On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:44:41AM +0100, Lasse Schuirmann wrote:
> Shouldn't this be like totally easy with GNU Indent or so? You'll have
> to give it the right CLI args. (We have a wrapper for that in coala if
> you're interested in doing loads of other stuff but indent is usually
> already
> Ok, thanks, I can look at clang-format if it supports the GNOME/GTK+
> convention for formatting function prototypes in a header.
>
> Otherwise I can write a new script, and re-use some code from
> lineup-parameters:
> https://github.com/swilmet/gnome-c-utils
> (it's based on regexes, so it's
Shouldn't this be like totally easy with GNU Indent or so? You'll have
to give it the right CLI args. (We have a wrapper for that in coala if
you're interested in doing loads of other stuff but indent is usually
already there.)
Sincerely,
Lasse Schuirmann
la...@schuirmann.net
http://coala.io/ -
On 11/23/2016 05:03 AM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
Also, in the GNOME convention there is something that I don't like and
that I would prefer not to do: aligning all the parameter names on the
same column (the third column). I prefer aligning the parameter names
for each function separately, IMHO
On 11/23/2016 05:38 AM, Leslie S Satenstein via desktop-devel-list wrote:
Can someone tell me what is wrong with using the *indent* program?
indent does not fully support our style, nor does it align groups of
functions to add space so functions are aligned as a group.
Can someone tell me what is wrong with using the indent program?man indent for
detailsSummary The indent program can be used to make code easier to read. It
can also convert from one style of writing C to another.
indent understands a substantial amount about the syntax of C, but it
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 07:03:02PM +0100, Daiki Ueno wrote:
> For what it's worth, I wrote such elisp some time ago:
> http://elpa.gnu.org/packages/gnome-c-style.html
Cool, added to:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Newcomers/Tools-C-language
> If anyone is trying to implement the feature somewhere, I
On 11/21/2016 11:01 AM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
Ok, thanks, I can look at clang-format if it supports the GNOME/GTK+
convention for formatting function prototypes in a header.
Last I tried clang-format it couldn't format our reference alignment
rules in function prototypes.
Uncrustify could
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 03:49:09PM +, Ikey Doherty wrote:
> You could use clang-format and an appropriately configured
> .clang-format file to enforce coding convention within a source
> tree.
>
> I'd recommend checking: https://clangformat.com/ as a simple way
> to build your .clang-format
>
You could use clang-format and an appropriately configured
.clang-format file to enforce coding convention within a source
tree.
I'd recommend checking: https://clangformat.com/ as a simple way
to build your .clang-format
I tend to keep an "update_format.sh" script in my repos to ensure
Hi,
Is there a script to format the function prototypes in a C header, with
the GNOME conventions? I.e. aligning the function names on the same
column, aligning the parameters, etc.
Thanks,
Sébastien
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
