2008-06-24 klockan 00:53 skrev Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen:
However insulted some people will feel by Wouter's comments I beg; can
we please stop this thread here?
Sorry, seems my comments were a bit harsh. I should watch my words more
carefully when sending messages late at night... :)
For
Sorry Michael, must have missed your e-mail among the digests last week.
tor, 19 06 2008 kl. 12:14 +1000, skrev Michael Gratton:
Ahh, right. Can something be constructed to translate SPARQL (or some
useful subset) into Tracker's query format?
A subset, yes, but as Wouter points out Tracker is
A little note on the topic:
I've summarized the stack we're approaching between my talks with
Sebastian and the discussion here, at:
http://live.gnome.org/RDFStack
man, 23 06 2008 kl. 21:01 +0200, skrev Anders Feder:
Sorry Michael, must have missed your e-mail among the digests last week.
2008-06-23 klockan 21:01 skrev Anders Feder:
A subset, yes, but as Wouter points out Tracker is XESAM-based which
'only' cover simple query cases, so certain advanced SPARQL queries (in
particular 'join'-like operations) would map rather poorly into XESAM.
How such queries would be handled
Ah,
I have overheard late-night tales of this epic flamewar murmured in dark
corners of many a seedy IRC channel during my inquest into the history
of GNOMish metadata magicks, but had yet to peruse the transcription
scrolls for myself. I bid you thanks for the links ;)
man, 23 06 2008 kl. 23:56
2008/6/23 Wouter Bolsterlee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008-06-23 klockan 21:01 skrev Anders Feder:
A subset, yes, but as Wouter points out Tracker is XESAM-based which
'only' cover simple query cases, so certain advanced SPARQL queries (in
particular 'join'-like operations) would map rather poorly
