Hi Thomas!
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 12:50 + schrieb Thomas Wood:
I suggest we give MacSlow (CC'ed) till the end of the week to come up with
something uber sexy. I'll give it a lame try if he doesn't.
I thought this was GNOME we're talking about. We do professional
software, not
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 01:06 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:58 +, Iain * wrote:
Seeing as this is the only real reason for having this (I mean, who
else has ever run the about program and looked at all the names in
it)
I'm not sure what the purpose of this
tor, 08.03.2007 kl. 01.06 -0500, skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:58 +, Iain * wrote:
Seeing as this is the only real reason for having this (I mean, who
else has ever run the about program and looked at all the names in
it)
I'm not sure what the purpose of this
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 08:39 -0300, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 01:06 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:58 +, Iain * wrote:
Seeing as this is the only real reason for having this (I mean, who
else has ever run the about program and looked at
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 11:20 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
Another one is put it them only members of GNOME Foundation. It
supposed to be integrated by active members in the last two years
(4 releases).
Also, as a geek thing, it could encourage(?) to contributors to
being part of the
I think it would be a shame to drop the credits
for our past contributors. We're standing on the
shoulder of giants.
The giants are not the ones it matters to, they have their names tattooed
over everything. You are standing on the shoulders of a small army of
minor contributors, who probably
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:50 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
I thought this was GNOME we're talking about. We do professional
software, not pointless eye-candy, right? I'm not saying professional
looking software has to be boring, but there seems to be a tendency to
go over the top with GL
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 08:39 -0300, Germán Poó Caamaño wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 01:06 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:58 +, Iain * wrote:
Seeing as this is the only real reason for having this (I mean, who
else has ever run the about program and looked at
Le mardi 06 mars 2007 à 17:01 -0500, Luis Villa a écrit :
On 3/6/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Do you all remember that we list our contributors in About GNOME? The
list of GNOME contributors is probably outdated: many people contributed
a lot of stuff in recent years
On 3/7/07, Ronald S. Bultje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not in it. :-). Looking through the past few series and seeing
which more-than-once contributors are not in the list, I guess you'd
have to add (Including me):
Hi :)
Though I'm still learning the ropes, I've contributed a few patches to
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:31 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
[...]
It would be really great if all maintainers could take 10 minutes and
check that all of their main contributors are listed in there. To do so,
open this URL and look for the name of your contributors:
On 3/6/07, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could make it whiz through and get to any
specific name I wanted (e.g. mine) rather quickly.
Seeing as this is the only real reason for having this (I mean, who
else has ever run the about program and looked at all the names in it)
I propose
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 17:01 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
And I'll buy a $BEVERAGE_OF_CHOICE for anyone who makes the dang thing
sexy and less slow in 2.19.0. This is 2007; if our about box doesn't
optionally utilize GL, surely we've failed. :)
Bonus points for making it take less than, ya know,
On 3/7/07, Thomas Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we really must have a gnome-about dialog, shouldn't the contributors
list be kept up to date automatically? If it has to be updated manually
then it's only going to go out of date again for the next release.
We could use Tracker to get the
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:50 +, Thomas Wood wrote:
...
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 17:01 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
And I'll buy a $BEVERAGE_OF_CHOICE for anyone who makes the dang thing
sexy and less slow in 2.19.0. This is 2007; if our about box doesn't
optionally utilize GL, surely we've
Hi:
Making it accessible would be rather nice too... it hasn't worked well
with high contrast themes for years[1], and I'm guessing screenreaders
can't do much with it either.
Thanks for bringing this up, Calum! Orca definitely has issues with it:
On 3/7/07, Thomas Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we really must have a gnome-about dialog, shouldn't the contributors
list be kept up to date automatically? If it has to be updated manually
then it's only going to go out of date again for the next release.
Perhaps all svn account holders
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 14:09 +, Iain * wrote:
On a more serious note (i know, I'm in shock too) why don't we just
have a web page with everyone's names? that way its easy to update, we
can make it pretty, and put photos and biographies and what have you
on it.
I think making each
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:58 +, Iain * wrote:
Seeing as this is the only real reason for having this (I mean, who
else has ever run the about program and looked at all the names in
it)
I'm not sure what the purpose of this message of you was, but anyway,
I've done that a few times.
Hi Vincent,
I'm not in it. :-). Looking through the past few series and seeing
which more-than-once contributors are not in the list, I guess you'd
have to add (Including me):
Ronald S. Bultje
Sebastien Bacher
Tim-Philipp Muller - I don't know how to do a u-umlaut
Jens Granseuer
Wouter
On 3/6/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Do you all remember that we list our contributors in About GNOME? The
list of GNOME contributors is probably outdated: many people contributed
a lot of stuff in recent years and are not there. It's a shame to not
thank them, so we have to
Hi Vincent:
I've never been included in the Gnome contributors' list. I reckon it's
about time!
Bill Haneman
also
Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Di\xf3genes
Li Yuan
Harry Lu
David Bolter
Padraig O'Briain
and if Will doesn't send these himself:
Will Walker
Mike Pedersen
Thanks Vincent!
- Bill
Hi all [shame on lips],
I swear I thought that the reply-to was already set to Vincent, I'm
humbly sorry for spamming your inbox - and even more so with this
apology message. Please ignore me for the rest for the rest of the
week as punishment.
Ronald
On Mar 6, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Ronald S.
Sure and:
Rich Burridge
Joanmarie Diggs
Lynn Monsanto
Thanks!
Will
Bill Haneman wrote:
Hi Vincent:
I've never been included in the Gnome contributors' list. I reckon it's
about time!
Bill Haneman
also
Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Di\xf3genes
Li Yuan
Harry Lu
David Bolter
Padraig
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:31 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
Do you all remember that we list our contributors in About GNOME? The
list of GNOME contributors is probably outdated: many people contributed
a lot of stuff in recent years and are not there. It's a shame to not
thank them, so we
Le mardi 06 mars 2007, à 17:31, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:31 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
It'd be great to have the non-ascii characters in hexa, so for example:
Mariano Su\xc3\xa1rez-Alvarez instead of Mariano Suárez-Alvarez.
Any reason for hex encoding? That's
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 17:31 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
snip
And maybe it's time to make it data instead of code?
I had the same comment:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415516
--
Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
desktop-devel-list
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 00:01 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 06 mars 2007, à 17:31, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:31 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
It'd be great to have the non-ascii characters in hexa, so for example:
Mariano Su\xc3\xa1rez-Alvarez instead of Mariano
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:01:28AM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le mardi 06 mars 2007, ? 17:31, Behdad Esfahbod a ?crit :
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:31 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
It'd be great to have the non-ascii characters in hexa, so for example:
Mariano Su\xc3\xa1rez-Alvarez instead of
On 3/6/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonus points for making it take less than, ya know, about a million
hours to go through the whole list :)
Yeah, one-by-one alphabetical order doesn't sound very friendly.
/me remembers the old Win95 contributors easter egg...
An older
30 matches
Mail list logo
