacing it with?
GLIB_GSETTINGS seems natural, as the glib package is the owner of the
macro.